Did you enjoy the review I had given?
I wish I had guides for you to review. If you want to attract "customers" however, I'd recommend you to review some new guides randomly. You can test out your review scheme, we can see it whether we like it or not and people can improve their guides. A win-win-win scenario :P
Change is gooooood
Picture by: Bludes
Want to advertise your guide, but don't know where? Click here for an opportunity of a lifetime!
I like that introduction banner ;)
I also really like your review schemes. I would ask for a review on one of my guides, but I'm afraid they haven't been updated in a while. So they're probably out of date. Once I update, I'll be sure to drop by!
I also really like your review schemes. I would ask for a review on one of my guides, but I'm afraid they haven't been updated in a while. So they're probably out of date. Once I update, I'll be sure to drop by!
jhoijhoi wrote:
+rep! Hope your shop thrives, and good luck :) (I may come in for a Harvard review one day ^^)
Why thank you! Didn't even do a review yet, and I get +Rep! I'll take it!
Wayne3100 wrote:
pls ._.
Good luck reviewing! :)
Not sure what you meant by the please, but thank you!
Janitsu wrote:
I don't need any reviews yet but after I've updated my guides (fully) I will probably ask for one.
I look forward to it. Thanks for the sig!
Meiyjhe wrote:
I wish I had guides for you to review. If you want to attract "customers" however, I'd recommend you to review some new guides randomly. You can test out your review scheme, we can see it whether we like it or not and people can improve their guides. A win-win-win scenario :P
Good idea. Thanks for the advice!
Quoted:
I like that introduction banner ;)
I also really like your review schemes. I would ask for a review on one of my guides, but I'm afraid they haven't been updated in a while. So they're probably out of date. Once I update, I'll be sure to drop by!
Well ****! I'm sorry Emi. I forgot to credit you for the opening picture. I'll be sure to change that. :D
Yes, that is Morgana. A thank you to Ubnoxius for this sig!
Electro522 wrote:
Not sure what you meant by the please, but thank you!
"Do take note that my reviews will focus more on grammar, presentation etc."
Electro522 wrote:
more then enough
Electro522 wrote:
then
Pretty much that :P
Your review would basically allow the worst **** guide out there to get a 1000/1000.
Just because its pretty, not written by an idiot and well organised.
You can focus on grammar etc.. sure but the actual content is what's important, looks come second.
Other than that a good idea, but you really should include content and if your level of play doesn't allow that you might just wanna name it a "Spell check and art review service" or something like that.
Just my 2cents~
Just because its pretty, not written by an idiot and well organised.
You can focus on grammar etc.. sure but the actual content is what's important, looks come second.
Other than that a good idea, but you really should include content and if your level of play doesn't allow that you might just wanna name it a "Spell check and art review service" or something like that.
Just my 2cents~
~ Sig by Xiaowiriamu ~
Somewhat agreed with Koksei in that content > presentation, but I think OP made it quite clear he only focuses on that.
On that note, I'd actually love someone to have a look over my guides and check for grammar errors and presentation related stuff since I'm not a native English speaker. I honestly don't care about formats but if you feel bored, feel free to do a full Harvard review. So, to follow your review format:
Order type: The Harvard (but feel free to do anything you like really)
Link: http://www.mobafire.com/league-of-legends/build/how-to-be-victorious-as-elise-a-high-elo-jungle-guide-381716
Description: High Elo jungle Elise guide, recently updated to 4.10. Supportive build with lots of CDR
Also, just a friendly warning:
I'd recommend you to review some new guides randomly.
A lot of guide authors don't bother checking their guides for comments or barely put any work in it at all. I'd advise you to carefully check the guides you decide to review and most certainly don't waste your time on huge reviews unless they ask for it because else you risk all your hard work going to waste. I also wouldn't bother with scores too much but just write down what they can improve on. Get a link to your review shop in your sig and they'll click on it if they want to know more. That's at least what always worked for me.
On that note, I'd actually love someone to have a look over my guides and check for grammar errors and presentation related stuff since I'm not a native English speaker. I honestly don't care about formats but if you feel bored, feel free to do a full Harvard review. So, to follow your review format:
Order type: The Harvard (but feel free to do anything you like really)
Link: http://www.mobafire.com/league-of-legends/build/how-to-be-victorious-as-elise-a-high-elo-jungle-guide-381716
Description: High Elo jungle
Elise guide, recently updated to 4.10. Supportive build with lots of CDRAlso, just a friendly warning:
Quoted:
I'd recommend you to review some new guides randomly.
A lot of guide authors don't bother checking their guides for comments or barely put any work in it at all. I'd advise you to carefully check the guides you decide to review and most certainly don't waste your time on huge reviews unless they ask for it because else you risk all your hard work going to waste. I also wouldn't bother with scores too much but just write down what they can improve on. Get a link to your review shop in your sig and they'll click on it if they want to know more. That's at least what always worked for me.
You need to log in before commenting.
- Must be level 30 (doesn't matter what elo you are in)
- Guide must be a minimum of 3 days old
- Must have a minimum of 25 forum posts
- Must follow review request form
Guide URL: (you MUST provide the URL. If you have it linked in your signature, that is fine)
Description: (give a very brief summary/description of your guide)
The Standard: My most basic review. I will give you a score out of 10, and simply list things you did well and/or things you could improve on. I will give no vote, nor any rep if this review is requested.
The Test: This review will have a total score of 100 points, divided amongst 3 categories: Presentation(40 points), Grammar/Spelling(30 points), and Organization(30 points). If you receive 50 points or less, you shall receive a down vote with your score. If you receive 51 points to 75, you shall get no vote whatsoever. If you receive 76 points or more, you shall receive an upvote, and even a +Rep if you get 95 or higher. I will also give details as to what you did well and what could be improved on in each category. You can compare this to an everyday school test.
The Harvard: This review is my most in depth, having a total score of 1000 points. It is divided into the same 3 categories as The Test, but each category is divided into their own sub-categories.
- Presentation (400 Total points)
- Use of Art (150 points)
- Use of Coding (100 points)
- Cheat Sheet (50 points)
- Champion Presentation (100 points)
- Grammar/Spelling (300 Total points, all sub-categories worth 150 points)
- Grammar
- Spelling
- Organization (300 Total points, all sub-categories worth 150 points)
- Chapters
- Information
I shall give explanations for each sub-category as to what you did well, or what you need to improve on. A down vote will be received with 400 points or less. No vote will be given if you receive anything between 401 to 700 points. 701 points or more shall receive an upvote, and a +Rep with a score of 901 or more.Please do take note that if you do request this review, it might take a few days to complete, due to how thorough I will be. I will also only do one Harvard Review at a time (I shall let anyone who has requested one know through a pm if I am currently working on one). However, I will be willing to do either of the 2 other reviews at any time.