We can only verify one account at the moment, so that would have to be a separate addition. I can bring it up as an option though.
Thanks to The_Nameless_Bard for the sig!
PsiGuard wrote:
Nameless I would actually say your Kayle experience would help you write a Kayle guide for another role as well. Sure, not all of it would transfer, but past the early game a lot of champions play the same no matter what role they're in.
Kayle". If that's true, I'm fairly certain that's more related to the years of experience playing her in multiple roles and not the playing her almost exclusively support for the last few seasons. I also think it's fine to add mastery levels, was just pointing out that it can be misleading in a way that had not been mentioned yet. It's nice for flair and I'm cool with more flair.
Sorry, I want to clarify my idea about Mastery flairs. You wouldn't necessarily get Mastery flairs for levels 5 or 6. I think for it to stand out and mean something, it should only be Mastery 7. It is much harder to get M7 compared to M5 (which I got after playing Lulu for 19 games). Warlemming consistently gets amazing scores on Veigar (think 12/2/7 average), but found it hard to get S rates and when he did, it took a long time for the necessary tokens to drop.
So, tldr: M7 flairs only. M7, if nothing else, shows dedication to learning the champion and playing the champion enough and well enough to get consistently high ratings.
So, tldr: M7 flairs only. M7, if nothing else, shows dedication to learning the champion and playing the champion enough and well enough to get consistently high ratings.
I like the idea a lot but I also agree with RE4XN about the number of games made before getting 4 S; someone playing 6000 games same champ before reaching his 4th S will appear as Lvl 7 mastery but well ... not that good ^^
Otherwise I was wondering about showing the 2 keystones on the guide description. (like left to the rating of the guide) so it is easier to see or remember what the guide is about without having to open several of them before we find the one we were looking after.
As an extra bonus, It would show immediatly which guides are really updated from the ones which appears updated but are not in fact.
Last, it would also help new guide authors to check which builds have already been made and detailed concerning specific champions.
Just a thought ...
Otherwise I was wondering about showing the 2 keystones on the guide description. (like left to the rating of the guide) so it is easier to see or remember what the guide is about without having to open several of them before we find the one we were looking after.
As an extra bonus, It would show immediatly which guides are really updated from the ones which appears updated but are not in fact.
Last, it would also help new guide authors to check which builds have already been made and detailed concerning specific champions.
Just a thought ...
@ Dzopilant By "2 keystones" do you mean the Keystone rune and the icon of the secondary path? If so, I agree that'd be a good addition if we can fit it in.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by your last couple points. What exactly would differentiate updated guides from people who just clicked publish without changing anything? And how would this help new guide authors check current builds better? Do you just mean they'll be able to see whether someone uses a similar rune setup?
I'm not quite sure what you mean by your last couple points. What exactly would differentiate updated guides from people who just clicked publish without changing anything? And how would this help new guide authors check current builds better? Do you just mean they'll be able to see whether someone uses a similar rune setup?
Thanks to Lugignaf for the sig!
@Psiguard, yes exactly. Think these 2 icons provides a lot of information by themselves about the build.
For updated guides, in fact you are right, will simply show the ones having not included any runes (still with marks / quints / glyphs and seals); maybe relevant right now but less and less with time.
For new guide authors yes, I remember struggling to read every single Teemo guide as I did not see the point to do a guide if someone else did almost exactly the same. Was both time consuming and kinda boring after a while. If the keystone / secondary path were showing it would have saved me lots of time and efforts. (spotting immediatly nobody was on arcane comet which I LOVE !)
Hope it is a little clearer what i meant :)
For updated guides, in fact you are right, will simply show the ones having not included any runes (still with marks / quints / glyphs and seals); maybe relevant right now but less and less with time.
For new guide authors yes, I remember struggling to read every single Teemo guide as I did not see the point to do a guide if someone else did almost exactly the same. Was both time consuming and kinda boring after a while. If the keystone / secondary path were showing it would have saved me lots of time and efforts. (spotting immediatly nobody was on arcane comet which I LOVE !)
Hope it is a little clearer what i meant :)
I added this to our list of change requests (we've reorganized things since this was suggested, so it wasn't being worked on). I don't have an ETA but it's on the list now, ty.
Thanks to The_Nameless_Bard for the sig!
You need to log in before commenting.
<Veteran>