The problem isnt that cait is overpowered....

[quote=Dyto]Its that shes probably the only ranged AD at the right place of balance compared to melee AD champions and assassins[/quote]

[quote=Fruxo]Comparing a Marksman to an Assassin is not the same thing.[/quote]

[quote=Dyto][quote=Fruxo]Comparing a Marksman to an Assassin is not the same thing.[/quote] Duh they're not the same thing, but both should have equal power output based on whatever aspects each should have exagerated or muted, right now assassins have no drawbacks the same way as ranged AD champions, assassins are essentially "Mistake erasers" because thye're given WAY morre options than other champions, and mind you Im not saying "omfg no fair their damage is higher!" Im saying, their damage is higher, their survivability is higher, their mobility is better, the list goes on but they ALWAYS win and the ONLY thing ranged ADs have is a ranged autoattck, which is LITERALLY negated through assassin mobility. Before you say it , "But these champions take more skill!" first of all, thats a highly objective thing to say, I personally feel a champion given tools for everythig is in a far better position than a champion given one tool in 4 different forms. Yes, playing veigar and being successful is MUCH harder than playing yasuo and being successful, thats just a fact because of the limitations of his kit, and no there are no champions whose kit is mechanically a blockade to certain players, they are ALL roughly about the same difficulty, the difference is how they are balanced ... 3 Star champs are balanced so their WORST players are roughly able to do what the average 2 star does, a 2 star is just the average 2 star, and a 1 star is balanced on their very best players, THATS how games balance around player skill I know BECAUSE I DID IT FOR LIKE 10 YEARS! Its an assinine defense of something we add to objectively just make things more entertaining to watch.[/quote]