Searz wrote:
Ah, that's kind of what I figured. The quality of a service and the photos is of less importance when the quality of the pictures being shared is low.
I just wish people would advertise services according to their merits rather than their popularity.
Popularity can be a merit. None of the famous people I follow on IG/Twitter use any of your aforementioned apps. When it comes to sharing services, popularity is a merit, since the more people that use it, the more likely that someone you will want to follow will be using it, especially when it's a trending service like IG. There's no real reason why I absolutely must have HQ/HD pictures/videos if it's not what I'm looking for.
But it's true, the sharing service really really sucks hardcore.
bought some lipstick online and it arrived today :D

I love the color, but I kinda feel it needs make-up to go with it because of how dark it looks on me.
EDIT: Yep, teeny bit of make-up goes a long way

I love the color, but I kinda feel it needs make-up to go with it because of how dark it looks on me.
EDIT: Yep, teeny bit of make-up goes a long way

TROLLing1999 wrote:
What kind of festival is it?
i just learned my 2nd word in Finnish-the first is suomi
The biggest Christian festival in the entire Europe :p (at least according to them)
TROLLing1999 wrote:
Christian Festival? What does one do thete?
Meet people and get hugs (500+ hugged people and 7 numbers this weekend ;) ) and listen to rock/metalgospel :p

You need to log in before commenting.
Seems sucky. I think Photos has a good amount of editing options, I think it comes with Google+, so try downloading that if you want something that probably does a far better job than Candy Camera.
And I meant that it makes sense for the editing options to be in the gallery app rather than in the camera app.
I'll have to check out the Google+ photos app then, also I kinda like having editing options built in, it's nice and convenient, besides I don't do hardcore photo editing, just a filter and i'm good