Not Updated For Current Season
This guide has not yet been updated for the current season. Please keep this in mind while reading. You can see the most recently updated guides on the browse guides page
x
x

Did this guide help you? If so please give them a vote or leave a comment.
You can even win prizes by doing so!
Vote
Comment
I liked this Guide

I didn't like this Guide




Your votes and comments encourage our guide authors to continue
creating helpful guides for the League of Legends community.
Long review
(Do not forget to vote! :D)
Thanks for the review, i tryed to correct my mistakes and add stuff. Also I PM'd you already. +Rep given and vote done!
7/10 item picks + structure
Structure seems fine (though boots at the end seems a bit weird).
I find Lich Bane and Nashors highly questionable picks though.
8/10 the rest
Not amazed by it, but it is fine.
Structure + coding: 6/15
3/10 uses of overviews, schemes and other uses of structure
@Changelog; This might eventually become a very big chapter (if you will keep putting effort in the guide), therefore, it would be better off as a spoiler, or as the final chapter in the guide.
@Summoner spells; Change the "with" title please.
@"Laning"; Might use some paragraph titles to help people find the information they need quickly.
Overal; Avoid changing the structure all the time. Either change it all to your runes structure or items structure
3/5 uses of coding
It's k
Content: 21/50
12/25 Full Build Quality Explanation
All basics about the build explained. However, you might want to add more alternatives to your runes and masteries, avoid oneline explanations like: "Those marks are pretty clear I suppose, you want to deal Magic Damage and this makes you bypass Magic Resist." and avoid stupid recommendations like: "So this item isn't great but if you want to build this, swap this with your offensive item selection.". Why would you even put something in your guide that doesn't work while you are aware of it? Why not put every damn item in the cheatsheet then?
7/20 Tactical Quality Explanation
First of all: "onjectives"
Second of all, your Laning section alone is not enough to serve as a tactical section. Add mid-game sections and late-game sections, or else your guide is just incomplete.
2/5 Quantity content
Its not that amazing.
Bonus: 8/15
0/5 bonus chapters (matchups and synergy chapters)
Nope
4/5 Originality
I guess it kinda is
4/5 attitude towards the readers (wants to improve)
Seems so yes
0/0 Comment to vote
Check
Result: Path of the Student (50/100)
You might want to put a lot of work in your explanations. Well actually, put a lot of work in everything.
Good luck.
(Do not forget to vote! :D)
But before I begin I want to say that my downvote on this guide was justified. I am not the kind of person that goes to a random guide and downvotes it for no reason. I am not evil or something like that. I always have my reasons but not necessarily the time to write a full length review on every guide I see. So if you are not confident with my comment or vote you can always PM me or go to my review shop (what you just did) and ask for a more detailed review.
If you have your moral destroyed by some downvotes you wont get far here. My Diana guide also got a lot of downvotes early but I didn't give up. I took the criticism seriously and improved my guide.
Cheatsheet 6/10
Your cheatsheet is okay. Your item picks are not bad though I am not a big fan of your build. I doubt that you will ever have success with that in solo queue because it will only work in certain team comps.
No mention of:
I know you are going 13 in offense masteries for
9/21/0 would be much better imo.
And btw if you are focusing on an attackspeed/ap build consider maxing
Content 6/10
Thought you made some Major improvements to this guide there's still a lot missing.
Several one line explanations in runes section and also very short explanations throughout the whole guide.
Missing: Matchups, detailed explanation of gameplay.
Somewhere in your introduction you say that this build works best in certain teamcomps but never mention what these team comps are.
Coding/Appearance 6/10
Your coding is decent but not too good. You could arrange some things better and avoid walls of text like in the early-game section. Try learning some more advanced BBCoding to improve that.
Total Score 18/30
Though you have made some improvements to this guide there's still a lot missing. Add more content, explain your build and gameplay more detailed and improve your coding.
The Ambition of a guidewriter should be to help players. You want to do this buy providing them with a build and detailed explanations for a certain champions. The purpose of a guide is not just to share some new original item build. Always keep that in mind.
Result: No vote (I removed my downvote because of the improvements you already made but I still wont upvote. If you are making some more improvements I may still come back and change my opinion)
Cheatsheet: 16/20
8/10 item picks + structure
You don't have any other boots included while
8/10 the rest
I don't think
Structure + coding: 10/15
7/10 uses of overviews, schemes and other uses of structure
It's clear and smooth but I really like to see something fancy in guides, too. There are walls of text too (or they look like one.)
3/5 uses of coding
Nothing too fancy, basic coding after all.
Content: /50
23/25 Full Build Quality Explanation
Well, you do explain them quite thoroughly and the explanations seem to be correct. You could still add more items to it, it's kinda empty.
10/20 Tactical Quality Explanation
Only early game. This is a huge "-" in this guide. I prefer adding them fast. This also affects "Quantity Content" so you lost many points because of it.
3/5 Quantity content
There really isn't lots of it.
Bonus: /10
0/5 bonus chapters (matchups and synergy chapters)
No, no and no.
5/5 attitude towards the readers (wants to improve)
You probably want to improve but you should've done it earlier. (When you were making it.)
0/0 Comment to vote
Result:
Path of the Successor
+Rep is always appreciated ;)
If you had really read the guide, you could see the other boots in itemization, if you read the Masteries section, you could see why i have
8/10 item picks + structure
You don't have any other boots included while
8/10 the rest
I don't think
Structure + coding: 10/15
7/10 uses of overviews, schemes and other uses of structure
It's clear and smooth but I really like to see something fancy in guides, too. There are walls of text too (or they look like one.)
3/5 uses of coding
Nothing too fancy, basic coding after all.
Content: /50
23/25 Full Build Quality Explanation
Well, you do explain them quite thoroughly and the explanations seem to be correct. You could still add more items to it, it's kinda empty.
10/20 Tactical Quality Explanation
Only early game. This is a huge "-" in this guide. I prefer adding them fast. This also affects "Quantity Content" so you lost many points because of it.
3/5 Quantity content
There really isn't lots of it.
Bonus: /10
0/5 bonus chapters (matchups and synergy chapters)
No, no and no.
5/5 attitude towards the readers (wants to improve)
You probably want to improve but you should've done it earlier. (When you were making it.)
0/0 Comment to vote
Result:
Path of the Successor
+Rep is always appreciated ;)
This looks very promising. Good choices in runes, items and masteries, and everything is explained in the guide. Well done! :D
Thanks for the positive feedback, looks like I'm done for now, I'll look if any changes in my Build happens. (Items, skills, masteries, runes)
I actually enjoy seeing someone make use of the
I've played AtkSpd Cho'g for a while just to have fun, but it can actually be viable with your build. (Not nearly as fun though :b )
Yeah, it was more of a fun build before but i took a look at the build and said, omg what is that
I've played AtkSpd Cho'g for a while just to have fun, but it can actually be viable with your build. (Not nearly as fun though :b )