This thread is locked
PLEASE NOTE: This thread has been locked by the moderators. You cannot reply to it.
Ty MM and Blood for the sigs :3 | Rammus is comming back - heard it here first!

"Carrying"-guide | My reviewservice

"Carrying"-guide | My reviewservice
Was quite simple. Adc has more impact than support, let the higher skilled played (i.e. higher elo in this example) have the more impact.
How is that german?
How is that german?
If you for some reason want to follow my ranked journey to gold, you can do it Here.
I am against asking for rep, only rep me if you think I contributed well or said something wise.
I am against asking for rep, only rep me if you think I contributed well or said something wise.

Wasn't hard to understand, though I don't really agree with the 'whoever is higher in elo is the better player to be playing the ADC role' feel to it. Even if Nick were still platinum (as in season 2), I'd consider myself the better AD ;)
lol, not sure why it was German sounding. Basically I meant exactly what Crows said. I wasn't aware that Nick didn't play ADCs, AND that he was no longer Plat, otherwise I wouldn't have made the comment. Basically, I was treating the situation the same way as when Max and I would duo. As he's the higher elo (Plat), I would never assume to make him support me, especially as his mechanics are far better than mine.
I kinda meant that just because you're higher elo doesn't mean you're a better ad-carry thus not meaning that guy should ad-carry.
As an example i duo-quee with a guy. I'm Plat III and he's gold II. Our ad-carry is kinda similar(mine is prolly a little better than his) yet we always go for him as the ad-carry because my support is so much better than his and i have a lot bigger of an impact onto the game supporting than he has.
What i mean is elo=/=picks
As an example i duo-quee with a guy. I'm Plat III and he's gold II. Our ad-carry is kinda similar(mine is prolly a little better than his) yet we always go for him as the ad-carry because my support is so much better than his and i have a lot bigger of an impact onto the game supporting than he has.
What i mean is elo=/=picks
Ty MM and Blood for the sigs :3 | Rammus is comming back - heard it here first!

"Carrying"-guide | My reviewservice

"Carrying"-guide | My reviewservice
Game 62+63
Duo Queue with "Vapora Dark" (Khazem)

Just realised I haven't even posted these two games, played on the 28th on February.
Don't really remember a lot, Khazem got incredibly fed on

Second game Khazem picked

Gained 1 Point.
LP: 51
As for why I haven't played ranked since, I've been pretty busy with uni stuff and I'm currently working on getting my top lane play back up to a respectable level. I have no uni next week though, so I expect to dive back into ranked and go for gold soonTM.
Also, I might be streaming.
Game 64-66
Solo Queue

First game (








The reason we lost, in the end (and feel free to read this sentence multiple times in order to fully grasp what it says), is because we got baited by




Games after that were better though, I missed a lot of cs in the



Last game I picked Ez again but was told not to pick him while MF was open, so I was like "oh eeeh, ok.." and went for









Lost 9, gained 6 and 7. Have to keep winning a lot if my LP gains remain that low.
LP: 55
Score so far: 33-33 >.>
In the case that you do put all your eggs into one basket (ie, one lane), the person with the higher elo should be ADCing, and the lower supporting. Like if I duo'd with PsiGuard, I wouldn't be the ADC. However, that's a little bit of an extreme example; I didn't realise Nick was only a tier above you. Just keep keeping on!
Reading this post was like reading german to me.
I somewhat understood what jhoijhoi was trying to say, but it still didn't make any sense.