Awards Showcase
Show more awards
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jul 14th, 2016
"Ekko is better. You can build him tank or ap, play him in the jungle, top or mid. He's just stronger than Akali for every build and position. Now if you enjoy Akali the most (she has way less mechanical depth), go for her, she's decent in mid/top."
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jul 14th, 2016
"Because no counterplay."
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jul 12th, 2016
"It's probably both though. It probably has lots of bugs when calculating the contribution on top of the visualization ones (notice that some of these were fixed, while others were left untouched because it was "too much work for too little gain").
I also think coming up with a "ki"
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jul 12th, 2016
"It's probably used as an indirect way to measure kill contribution. IMO it's a terrible way to do it, but it might be better than making kills and assist equally valuable. At least they stopped doing it for support, so... "baby steps", I guess."
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jul 12th, 2016
"He has a bunch of different combos with clearly different outcomes. His ult has space to do some awesome stuff or some really derpy plays. By the looks of it I'd go as far as to call him a high skillcap champion."
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jul 12th, 2016
"
:')
I may or may not play nautilus support again."
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jul 11th, 2016
"The least useful leveling is 7 though. On the other hand, staying at level 5 when you have both lvl 6 shards means every S/S+ you get would be a "wasted&"
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jul 11th, 2016
"Yeah, that too."
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jul 11th, 2016
"TBH I also thought it was Riven when I saw the weapon preview. The most voted comment in the NA site being someone who got it wrong doesn't help either (typed Challenge and thought it was Riven). But yeah, "F"
Commented
Posted a Comment: Jul 11th, 2016
"PROJECT: katarina/ekko/ashe. Nice."