Searz wrote:
This makes no sense and seems more like something a child would say when they don't understand the situation, but still want to "defend" themselves. (then again, you might be a child and there's nothing being one)
Well I know you've never looked at my profile then, but no I'm not a child. I do understand the situation, but stop trying to make it seem like it's only my fault.
Searz wrote:
But are you finally realizing that they are pointless and a little immature?
Comments like "Toshabi: 1, Canoas: 0" are even worse as they are not only devoid of anything in the least bit useful, they also serve to edge on the people discussing, possibly just turning it into a big flame-fest.
I said it because he is right, and obviously it did cause a flame-fest since you are saying this to me. It probably was unnecessary to say but honestly, I've seen worse than that.
Searz wrote:
Keep in mind that I am NOT trying to insult you. I only want help you get better at contributing to discussions.
Thanks I guess. Besides this thread and the 1-0 comment I made on the other thread. I've been fine, as far as I know.
Canoas wrote:
Are you serious? I think we can all agree that your comment makes much more sense when applied to you.
But hey, maybe I'm not being fair and your comments are actually interesting and filled with precious insights, so let me just check your 10 replies on the last 6 pages, which comprise 16.67% of the comments.
Not every single one of my comments had to relate to the thread discussion. I was merely replying to other comments, and you're gonna use that to say my comments are pointless. Not cool.
Canoas wrote:
I don't contribute much to the discussion? Lol. This is undeniable proof that, like Searz said, your comments are "utterly pointless and honestly, rather immature."
I'm talking about your "contribution" to MY comment. I guess you read it differently than I intended.
This:
Canoas wrote:
@Xeronn
Thank you. What you said proves that the bible is full of ******** and contradictory ideas. If god exists then he must be bipolar. However, why are you going to ignore the morals from the passages I quoted and choose only the ones that coincide with our current values? Why not the other way around? You either accept the bible or you don't, you can't start choosing the passages you like and ignoring the ones you don't.
How did this help in any way? I stuck with exactly the passages you were referring to. You MADE UP the "morals" just from reading it. I either accept the bible or I don't? Everything I said WAS from the bible.
Canoas wrote:
I tried not to sound mean, but there's a limit to how friendly you can appear when criticizing someone.
Yea, you are so right on that though.
Xeronn wrote:
but stop trying to make it seem like it's only my fault.
That makes no sense :/
Quoted:
I said it because he is right, and obviously it did cause a flame-fest since you are saying this to me. It probably was unnecessary to say but honestly, I've seen worse than that.
Change the "because he is right" to "because I think he is right" and it's much better. Definition is important.
There's always worse, but that's no excuse.
Saying something like "I agree with Toshabi on this matter" is infinitely better, even if somewhat lacking in useful content. Try to back up statements with a reasoning, something like "I agree with Toshabi because I think his opinions on pony sex are valid". (replace pony sex with topic of choice)
Quoted:
Thanks I guess. Besides this thread and the 1-0 comment I made on the other thread. I've been fine, as far as I know.
You might wanna look over your overall commenting, because I see a lot of comments with very little useful content. Just something to keep in mind.
"You can't have your privacy violated if you don't know your privacy is violated." - Mike Rogers, U.S. Representative for Michigan's 8th congressional district, 2013
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
DillButt64 wrote:
guys can we please keep this thread on the topic of "debating" religion instead of saying whos posts are more useless than the others
The religious debate is dead in case you didn't notice..
"every now and again you come across a game that has so little emotional connection to who you are that you end up standing there, gazing at the screen and saying "I'm just pressing buttons and my life has no meaning,"" - Colin Campbell
Searz wrote:
The religious debate is dead in case you didn't notice..
And on the third day, it will rise again from the grave!
MrCuddowls wrote:
Hahahaha telling me my items are bad HHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAhA
Listen buddy don't judge someone's items if your only level 13
This build is Platinum approved, Thats all you need to know
Toshabi wrote:
And on the third day, it will rise again from the grave!
Just like Mithra, the dude jesus was based on! But it's been three days and yesterday was Sunday, so we know it won't resurrect.
Xeronn wrote:
I said it because he is right, and obviously it did cause a flame-fest since you are saying this to me. It probably was unnecessary to say but honestly, I've seen worse than that.
You do realise that what toshabi wrote made no sense whatsoever, right? At most it could be used as a reply against him..
Xeronn wrote:
Not every single one of my comments had to relate to the thread discussion. I was merely replying to other comments, and you're gonna use that to say my comments are pointless. Not cool.
Xeronn wrote:
How did this help in any way? I stuck with exactly the passages you were referring to. You MADE UP the "morals" just from reading it. I either accept the bible or I don't? Everything I said WAS from the bible.

DillButt64 wrote:
thats no reason to derail the topic though, try to make it come back alive
You need to log in before commenting.
Are you serious? I think we can all agree that your comment makes much more sense when applied to you.
But hey, maybe I'm not being fair and your comments are actually interesting and filled with precious insights, so let me just check your 10 replies on the last 6 pages, which comprise 16.67% of the comments.
I don't contribute much to the discussion? Lol. This is undeniable proof that, like Searz said, your comments are "utterly pointless and honestly, rather immature."
I tried not to sound mean, but there's a limit to how friendly you can appear when criticizing someone.