Section on uniques

[quote=theBMB]Hey guys, I added a section on the ever confusing "unique" keyword to my items guide and I need some confirmation on the information I've put in to make sure it's all correct. Anything I'm not completely sure about is gleaned from discussions in theorycrafting, so there's a little bit of testing that needs to be done to be absolutely sure. Namely I need you to look at the Unique auras and special cases sections. If there is any misinformation or extra cases I need to know about, please let me know here or post a comment on the guide. Thanks (second link in sig)[/quote]

[quote=SirSpankAlot]Woot loooks good:D Now i can tell people they shouldnt stack sunfires cuz thebmb said it.[/quote]

[quote=theBMB][youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR6J0r4LHHI&feature=related] this is why they made it unique[/quote]

[quote=Lugignaf]You need to do some updating on it. QSS is now unique. Also, Madred's Razors stacks with Wriggles although it is 2 separate procs and you can hit for 500 twice in one hit.[/quote]

[quote=theBMB]o then mobafire needs to be updated as well, because the database says its not unique. I coulda swore that one of the patch notes said that the passives for wriggles and razors would not work with eachother, have you actually seen two procs for 500 in one hit?[/quote]

[quote=Lugignaf]Wait, nvm. I thought it could... Maybe that was just a dream or something. I think it migh have been DuffTime who said it too. IDK anymore. But, I know for a fact that QSS is unique now. It was OP without unique status.[/quote]

[quote=theBMB]Ok i'll have to test that wriggle's thing in game then[/quote]

[quote=PsiGuard][quote=Lugignaf] QSS is now unique. [/quote] But what does that MEAN???!![/quote]

[quote=Lugignaf]Really? It means you can have 6 purely for the MR but, only one of the actives will work.[/quote]

[quote=theBMB]lol i think he's trolling, especially since he could've found out by, you know, going to my guide. But I just tested it out. With ww and a wriggle's and a razors, it was nearly impossible to tell. At times, it seems like the passive 500 damage was happening more often, but at other times it didn't. It's almost impossible to test experimentally since you're relying on a 20% chance and 15% chance to coincide with each other (and i'm pretty sure the statistical probability of that happening is actually much lower than just 15% * 20%). If the two items did seperate amounts of damage (one doing 500, the other doing 550 or something) it would be much easier to tell. For now I'm gonna have to leave this problem open.[/quote]