Greynade wrote:
^^^^
I would rather remake it and try to do it higher quality than use topaz.
Can't count how many times I've drawn over renders to improve quality instead of using topaz.
![](/images/spacer.png)
No its just the fact that the majority of highly skilled graphic designers are upset that they spend ages providing a unique outlook on their work, and also aiding quality.... whilst on the other side of the sea, a low skilled graphics user can just use topaz tool to do the same effect in under 1 minute.
Everyone can agree that too much topaz is bad, but when used correctly and also even if you use at a lower opacity it can help.
Dunno why people get so mad over it. I'd rather just de-noise at a low opacity with topaz than spend hours with surface blur to fix something so trivial as "noise". etc.
The rule with topaz is...don't over use it and don't depend on it.
Everyone can agree that too much topaz is bad, but when used correctly and also even if you use at a lower opacity it can help.
Dunno why people get so mad over it. I'd rather just de-noise at a low opacity with topaz than spend hours with surface blur to fix something so trivial as "noise". etc.
The rule with topaz is...don't over use it and don't depend on it.
You need to log in before commenting.
<Member>
♥ ລາàºà»€àºŠàº±àº™! ♥