Climate change n' stuff

[quote=DarkPercy][quote=Searz] Again: does that statement not apply to itself? Stop the stupidity. [/quote] Sorry if I sound ignorant or stupid but I just don't get how that statement can actually apply to itself? When people do a research about a debate, they already have their opinion made even before looking at the facts. So their research is actually just them trying to find all the little things that prove them right, ignoring anything that says otherwise. Now if we... apply this concept... to itself ? I already have my opinion made about people already having their opinion made so when I search those people I ........ wtf ?!?!??![/quote]

[quote=DillButt64][quote=Bioalchemist] again why do threads with potential just go to religious argument? it has become so redundant. than ultimately after the religious 'discussion' has reached a point it just becomes personal attacks which is typical of people who don't know how to debate. go make a thread with cuddowls if you want to argue religion and leave the threads that involve interesting scientific topics to the adults please. [/quote] i blame Searz, he tends to make remarks about religion randomly in threads and it sparks things like this EDIT: and for the proof that it was searz in this particular thread [quote=Searz] [b]Absolute[/b] proof [i]might[/i] be impossible right now, but hey, we can't disprove God, that must mean that he exists! [/quote] i mean its nice and all that you can type whatever you want in this post box but no need to bring religion to every thread about science (this applies to everyone not just searz)[/quote]

[quote=GrandmasterD][quote=Pheyniex] i'm glad we have a constructive argument about the environment. [quote=GrandmasterD] First, it's spelt [i][b]in[/b]doctrinating[/i]. [/quote] I just noticed how witty I really am. [quote=GrandmasterD] While I'm egocentric, which btw isn't my fault [/quote] you are quite funny as well! edit: [quote=GrandmasterD] Primitive way of explaining things we see such as the laws of nature. [/quote] i forgot to mention this quoted sentence is missing a subject. [/quote] It's an answer to his question, omitting pronoun subjects is a style of writing that can easily be used once the subject is clear. Also, don't try to lecture me on the English language, as you have the tendency to make a spelling or grammatical mistake about sentence. Also yes I am indeed quite hilarious but well, [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder]please educate yourself[/url]![/quote]

[quote=Searz][quote=Embracing] And lol. I highly doubt you have magic powers. If you proved it I would believe you, but since you "refuse to", I choose not to.[/quote] Holy shit, how are you not connecting the dots? Wow, the moment a religious person unknowingly calls his own ways stupid.[/quote]

[quote=Darcurse]Need years to believe that global warming exists. Even then, still need prove that noone else besides humans can be the source. [img=http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/15038715.jpg] (I know that most here may not be american and still talk such BS, but scenario was to good to pass on)[/quote]

[quote=Searz][quote=DarkPercy] Sorry if I sound ignorant or stupid but I just don't get how that statement can actually apply to itself? When people do a research about a debate, they already have their opinion made even before looking at the facts. So their research is actually just them trying to find all the little things that prove them right, ignoring anything that says otherwise.[/quote] Your opinion is that people have predetermined opinions that they only seek to confirm, not deny when they research them. And this opinion is something that - since you believe in it - you're probably only seeking to confirm, not deny. [quote=DillButt64] i blame Searz, he tends to make remarks about religion randomly in threads and it sparks things like this[/quote][quote=Searz] [b]Absolute[/b] proof [i]might[/i] be impossible right now, but hey, we can't disprove God, that must mean that he exists![/quote] I realize now that I should have used 'the boogeyman' or 'santa' instead of 'god', because they're pretty much the same thing to me. I just wanted to use a fictional being to illustrate the stupidity in his comment and god being all-encompassing and all, was the first that came to my mind :3[/quote]

[quote=Pheyniex][quote=GrandmasterD] It's an answer to his question, omitting pronoun subjects is a style of writing that can easily be used once the subject is clear. Also, don't try to lecture me on the English language, as you have the tendency to make [s]a[/s] spelling or grammatical mistake[u][b](s)[/b][/u] [s]about[/s] in sentence[u][b](s)[/b][/u]. [/quote] oh, style. btw, you know english verbs require a noun or pronoun since they have little to no variation between subjcts, do you? or should i now start calling you mr. dictionary? or are you simply being a hypocrite? [quote=GrandmasterD] Also yes I am indeed quite hilarious but well, [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder]please educate yourself[/url]! [/quote] you poor thing. are you taking medication for that?[/quote]

[quote=Mooninites][quote=Darcurse] Need years to believe that global warming exists. Even then, still need prove that noone else besides humans can be the source. (I know that most here may not be american and still talk such BS, but scenario was to good to pass on) [/quote] Still waiting on proof, are you going to put your money where your mouth is or continue rambling on without providing anything intelligent to the conversation?[/quote]

[quote=Searz][quote=Mooninites] Still waiting on proof, are you going to put your money where your mouth is or continue rambling on without providing anything intelligent to the conversation?[/quote] The same could be said about you.[/quote]

[quote=GrandmasterD][quote=Pheyniex] [quote=GrandmasterD] It's an answer to his question, omitting pronoun subjects is a style of writing that can easily be used once the subject is clear. Also, don't try to lecture me on the English language, as you have the tendency to make [s]a[/s] spelling or grammatical mistake[u][b](s)[/b][/u] [s]about[/s] in sentence[u][b](s)[/b][/u]. [/quote] oh, style. btw, you know english verbs require a noun or pronoun since they have little to no variation between subjcts, do you? or should i now start calling you mr. dictionary? or are you simply being a hypocrite? [quote=GrandmasterD] Also yes I am indeed quite hilarious but well, [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder]please educate yourself[/url]! [/quote] you poor thing. are you taking medication for that? [/quote] It's a term, look it up. While you're at it, look up the definition of the word hypocrite. If you read anything you'd know that there isn't any medication. Not sure why I would take it if it existed though, lol.[/quote]