Thoughts on On-Hit Effect Type Builds

[quote=animorte]On-hit items need to have more utility than just an extra little bit of damage each hit, especially considering that it is a flat amount, easily decreased by MR. Therefore each on-hit item definitely has its uses, just not all together and not all on the same champions.[/quote]

[quote=Shuk Truk Nahunt]I build some on-hit items with [[Warwick]] but just for utility. [[Frozen Mallet]] is my favorite one, after build [[Phage]] i give red buff to the team´s ranged carry. Usually i build [[Malady]] or [[Black Cleaver]] to debuff and help the carries to be more effective. And always get [[Wit's End]] if we are being owned by mid game.[/quote]

[quote=Luther3000]What is [i]with[/i] you people and [[malady]]? I'm tired of explaining how shitty it is.[/quote]

[quote=MasterShorty][quote=Luther3000] What is [i]with[/i] you people and [[malady]]? I'm tired of explaining how shitty it is. [/quote] because with teemo it is super awesome. currently the best item combo in game is Phage+Wits End. So yes, on hit is *very* viable. Of course, building full on hit is not optimal on every champion. Bruisers scale very well with Wits End and Frozen Mallet. The only champion that I can think of that does really well with a full on hit build is Teemo. Some people build Hecarim with full on hit...but those people are just lame...and not awesome.[/quote]

[quote=NicknameMy][[Malady]] should get some buffs.^^ Here is my [[malady]] rework. It would now cost more, but be way more effective Recipe: [[recurve bow]] (1050) + [[Blasting Wand]] (860) + 690 Cost: 2600 Effect: + 50 AP, + 50% AS Unique Passive: Your basic attacks deal 40 bonus magic damage and reduce magic resistance by 10 for 5 seconds (maximum 4 stacks). It could be maybe already OP, but it is this way at least a very viable on-hit item. And a buff to this makes [[madred's bloodrazor]] also more viable. But I would still reduce it's combine cost by 300 and increase the armor to 40.[/quote]