OTGBionicArm wrote:
There was no true compromise. I either have to deal with it (Im not going to make people *not* play what they want) or quit. I chose the latter.
That's good for you, a life improvement. But, I don't agree that there wasn't a compromise. You just chose to believe that, when a game wasn't going good for you and you started getting out-laned or killed repeatedly you would project your anger onto the person because of their skill-level. We couldn't just ban a person out because you hated playing with or against that person. The most I saw was just some banters going back and forth and it for some reason made you angrier than it should've.
Bryun wrote:
That's good for you, a life improvement. But, I don't agree that there wasn't a compromise. You just chose to believe that, when a game wasn't going good for you and you started getting out-laned or killed repeatedly you would project your anger onto the person because of their skill-level. We couldn't just ban a person out because you hated playing with or against that person. The most I saw was just some banters going back and forth and it for some reason made you angrier than it should've.
To be fair, your job as host was to balance the games. If I (And others!) was consistently against lanes I am getting **** stomped by, this is poor balance, is it not? I wouldn't place the blame entirely on me about this matter.
OTGBionicArm wrote:
To be fair, your job as host was to balance the games. If I was consistently am against lanes I am getting **** stomped by, this is poor balance, is it not? I wouldn't place the blame entirely on me about this matter.
That's true, but did I not constantly ask for a second opinion if the balancing was alright? It's not my priority to make sure you lane against a person of the same skill level, it's not fair to everyone in general. You may not even know this but I even did that once for you. Then you started complaining that the jungle was out to get you because you got ganked twice. What am I supposed to do there, accommodate again and tell the jungler to stop playing the game? I'm not blaming for everything that's happened in the inhouse, and I never did. I just lost my cool when you bashed me for no reason that one time, and it was justifiable for me to do that.
OTGBionicArm wrote:
To be fair, your job as host was to balance the games. If I (And others!) was consistently against lanes I am getting **** stomped by, this is poor balance, is it not? I wouldn't place the blame entirely on me about this matter.
The refs try to balance teams, not lanes. They can't choose who lanes against who.
OTGBionicArm wrote:
I see you're making this entirely about me still.
Oh my god, why can't you take criticism. You basically told me I was a **** host and I'm not mad. Take what you can chew bro.
Bryun wrote:
Oh my god, why can't you take criticism. You basically told me I was a **** host and I'm not mad.
I'm very open to criticism. I get mad when I feel like I'm wasting my time. I understand this. But this is also a very normal human reaction, and my expressing the issue shouldn't be rendered invalid for reacting in the matter I did.
OTGBionicArm wrote:
I'm very open to criticism. I get mad when I feel like I'm wasting my time. I understand this. But this is also a very normal human reaction, and my expressing the issue shouldn't be rendered invalid for reacting in the matter I did.
Nobody rendered your concerns invalid, I honestly don't know what I could've done to make inhouses a better experience for you in general because I really ****ing tried. Then I see a paragraph of you saying I play snowball champs on purpose to stomp people, who wouldn't get infuriated at that? But, I'm done talking about this stupid issue, I just want inhouses changed back to Saturday, that's all I want.
You need to log in before commenting.
Yeah I understand that there were some issues not solved that should've been addressed, that's partially my fault, but when you start getting angry at other players/lashing out just for playing how they want and not trying to compromise at all it just ended up making the situation worse.
There was no true compromise. I either have to deal with it (Im not going to make people *not* play what they want) or quit. I chose the latter.