Also, someone told me they found more of the calendar, it was just lost in war or something O_O
Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
Canoas wrote:
serves them right for being stupid.
why would you warn people the rapture is coming anyway? It won't change anything..
At most the guys who know they won't ascend will start committing even more crimes. They have nothing to lose right?
that is sadly a really good point.......
Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
ShadowReign757 wrote:
I just thought it was kinda weird that he said it was ending on May 21st 2011 when other people say it's ending on December 21st of 2012.
Also, I thought it was weird that the date of the supposed end of the world is 12/21/12, which is just a bunch of 1's and 2's.
Also, why base that off of a Mayan calendar? Ok, so they knew that they wouldn't last until 2012 so they gave up writing it. That automatically means we're all gonna die?
That's how I look at it anyways.
I find it funny that they didn't see the fall of there empire comeing, but ofc they know when the world is gonna end!
Clearly this civilatiation is all knowing!
haha nice point potatis.
i heard something about the mayans believing in a sort of 'rebirth' of the earth, where it was destroyed and created every (insert huge number) years and that 2012 was when the next rebirth would be.
i heard something about the mayans believing in a sort of 'rebirth' of the earth, where it was destroyed and created every (insert huge number) years and that 2012 was when the next rebirth would be.
I like things that make me feel stupid. - Ken Levine
Canoas wrote:
No.. I was raised as a catholic and I am 100% sure he did not turn it into his flesh and blood. He just put a part of him, his soul if you will, in the bread and wine.
The guys who wrote it must have a few screws lose.
But if you want to interpret the Bible literally then fine. He turned the bread and wine into his flesh and blood. However, he did not grab a knife and cut off part of his flesh or extracted his blood. The flesh and blood did not come directly from his body. Technically, there is no body they belong to, and without it belonging to a person it is not cannibalism. If scientists replicate human flesh and eat it it is not cannibalism since it did not belong to any human, just the same with Jesus creating human flesh. It's the definition of cannibalism.
Again, if you want to interpret the Bible literally then go ahead, but you're only making a fool out of yourself because you're even more wrong. Next time at least take 5 secs to look up cannibalism on the dictionary.
Not to mention Jesus isn't even human, he's a a divine person. Cannibalism means human eating other humans, not humans eating gods.
EDIT: Oh, and since you are basing your facts on that webpage, then please read it a little furher down:
"All transubstantiation means is that the elements continue to seem to be bread and wine in every physical way, but they have actually become the body and blood, soul and divinity of Jesus."
http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=5001271
1. Cannibalism is a person eating another person.
2. Communion is a person eating a divine person (i.e Jesus).
3. But aren't we are all God's Children?
4. What we do unto others we literally do unto Jesus.
Therefore; when you eat a person, you eat Jesus.
As for communion being off cannibalistic nature, I did find it silly at first and of course I never believed or even though about Jesus turning the bread and wine into his flesh and blood while they were eating it. This claim can only be made by people who does not believe Jesus to be a divine person (thus making it cannibalism). However, there is a contradiction; if Jesus is not a divine person it is impossible for him to turn the bread and wine into his flesh and blood as they were eating it. The resolution on my part goes back to the original symbolic meaning of communion, the silly thing was that when I argued with an ex-catholic who made this claim he also made the accusation of me not knowing the catholic church. But I digress, I guess the jokes on me then.
PS: I'm a liberal ffs, I don't take sides.
Canoas
<Member>
<Member>
@alahric
but did you see my link? =D
Also, the mayan's calendar doesn't end in 21/12/2112. They had 2 special numbers, one was 300 and something (let's call it A), the other was around 13 or so (let's call it B). Every A years there's a very important date for them, and every A*B years it's even more important. 21/12/2112 was one of those A*B dates.
I know I'm not explaining it very well, but I don't remember the details about it.
but did you see my link? =D
Also, the mayan's calendar doesn't end in 21/12/2112. They had 2 special numbers, one was 300 and something (let's call it A), the other was around 13 or so (let's call it B). Every A years there's a very important date for them, and every A*B years it's even more important. 21/12/2112 was one of those A*B dates.
I know I'm not explaining it very well, but I don't remember the details about it.
You need to log in before commenting.
Also, I thought it was weird that the date of the supposed end of the world is 12/21/12, which is just a bunch of 1's and 2's.
Also, why base that off of a Mayan calendar? Ok, so they knew that they wouldn't last until 2012 so they gave up writing it. That automatically means we're all gonna die?
That's how I look at it anyways.