OTGBionicArm wrote:
I am very proud of your self restraint.
Thank you.
I'm a strong independent black mage who don't need no mana.
jhoijhoi wrote:
Don't diss the headset though, it has surround sound
Aww <3, I helped contribute to that
If you found me helpful give me some +Rep :)
Signature Shop!|Tryndamere Guide|Rengar Guide
Embrace the shadow... we got cookies and signatures, and all you have to do is stop by LaCorpse's Signature Café
Embrace the shadow... we got cookies and signatures, and all you have to do is stop by LaCorpse's Signature Café
Gonna double post here because I too have something I bought that I want to show. So here is how it is gonna work, we can derail like we did before and get the thread locked, OR, we can simply stay on topic with the thread.
I recently bought a wool casual blazer, it looks really nice and a bunch of my friends really liked it as well. I wore it today and decided it would be cool to show you guys/gals, without further ado here is the photo, apologies for potato quality 5MP camera is not enough.
I recently bought a wool casual blazer, it looks really nice and a bunch of my friends really liked it as well. I wore it today and decided it would be cool to show you guys/gals, without further ado here is the photo, apologies for potato quality 5MP camera is not enough.
If you found me helpful give me some +Rep :)
IPodPulse wrote:
So here is how it is gonna work, we can derail like we did before and get the thread locked, OR, we can simply stay on topic with the thread.
Tip for the future: don't bring it up again.. It's far more likely to derail if you bring it up than if you refrain from doing so.
Quoted:
apologies for potato quality 5MP camera is not enough.
P.S: Megapixels have almost nothing to do with picture quality.
"I sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being a helicopter is Impossible and I’m ****ing ******ed but I don’t care, I’m beautiful. I’m having a plastic surgeon install rotary blades, 30 mm cannons and AMG-114 Hellfire missiles on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me “Apache†and respect my right to kill from above and kill needlessly. If you can’t accept me you’re a heliphobe and need to check your vehicle privilege. Thank you for being so understanding." - Guuse
"uh, I identify as counterstrike and I find this globally offensive" - ???
"uh, I identify as counterstrike and I find this globally offensive" - ???
|
Imma 'bout to end this man's whole career My rather unimpressive and slowly growing anime list! Currently watching:
Nisekoi: False Love |
|
HiFromBuddha wrote:
TIL
No kidding, I always thought the higher the MP the better the camera quality
If you found me helpful give me some +Rep :)
There's a threshold where you won't be able to detect an increase in resolution and it depends on the size of the image. 5 megapixels is more than enough for a picture that size, but if you tried to display it with the same resolution on a movie screen, it'd look terrible. But yeah, for the average sized image you're not going to need a whole lot of pixels.
TormentedTurnip wrote:
There's a threshold where you won't be able to detect an increase in resolution and it depends on the size of the image. 5 megapixels is more than enough for a picture that size, but if you tried to display it with the same resolution on a movie screen, it'd look terrible. But yeah, for the average sized image you're not going to need a whole lot of pixels.
The original size was 972x1296, I had to scale it down to avoid having the terrible quality. it's not that bad now but it was god awful when you see it normnally
If you found me helpful give me some +Rep :)
I'm just gonna address this quickly to avoid derailing. If you want me to create a topic about it I can, just holler and I'll create a little introduction to camera specifications.
Above a threshold of around 2-4MP it doesn't make much difference on most screens.
It does make difference if you want to zoom or crop the picture however. But 5-8MP should be plenty enough for anybody, at least in a phone.
Hence why for example the iPhone 6 has one of the best mobile cameras on the market right now despite only having 8MP compared to the 13-20MP cameras in competing phones. (it has other problems tho, like terrible screen-to-bezel ratio)
What matters far more is the area per pixel. Which is greatly influenced by the sensor size.
This is the reason why DSLRs and Mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras are far superior phone cameras even if the camera has 12-18MP while the phone has 20MP; because they have more than 10 times as much sensor area per pixel.
One can get a rough proportion of this by dividing the area of the sensor by the number of pixels.
I'll go into more detail in the eventual thread, if you want me to.
I gotta go sleep now.
Did you take it using some kind of app? That only further reduces the quality of the photo. I recommend against such things.
IPodPulse wrote:
No kidding, I always thought the higher the MP the better the camera quality
Above a threshold of around 2-4MP it doesn't make much difference on most screens.
It does make difference if you want to zoom or crop the picture however. But 5-8MP should be plenty enough for anybody, at least in a phone.
Hence why for example the iPhone 6 has one of the best mobile cameras on the market right now despite only having 8MP compared to the 13-20MP cameras in competing phones. (it has other problems tho, like terrible screen-to-bezel ratio)
What matters far more is the area per pixel. Which is greatly influenced by the sensor size.
This is the reason why DSLRs and Mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras are far superior phone cameras even if the camera has 12-18MP while the phone has 20MP; because they have more than 10 times as much sensor area per pixel.
One can get a rough proportion of this by dividing the area of the sensor by the number of pixels.
I'll go into more detail in the eventual thread, if you want me to.
I gotta go sleep now.
IPodPulse wrote:
The original size was 972x1296, I had to scale it down to avoid having the terrible quality. it's not that bad now but it was god awful when you see it normnally
Did you take it using some kind of app? That only further reduces the quality of the photo. I recommend against such things.
You need to log in before commenting.
*twitch*
I am very proud of your self restraint.