Warwick stealth nerf?

[quote=fistfather]I talk about his ult here. On this site its listed as striking five times for 0.33% wep dmg plus bla bla proccing on hit effects, which is why people build him with proc items like malady, wits end and mardres and black cleaver. However in game the tooltip just says it does flat magic dmg, 200/300/400 it is plus somehow scaling of AD in a way i cant figure out, altho it appears to be more than 1:1. It seems to me that the five attack procs perk has been removed but I cant find it in the patch notes anywhere and everyone still seems to believe that procwick is most viable. Can anyone shed some light on this issue?[/quote]

[quote=Lugignaf]The flat damage, I'm assuming, is based off the total damage it's doing in magic damage. The other stuff, I'm not sure a bout.[/quote]

[quote=fistfather]I just realized i coould check this myself with a custom game and it still procs for five attacks despite what the tooltip says.[/quote]

[quote=caucheka]it probably just says the total damage it deals. i'm going to guess the ad scale is 167%? which would make sense. as itused to do 33% ad plus 40/60/80 each tick for 5 ticks, which would amount to 167% plus 200/300/400 damage.[/quote]

[quote=PsiGuard]Am I the only one who found the title of this thread misleading? Sounded like they were nerfing warwick's stealth. ^^[/quote]

[quote=caucheka]a stealth nerf usually refers to a nerf that doesn't appear on the patch notes, usually from a bug.[/quote]

[quote=Luther3000]I noticed this earlier and was wondering about it. I'm pretty sure that the ult itself didn't change, it still seems to proc madred's and wit's end. I'm guessing they were just trying to simplify the wording, but I do wish they left in the part specifying that it worked with on-hit effects.[/quote]

[quote=PsiGuard]Thanks, but I figured that out when I actually read the OP. I just thought that the thread title was humorously ambiguous. Imagine if it was called "Evelynn Stealth Nerf?"[/quote]

[quote=caucheka]then it would be both. ahuehuheuhe[/quote]