Sometimes, I question the intelligence of...

[quote=Samoh]Ratings mean nothing, and they never will in any format.[/quote]

[quote=Luther3000][quote=Lugignaf] @Canoas On the Waterfront. 1954. Black and white. 8.4 on imdb. I think we've proven something here. [/quote] Also: Star Wars Episode IV (1977) - 8.8 Star Wars Episode V (1980) - 8.8 Star Wars Episode VI (1983) - 8.3 Star Wars Episode I (1999) - 6.4 Star Wars Episode II (2002) - 6.8 Star Wars Episode III (2005) - 7.7 Star wars is a perfect example of a series gone wrong and how a great story and characters will [i]always[/i] be superior to all the shitty CGI in the world. In gaming, the Final Fantasy series is a similar example.[/quote]

[quote=Psychofrench][quote=Luther3000] a great story and characters will [i]always[/i] be superior to all the shitty CGI in the world. [/quote] I could never argue against that.[/quote]

[quote=Samoh][quote=Luther3000] a great story and characters will [i]always[/i] be superior to all the shitty CGI in the world. [/quote] Too true.[/quote]

[quote=Canoas]Those movies are only proving my point. Graphics aren't the only thing that matters, but it is still important. That's why Avatar, which has a crappy story, was able to get 8.0. I don't see how listing the star wars movies and their rating proves your point. It only proves mine. I also, agree that a good story and gameplay is more important than good graphics, and that's what I've been defending so far. What you have been defending is that graphics don't matter. Please don't try and switch your argument, that's not what you've been saying in the last 7 pages.[/quote]

[quote=mysim20]I believe you shouldn't write a review about something unless you really know what you're talking about. Such as judging graphics even though there is a possiblity of there being budget cuts as well as or it isn't as new.[/quote]

[quote=Canoas]@mysim whether there were budget cuts or the game is old doesn't really matter. I mean, those are just excuses for the graphics to be bad, it doesn't change the fact that the graphics are bad. If you do so then there can be excuses for everything, be it story, music, gameplay or graphics, and you'd have to give every game a 10/10.[/quote]

[quote=Luther3000]Point out where I said graphics didn't matter please. Spoiler: I didn't. Now stop baiting me into replying. >.>[/quote]

[quote=Searz][quote=Canoas] Why exactly isn't Skyrim good? It was the game of the year for a reason.[/quote] If you can't see how Skyrim failed at many important points then I'm not even gonna bother discussing this.[/quote]

[quote=Searz][quote=Yukimaru] While i wont say graphics should be completly ignored, i hate it that the game-industry focus on graphics more then gameplay, i mean its a GAME!!! the most important part is Gameplay (and in case of a RPG, Story), besides that the next-gen gamer's are such pussy's cuz most games nowadays are so friggin easy, but luckily we still have Japan who does their shit in games right.[/quote] /agree[/quote]