Just so you know the #2 sig is the orange one.
The #3 sig is the joker one.
I don't think your comments really apply to the #3 sig so you probably got it wrong.
Wrath, can you make the post less confusing? Putting the sig number at exactly the same distance from 2 different sigs is very very very confusing. At least I was mislead by the post organization and I'm sure other people were too.
The #3 sig is the joker one.
I don't think your comments really apply to the #3 sig so you probably got it wrong.
Wrath, can you make the post less confusing? Putting the sig number at exactly the same distance from 2 different sigs is very very very confusing. At least I was mislead by the post organization and I'm sure other people were too.
I think most people can count to 7...
Where exactly the numbers are shouldn't make any difference, because if the top one is #1 then you can just count down to the one you want to vote for to find out what number it is.
As an aside: regardless of what you think of ANY of the sigs a comment like that is very rude.
Where exactly the numbers are shouldn't make any difference, because if the top one is #1 then you can just count down to the one you want to vote for to find out what number it is.
As an aside: regardless of what you think of ANY of the sigs a comment like that is very rude.
Bard, chill, he didn't mean to be rude, it is just when Secks said
"extremely well blend with focal and bg"
#3 is nice but doesn't have much blending, whereas 2 does, so you can kinda assume he is talking about 2...
and I'll fix the format I guess, but as Bard said, I didn't realize people can be so brain-numb to not realize which is which T_T
also I actually didn't make the sigs evenly spaced between the titles, it is just that with h1 it screws up the spacing T_T
I actually made the sig closer to the heading but it didn't show as that
and btw Secks those red specks in 7 aren't fractals, they are part of the original image T_T
"extremely well blend with focal and bg"
#3 is nice but doesn't have much blending, whereas 2 does, so you can kinda assume he is talking about 2...
and I'll fix the format I guess, but as Bard said, I didn't realize people can be so brain-numb to not realize which is which T_T
also I actually didn't make the sigs evenly spaced between the titles, it is just that with h1 it screws up the spacing T_T
I actually made the sig closer to the heading but it didn't show as that
and btw Secks those red specks in 7 aren't fractals, they are part of the original image T_T

Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
The_Nameless_Bard wrote:
I think most people can count to 7...
Where exactly the numbers are shouldn't make any difference, because if the top one is #1 then you can just count down to the one you want to vote for to find out what number it is.
As an aside: regardless of what you think of ANY of the sigs a comment like that is very rude.
Usually labels go below the picture, so when someone looks at a sig equally spaced from two labels it's common to assume that it's the bottom label that describes the image.
And I don't think it was rude. #3 lacks a focal point so his critic does not fit at all.
If he did want to vote for sig #3 then no harm has been done, if he wanted to vote for #2 then I think I was right to point it out.
You need to log in before commenting.
<Retired Moderator>