What about the "Similar Lists" at the side of each guide.
Were those included?? Because those usually get looked at the most while a person is browsing a guide directly.
Were those included?? Because those usually get looked at the most while a person is browsing a guide directly.
~ Gentlemen Cho'Gath ~ |
┌──┠┴──┴ < ಠ,....,ರೃ> |
~ Keeping this sig classy ~ |
The DevTracker - For all of LoL's latest developments! | Spongebob Squarepants - The Pride of Bikini Bottom
Guides of Mine - Click the... Eh... Come back later
~Undergoing barbaric-Destruction, tasteful-Renovation, and blasphemous-Reconstruction soonâ„¢~
(╯°□°)╯︵ â”»â”â”» | ┬──┬ ノ( ゜-゜ノ) |
I feel like the most recommended guides should still contain general guides, because guides like Searz Rune guide and my New Player FAQ are highly recommended BECAUSE they're things everyone should know.
Maybe the highly rated vet guides too? Since it's like "advice from veterans" But I think that one is more iffy.
Thanks for finally putting this in though, I think it's a good change. :)
Maybe the highly rated vet guides too? Since it's like "advice from veterans" But I think that one is more iffy.
Thanks for finally putting this in though, I think it's a good change. :)

Thanks to GrandMasterD for my sig!
The Sidebar. I was talking specifically about the "Highly Recommended Guides" one. It's hard to say if they should be put into the other categories, but right now I think they're pretty hard to find for newcomers. Possibly should be included in "Top Guns" or "Veteran Advice" as well, but I think if that is so the general guides will almost always be at top, so there will be less diversity of champions. At the very least though I think they should be included in the "Highly Recommended Guides."

Thanks to GrandMasterD for my sig!
You need to log in before commenting.
<Retired Moderator>