Solo Queue

[quote=Nighthawk][quote=JEFFY40HANDS] "All students who suck at math shouldn't be allowed to learn it" [/quote] yes plox? :D[/quote]

[quote=Mooninites]hopefully this jackass who made the thread gets banned[/quote]

[quote=DuffTime][quote=Crows foot] I actually thought that you if anyone in here could take a quick banter in passing. I won't ask forgiveness for the words I said, but I will point out that no grave insult was meant. [/quote] Cheers :P[/quote]

[quote=The_Nameless_Bard]Leavers should = DRAW. In a draw you would gain no XP (if any would be awarded) or ELO and the IP awarded would be equal to all players other than the leavers (who would receive none). In the case that you win a 4v5 or 3v5 as the underdog team everything is normal, but the leavers gain no ELO, no XP (if any would be awarded), and no IP.[/quote]

[quote=Embracing]-Nameless brings back the topic-[/quote]

[quote=Fox Rage][quote=The_Nameless_Bard] Leavers should = DRAW. In a draw you would gain no XP (if any would be awarded) or ELO and the IP would be equal to all players other than the leavers. In the case that you win a 4v5 or 3v5 as the underdog team everything is normal, but the leavers gain no ELO, no XP (if any would be awarded), and no IP. [/quote] People would abuse it, leaving when they're losing so they don't lose ELO or anything (Not sure if I understood what you meant clearly >.>) . I personally believe the losing team should still lose ELO, but only half of it, while the leaver lose 2 times the ELO he would haev lost normallly. I.E. I usually lose around 12 ELO. So, if I get a leaver, I only lose 6 ELO, while the leaver would have lost 24 ELO[/quote]

[quote=Luther3000]Yeah Nameless, people in ranked would just get someone to leave the game if it seemed like a certain loss so that they wouldn't lose Elo. That's one of the reasons why there's no method to counter leavers ingame, because someone would find a way to abuse it.[/quote]

[quote=Fox Rage][quote=Luther3000] Yeah Nameless, people in ranked would just get someone to leave the game if it seemed like a certain loss so that they wouldn't lose Elo. That's one of the reasons why there's no method to counter leavers ingame, because someone would find a way to abuse it. [/quote] A sage man once said : If you can't stop the fire, close the windows. In other word, if you cant stop people from leaving (wich is impossible), try to make it a bit less worst. Riot should listen to my infinite wisdom P.S. For those of you who didn't understand the link between fire and windows, when you close the windows, the fire have less oxygen. Less oxygen = less strong. Less strong = easier to control. Easier to control = less injuries. That's why it's recommended to close all the doors and windows behind you when your house is burning[/quote]

[quote=Luther3000]Well, what exactly could you do? The only things I could think of would be giving the remaining four players a buff (which is abusable) or replacing the missing player with a bot (which would be worse than nothing).[/quote]

[quote=Fox Rage][quote=Luther3000] Well, what exactly could you do? The only things I could think of would be giving the remaining four players a buff (which is abusable) or replacing the missing player with a bot (which would be worse than nothing). [/quote] If you are facing a team that is anything near good, you will not win the 4v5. Simple as that. That's why my suggestion was lowering the ELO loss of the victims (the team with the leaver) while increasing the ELO loss of the leaver [quote]I personally believe the losing team should still lose ELO, but only half of it, while the leaver lose 2 times the ELO he would haev lost normallly. I.E. I usually lose around 12 ELO. So, if I get a leaver, I only lose 6 ELO, while the leaver would have lost 24 ELO[/quote][/quote]