What is +Rep? Why does it say...

[quote=jhoijhoi]omfg 1 +rep from 500!!!![/quote]

[quote=Wayne3100]Already +rep'd you for your new blog today (will probably give making a sig a shot later), so can't give you the 500th rep sorry :P[/quote]

[quote=jhoijhoi]lol <3 I really hope 500 is the next title, there's no way I'd get 1000 rep in my time here D:[/quote]

[quote=Wayne3100]Doesn't look like anything new D:[/quote]

[quote=jhoijhoi]D: D: D: Aw... [quote=matt]Higher titles become harder and harder to reach, and there are many that haven't been discovered yet![/quote] I guess getting the next title will be harder than I thought... I don't have the motivation to try for 600 or more. You'd think 500 is enough :P The leaps between each title is HUGE.[/quote]

[quote=Beeswarm17]I still say 1000. :D Then the next title will be at 9001. XD (Actually I think he's just been using an exponential curve, which is why I said it was higher than 500. The scaling difference just isn't high enough.)[/quote]

[quote=Wayne3100][list][*]title 1 (Notable) to 2 (Prominent) requires 3x the amount of Rep [*]title 2 to 3 (Distinguished) requires 3,33x the amount of Rep[/list] Next title will be at 3,66 * 200 = 732 :P[/quote]

[quote=Beeswarm17]There we go. Getting some proper math in this thread. About time. XD[/quote]

[quote=Wayne3100]meh, 732 is no good number. Maybe instead of increasing the number to multiply with by 0,33 every time I should multiply it by 1,11. Then someone would need..... 739,26 rep... lol nvm Where's the logic in this Matt? D:[/quote]

[quote=IceCreamy]Nope, still distinguished. Poor jhoi! :D[/quote]