This debate... Going on like this, can only be described as the following:
> Pick a random number
> Square that number (Protip: Times the number with itself)
> Divide by the chosen number
> Subtract the chosen number from current number
> You arrived at the amount of ducks I give
> Pick a random number
> Square that number (Protip: Times the number with itself)
> Divide by the chosen number
> Subtract the chosen number from current number
> You arrived at the amount of ducks I give
Check out my comprehensive guide for Jax !!
-
Make sure to hit that +Rep button if I helped you out, and you feel I deserve it! :)
-
Make sure to hit that +Rep button if I helped you out, and you feel I deserve it! :)
So I guess old movies/music are all automatically worse than new movies/music because the technology has improved.
Owaitthatsnothowthingswork. I replied again, sue me.
Owaitthatsnothowthingswork. I replied again, sue me.
Canoas
<Member>
<Member>
No, but a movie in HD is better, that's why even old movies have HD versions. And in movies the special effects are even more important. Take avatar for example. The story sucked a lot, it was only a hit because the graphics were amazing.
And what does music have to do with anything? Did they invent new guitars with better sound?
At least try to make a good argument.
And what does music have to do with anything? Did they invent new guitars with better sound?
At least try to make a good argument.
Canoas
<Member>
<Member>
Okay, I'll try as hard as you.
I am right about everything, my opinion is fact and you are a big ****** if you disagree with me.
I am right about everything, my opinion is fact and you are a big ****** if you disagree with me.
Canoas
<Member>
<Member>
The fact that you can't argue your case proves you don't even believe in what you've said.
Oh, and please explain why Avatar has an 8.0 rating in imdb. If what you said is true and graphics don't matter then it would have received no more than a 5.
Oh, and please explain why Avatar has an 8.0 rating in imdb. If what you said is true and graphics don't matter then it would have received no more than a 5.
People.
Are.
Dumb.
Making any argument is a waste of time because you're already proven time and again you don't give a **** what other people think. If you can't be bothered to give other people any respect or accept their veiws then I won't give you that courtesy either. Now ima really stop replying to you for realsies this time.
Are.
Dumb.
Making any argument is a waste of time because you're already proven time and again you don't give a **** what other people think. If you can't be bothered to give other people any respect or accept their veiws then I won't give you that courtesy either. Now ima really stop replying to you for realsies this time.
Psychofrench
<Member>
<Member>
Well, you see, to today's standards, that game is probably worth a 1/10. To call them idiots is stretching it a little since they are pretty much judging it against their own standards, today's standards. I was already a teen when it first came out, I wouldn't give it a bad review because I would automatically replace into the context of my youth. You can't expect a 15 year old kid to remember a game that came out when his dad was probably still a virgin.
Movies are different, Art manages to be timeless, but in their case, unlike painting or music, they can benefit from a technological advance to make them more appealing (Even though they tend to suck more and more if you ask me). You could use the example of a television set. A set that was awesome 15 years ago would probably look like total garbage nowadays. I wouldn't pay 100 bucks for a 50" plasma I used to sell 9 years ago for 10Gs.
All this blah blah to get to this point. Your statement would sound less idiotic if you were able to put things back in perspective.
Movies are different, Art manages to be timeless, but in their case, unlike painting or music, they can benefit from a technological advance to make them more appealing (Even though they tend to suck more and more if you ask me). You could use the example of a television set. A set that was awesome 15 years ago would probably look like total garbage nowadays. I wouldn't pay 100 bucks for a 50" plasma I used to sell 9 years ago for 10Gs.
All this blah blah to get to this point. Your statement would sound less idiotic if you were able to put things back in perspective.
You need to log in before commenting.
<Altruistic Artist>