OTGBionicArm wrote:
I am very proud of your self restraint.
Thank you.
Sittin' on chimneys, putting fire up my ***.
"I biked 12km in a blizzard today and mice are chewing on my chocolate bars. Life's good."
"I biked 12km in a blizzard today and mice are chewing on my chocolate bars. Life's good."
jhoijhoi wrote:
Don't diss the headset though, it has surround sound
Aww <3, I helped contribute to that
If you found me helpful give me some +Rep :)
Gonna double post here because I too have something I bought that I want to show. So here is how it is gonna work, we can derail like we did before and get the thread locked, OR, we can simply stay on topic with the thread.
I recently bought a wool casual blazer, it looks really nice and a bunch of my friends really liked it as well. I wore it today and decided it would be cool to show you guys/gals, without further ado here is the photo, apologies for potato quality 5MP camera is not enough.
I recently bought a wool casual blazer, it looks really nice and a bunch of my friends really liked it as well. I wore it today and decided it would be cool to show you guys/gals, without further ado here is the photo, apologies for potato quality 5MP camera is not enough.
If you found me helpful give me some +Rep :)
Signature Shop!|Tryndamere Guide|Rengar Guide
Run out of zen for a signature? Stop by The_Nameless_Bard for a custom signature, all you have to do is ask!
Run out of zen for a signature? Stop by The_Nameless_Bard for a custom signature, all you have to do is ask!
IPodPulse wrote:
So here is how it is gonna work, we can derail like we did before and get the thread locked, OR, we can simply stay on topic with the thread.
Tip for the future: don't bring it up again.. It's far more likely to derail if you bring it up than if you refrain from doing so.
Quoted:
apologies for potato quality 5MP camera is not enough.
P.S: Megapixels have almost nothing to do with picture quality.
"Blizzard spoke thus; Thou shalt not BM. And the players replied Nay, I shall Play my hand with Lethal already on the board. And so Blizzard sent unto them this Brawl of Yogg, As a lesson for their sins of Pride and Greed, for he is the Prophet of Madness and RNG. On that day, the tavern descended into an era of chaos and darkness, until the weekend passed and everyone forgot all about it. Amen. Book of SMOrc, Verse 20, Chapter 4." - Feam T
|
Imma 'bout to end this man's whole career My rather unimpressive and slowly growing anime list! Currently watching:
Nisekoi: False Love |
|
HiFromBuddha wrote:
TIL
No kidding, I always thought the higher the MP the better the camera quality
If you found me helpful give me some +Rep :)
Signature Shop!|Tryndamere Guide|Rengar Guide
Let the hunt begin! And by hunt I mean signature finding, so why don't you check out Ubnoxius's signature shop for some signatures?
Let the hunt begin! And by hunt I mean signature finding, so why don't you check out Ubnoxius's signature shop for some signatures?
There's a threshold where you won't be able to detect an increase in resolution and it depends on the size of the image. 5 megapixels is more than enough for a picture that size, but if you tried to display it with the same resolution on a movie screen, it'd look terrible. But yeah, for the average sized image you're not going to need a whole lot of pixels.
TormentedTurnip wrote:
There's a threshold where you won't be able to detect an increase in resolution and it depends on the size of the image. 5 megapixels is more than enough for a picture that size, but if you tried to display it with the same resolution on a movie screen, it'd look terrible. But yeah, for the average sized image you're not going to need a whole lot of pixels.
The original size was 972x1296, I had to scale it down to avoid having the terrible quality. it's not that bad now but it was god awful when you see it normnally
If you found me helpful give me some +Rep :)
I'm just gonna address this quickly to avoid derailing. If you want me to create a topic about it I can, just holler and I'll create a little introduction to camera specifications.
Above a threshold of around 2-4MP it doesn't make much difference on most screens.
It does make difference if you want to zoom or crop the picture however. But 5-8MP should be plenty enough for anybody, at least in a phone.
Hence why for example the iPhone 6 has one of the best mobile cameras on the market right now despite only having 8MP compared to the 13-20MP cameras in competing phones. (it has other problems tho, like terrible screen-to-bezel ratio)
What matters far more is the area per pixel. Which is greatly influenced by the sensor size.
This is the reason why DSLRs and Mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras are far superior phone cameras even if the camera has 12-18MP while the phone has 20MP; because they have more than 10 times as much sensor area per pixel.
One can get a rough proportion of this by dividing the area of the sensor by the number of pixels.
I'll go into more detail in the eventual thread, if you want me to.
I gotta go sleep now.
Did you take it using some kind of app? That only further reduces the quality of the photo. I recommend against such things.
IPodPulse wrote:
No kidding, I always thought the higher the MP the better the camera quality
Above a threshold of around 2-4MP it doesn't make much difference on most screens.
It does make difference if you want to zoom or crop the picture however. But 5-8MP should be plenty enough for anybody, at least in a phone.
Hence why for example the iPhone 6 has one of the best mobile cameras on the market right now despite only having 8MP compared to the 13-20MP cameras in competing phones. (it has other problems tho, like terrible screen-to-bezel ratio)
What matters far more is the area per pixel. Which is greatly influenced by the sensor size.
This is the reason why DSLRs and Mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras are far superior phone cameras even if the camera has 12-18MP while the phone has 20MP; because they have more than 10 times as much sensor area per pixel.
One can get a rough proportion of this by dividing the area of the sensor by the number of pixels.
I'll go into more detail in the eventual thread, if you want me to.
I gotta go sleep now.
IPodPulse wrote:
The original size was 972x1296, I had to scale it down to avoid having the terrible quality. it's not that bad now but it was god awful when you see it normnally
Did you take it using some kind of app? That only further reduces the quality of the photo. I recommend against such things.
"If someone is ****, you point at them and declare "****!". Because this is the internet." - Serpentiferous
"The Internet: where men are men, women are men, and little girls are the FBI." - ???
"The Internet: where men are men, women are men, and little girls are the FBI." - ???
You need to log in before commenting.
*twitch*
I am very proud of your self restraint.