Well, imo we just need one more category for Unconventional builds. Builds that are not meant for competitive play.
"Games may not be art, but this one did wonderful things to my ****." - Roger Ebert
"I AM PRETTY SURE THIS MANGA IS VIOLATING SOME LAWS ABOUT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
I CANNOT GET ENOUGH
****" - mencretnas, on Gigantomakhia
"I AM PRETTY SURE THIS MANGA IS VIOLATING SOME LAWS ABOUT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
I CANNOT GET ENOUGH
****" - mencretnas, on Gigantomakhia
Searz wrote:
Well, imo we just need one more category for Unconventional builds. Builds that are not meant for competitive play.
This is still unnecessary if we just input guide categories. We won't need to label an Annie build as "unconventional" if it's categorized as "tank".
Jebus McAzn wrote:
This is still unnecessary if we just input guide categories. We won't need to label an Annie build as "unconventional" if it's categorized as "tank".
You could always implement both, actually show which archtype it is for next to the build name(able to sort by this) and also an unconventional category.
Zeprido is currently:Online
If I've helped you at all in any way, or you really like my post click that +Rep button =)
You can always call me Zep for short =D
Feel free to private message me with questions/concerns or if you just want to chat =)
Imo it seems like it's easier to just add one "Unconventional" category, than to add a list of all the roles you can build. We don't even know all the categories that can be used and it will probably be a hassle to make even more ones since it's almost certain that we'll miss some role.
We can also be certain that loads of users will place their builds in the wrong role.
We can also be certain that loads of users will place their builds in the wrong role.
"I saw [Twilight: Eclipse] in theaters with a girl I was dating at the time. I spent more time staring at my toes and wiggling them than I did watching this abomination. When Edward proposed to Blank Face, I finally looked up with a revelation.
I blurted out loud, in a dead silent theater full of teenage girls on opening night "Wait a minute, Edward has no blood flow. How does he get an erection?" I heard several men laughing, and had several girls turn and stare at me.
I did not get laid that night." - Berengier817
I blurted out loud, in a dead silent theater full of teenage girls on opening night "Wait a minute, Edward has no blood flow. How does he get an erection?" I heard several men laughing, and had several girls turn and stare at me.
I did not get laid that night." - Berengier817
CoRpusCoLLoSsuM
<Member>
<Member>
CoRpusCoLLoSsuM wrote:
I'm a little confused.. If a guide has two builds for the same champion (like mine.. >.>), will they get filtered out into the team category? Or is that what you mean by "similar builds"..
It will not get filtered out. That was actually one of the primary reasons for doing this - those builds were being considered "team builds" before, but now they are properly being considered "champion builds" :)
You need to log in before commenting.
The "AD/AP/etc" thing is something we would like to do too... That would be separate of guide types. Would you call that "Role"? We've discussed this before but were never able to nail down a proper list of roles. If we can come up with a solid list, I can put it in. Then we can display the role in listings and add a filter for it to help users find what they want more easily.