Searz wrote:
My money is on Sony, because I, like many other core gamers, think the Wii U controller is terrible.
are you talking about the actual controller or the wii u pro controller, because the latter looks pretty nice
EvilDice wrote:
are you talking about the actual controller or the wii u pro controller, because the latter looks pretty nice
The actual controller. The one 90% of the games will be built for.
It matters little if there's a second controller when they use completely different control schemes. (the second one can't play all the games)
"Doing something, almost being done, then parents come in and don't let you finish.
Yes, I had a rough childhood." - devdevil
Yes, I had a rough childhood." - devdevil
Searz wrote:
The actual controller. The one 90% of the games will be built for.
It matters little if there's a second controller when they use completely different control schemes. (the second one can't play all the games)
Really? I have a Wii U and most of the game I've played have the wii U main control as optional. Even then, as skeptic as I was, the wii U's main control for the games released so far aren't as crippling as you think.
SkidmarkD wrote:
Yes, yes I have. Ever played 2 player Mortal Combat on a PC, using a single keyboard?
It's waaaay harder than modern fight games single player using mouse and keyboard.
As for driving: Arrow-keys + shift/alt/tab/ctrl/space = more than enough to replace any controller.
Seriously, you're gonna tell me the use of a limited button controller is the defining factor in why console are better than PC's?
You both seem to overlook the fact that this is a limitation/feature only brought on by the control method, not the actual platform itself.
PC supports controllers.
"Well, basically you should treat me like a prostitute." - TotalBiscuit
Searz wrote:
Your assumption holds no weight since you seem to know very little about the difference between the two memory types.
found my source
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6972/xbox-one-hardware-compared-to-playstation-4/2
and yes im just blindly comparing numbers across, but bigger numbers are always better right?
I like things that make me feel stupid. - Ken Levine
caucheka wrote:
found my source
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6972/xbox-one-hardware-compared-to-playstation-4/2
and yes im just blindly comparing numbers across, but bigger numbers are always better right?
Total memory bandwidth is one of many numbers that decide the performance. Memory latency for example shines with its absence.
Overall though, it seems like the memory on the PS4 is more sensibly set up than the memory on the Xbox Lastone.
"He cooked cake." - MrCuddowls
"Oh forget it, I have nothing to hid, I admit it, 12 hours of every single day of my life ever since I was eleven years old have been anal sex with canoes" - MrCuddowls
"Oh forget it, I have nothing to hid, I admit it, 12 hours of every single day of my life ever since I was eleven years old have been anal sex with canoes" - MrCuddowls
Searz wrote:
Total memory bandwidth is one of many numbers that decide the performance. Memory latency for example shines with its absence.
Overall though, it seems like the memory on the PS4 is more sensibly set up than the memory on the Xbox Lastone.
i heard that out of the 8 gigs, ps4 games can use 7 of the 8 gigs, while xbone games can use only 5 of the 8.
I like things that make me feel stupid. - Ken Levine
You need to log in before commenting.
on top of that, one of the kinds of memory bandwith (been a while since i saw the comparison) was nearly 3 times bigger on the ps4 than the xbone.
Your assumption holds no weight since you seem to know very little about the difference between the two memory types.