Hello,

I don't think it is a good idea to display that image to prove that it is the highest winrate build. The 0.13% difference between CS and ToB does not prove anything and the 1% difference between DH and Comet is also kinda iffy. If you check other stat sites the winrates are closer to each other. Unless the wr difference is like 2-3% with a significant playrate on both runes, using winrate as an argument is questionable imo.

My point is, you can easily find a set of stat that supports your view and ignore the ones that not.

As for other arguments, you could mention that most of the pros are running Arcane Comet so that makes it the best build. However they also seem rather fond of Galeforce. There are also a lot of high elo MF players that are running this build (most notably the koreans). I myself usually dislike parroting what other players are doing and instead try to figure out why they're running it & write that down.

As for the ability rundown. It's not exactly a rundown of abilities. Of course you could say that anyone can just read them and figure out how they're used, but that's exactly what you're supposed to tell as guide author.

It is mostly a discussion on why comet + E max > DH + Q max. This could be way more concise. It's no use mentioning all these fancy numbers. "150 damage per cast"? This is depends on your level, items and what champion you are playing against. The amount of DH stacks in 30 minutes? Where on op.gg can you even find that stat? The numbers don't really have any meaning or use. You could just say that you can proc comet more often and that it therefore has higher overall damage.

To debate on the scaling part, "more damage" doesn't mean anything. Let's take a comparison: I'm a Lissandra main and in the past I played games with Arcane Comet instead of the now-standard Electrocute. In the post-game screen, the damage numbers of Arcane Comet were usually higher than Electrocute. I could use this to say that Arcane Comet > Electrocute. However, this was not the case. Although comet did more damage overall, the damage was spaced out over time or hit enemies I didn't want it to hit. Enemies could heal it back and ultimately it didn't contribute to what I actually wanted to do.

Same for comet vs DH on MF. Although comet will have the higher damage numbers in the end, DH is more likely to actually have impact in skirmishes and fights. Especially since comet will hit once per 10 seconds and you can hit DH multiple times in a 10 second teamfight. Therefore I think DH scales better than comet in a teamfight setting and not vice versa. Comparing Q max to E max is arbitrary when talking about scaling since you will have maxed both of them by that time.