VoiD wrote:
Yet another proof that TheJohn doesnt know any **** that hes talking about
LOL burn
but seriously, you have to judge it champ by champ. the pricing of champs does not reflect their viability in game, only their market value in riot's eyes. When a champ gets a price reduction (especially a reduction to 450 IP), it's only because riot wants to squeeze a little more money out of that champ or they feel that the champ no longer needs a high IP Price and they are essentially taking them "off the market." I would say the only definitive factor contributing to a champ's price is their age. If you think about it, Riot offers two things to their customers: Champions, and a platform on which to use those champions. That is all, and I'm sure they have their own marketing team to determine how to make the most off their champions.
Temzilla wrote:
AD Caster who has to carefully micro his ultimate to be played to potential? :s
I mean yeah he's faceroll, but he's a lot harder to play than most of the other Melee Casters.
my point was that since they require more influence points, they don't want people summoning them. which makes sense for some (maokai, nocturne), it doesnt make sense for others (yorick, who wants people to remember him.)
I like things that make me feel stupid. - Ken Levine
caucheka wrote:
lol i guess. thats the point of calling it influence points right? to use your influence as a summoner to have champions let you summon them..
IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW!

I love my rammus as well <3 /adapt to all situations!
TheJohn wrote:
I thought so when I bought Renekton, but then I got Poppy for only 1350. Poppy is thousands of time stronger than Renekton. I felt like I wasted money.
That's very anecdotal AND it contradicts your original post which promotes 6300 priced champs being good.
Your original post was just complaining about 3150 IP champions.
Poppy is 1350, and I said "a majority" of 6300 champions. There are plenty of bad 6300 priced champions too.
There are viable champions in all the price ranges, and less-than-worthwhile champions as well.
Any pattern of disappointment is all in your head~
~ Gentlemen Cho'Gath ~ |
┌──┠┴──┴ < ಠ,....,ರೃ> |
~ Keeping this sig classy ~ |
The DevTracker - For all of LoL's latest developments! | Spongebob Squarepants - The Pride of Bikini Bottom
Guides of Mine - Click the... Eh... Come back later
~Undergoing barbaric-Destruction, tasteful-Renovation, and blasphemous-Reconstruction soonâ„¢~
(╯°□°)╯︵ â”»â”â”» | ┬──┬ ノ( ゜-゜ノ) |
JunSupport wrote:
That's very anecdotal AND it contradicts your original post which promotes 6300 priced champs being good.
Your original post was just complaining about 3150 IP champions.
Poppy is 1350, and I said "a majority" of 6300 champions. There are plenty of bad 6300 priced champions too.
There are viable champions in all the price ranges, and less-than-worthwhile champions as well.
Any pattern of disappointment is all in your head~
ANOTHER proof that TheJohn doesn't know anything hes talking about
B-Wong wrote:
the price isn't close to being relative to the champions strength at all lmfao.
Thats true. But shouldnt prices be changed? A few champions got their prices changed since I started playing (there's an year already).
And that thing of using your influence to summon champions makes sense.

You need to log in before commenting.
6300 are the 'unique' champions. that or they 'have reasons' to be restrictive to who plays as them. some of them don't really seem to fit that last reason, ie yorick.
AD Caster who has to carefully micro his ultimate to be played to potential? :s
I mean yeah he's faceroll, but he's a lot harder to play than most of the other Melee Casters.