You silly fillys, i shall present your tiny human brains the correct answer:

Some stupid people might argue that you can write it with a fractionbar(or whatever bruchstrich means in english), but they forgetz the x(2+1) part doesnt belong under the fraction bar, also for all people that still dont understand it, i suggest visiting a Math Class. But writing Fractionbar instead of / is still right.

Some stupid people might argue that you can write it with a fractionbar(or whatever bruchstrich means in english), but they forgetz the x(2+1) part doesnt belong under the fraction bar, also for all people that still dont understand it, i suggest visiting a Math Class. But writing Fractionbar instead of / is still right.
Xiron wrote:
But it's always brackets first...
Brackets first, and then just from left to right. How hard can it be...
DuffTime wrote:
ok ok plz carry me omg
i was only waiting for you to ask
Temzilla wrote:
Too hot to be icecream.
Luther3000 wrote:
He looks like a hair gel advert on legs
Toshabi wrote:
Icecreamy, with hair as slick and smooth as the ocean waves of Cocobana
To prove it 100 % :
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops.htm
multiplication and division are at the same rank
When you have a bunch of operations of the same rank, you just operate from left to right.
So the correct answer is 9.
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops.htm
Quoted:
multiplication and division are at the same rank
Quoted:
When you have a bunch of operations of the same rank, you just operate from left to right.
So the correct answer is 9.
DuffTime wrote:
ok ok plz carry me omg
i was only waiting for you to ask
Temzilla wrote:
Too hot to be icecream.
Luther3000 wrote:
He looks like a hair gel advert on legs
Toshabi wrote:
Icecreamy, with hair as slick and smooth as the ocean waves of Cocobana
6/2(1+2) needs to be written out clearer...
Could be:
6/(2(1+2)) = 6/(2(3)) = 1
In this case, you will of course do the parenthesis first then multiply then divide the whole thing.
Or:
(6/2)(1+2) = (3)(3) = 9
Left to right, you'll do division first then multiply whatever is in the parenthesis.
Could be:
6/(2(1+2)) = 6/(2(3)) = 1
In this case, you will of course do the parenthesis first then multiply then divide the whole thing.
Or:
(6/2)(1+2) = (3)(3) = 9
Left to right, you'll do division first then multiply whatever is in the parenthesis.
Sujing wrote:
6/2(1+2) needs to be written out clearer...
It is clear.
6/2(1+2) ==> 6/2*(1+2)
There are no other parenthesis. So it is NOT 6/(2(1+2)). It can't be. Where are you getting these parenthesis? You can't pull them out of your ***. They weren't in the original equation, so you can't add them later. Stop that.
There is no difference between fractions and division either. They are formats used for the sake of visual clarity. 2/3 is two-thirds and also two divided by three. It's the same thing. It's also 0.333333333333 repeated. 6/2 is a division operation.
The answer is 9. There is no question here. There is no "could be".
Mikuroo wrote:
it actually doesn't matter if you do multiplication or division first btw ...
Holy **** is this wrong. This is the source of this WHOLE DAMN CONFUSION. If you do the multiplication first, you end up with 1. This is alternatively known as the wrong answer. There would be no need for parenthesis if this was correct. The entire concept behind parenthetical notation was to dictate when you want certain multiplication and division operators to happen first.
You go from left to right, one by one, for each term as you come across them, following the order of operations. Parenthesis, exponents, multiplication and division operands, addition and subtraction operands. Multiplication and division operands are treated equally, as are addition and subtraction operands.
You need to log in before commenting.



http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=6%2F2*%281%2B2%29
There you go.
it's 9.
Ahhh, the site that solves everything :)