Well,
for once I actually liked how it ended, prolly because there was no romance as in most shounen and they choose the 'friends with everyone'-end...
Ofc. it is just romance teasing zzzz.
Back to KLK:
Well, happy ending, how else and rlly awesome :3
Trigger knows how to make endings epic tho xD just like in TTGL
for once I actually liked how it ended, prolly because there was no romance as in most shounen and they choose the 'friends with everyone'-end...
Ofc. it is just romance teasing zzzz.
Back to KLK:
Well, happy ending, how else and rlly awesome :3
Trigger knows how to make endings epic tho xD just like in TTGL
In retrospect, Trigger really needed to make Kill la Kill either 1-cour or not undertake it with so little funding; while they did a phenomenal job with creating an awesome show without the financial freedom of the likes of KyoAni, I feel that the show was overall held back from perfection by a shortage of funding (remember the original NGE's ending episodes?), as well as a distinct inhomogeneous pacing and inadequate character development arcs that don't match the resolution. I'll be damned, though, if anyone says it wasn't an awesome show. The female leads are GODLIKE, never seen characterization done this well in an action-oriented anime. Usually you get fanservicey useless ******** sub-human beings like Yoko "I did nothing" Littner (yes I hate her, deal with it) with female leads. Not with Kill la Kill.
9/10, watch it before you lose your way.
In unrelated news, I want that BD set so badly but alas, I have no money to throw around. Could be very worth buying if the BD fixed up the "no budget" moments in the original show, since off-model animation does happen quite a bit.
9/10, watch it before you lose your way.
In unrelated news, I want that BD set so badly but alas, I have no money to throw around. Could be very worth buying if the BD fixed up the "no budget" moments in the original show, since off-model animation does happen quite a bit.
(spoilers) Meanwhile at /a/
xIchi wrote:
I didn't gather any information about the funding, but I guess they made good use of the style and I have to agree to you, tho I never ever really watched NGE (oh snap).
If you carefully looked you'll notice that the actual amount of animation is really low most of the time. Oftentimes you get painted still frames taking up a lot of the airtime, but because it's executed well the lack of animation doesn't really hinder the viewing experience.
(Spoiler) They also ran out of money during
Also E4 was an obvious "No Budget Episode". Must've spent it all on the action scenes in episode 3. Not that I mind, of course; it was very entertaining. It's great when a studio embraces the medium of animation and uses it to pull of ridiculousness that isn't otherwise possible, instead of trying to make it realistic; that's true anime in my eyes. If you don't use the freedom of drawn art to its fullest, you might as well just make a live action show.
Watching Steins;Gate. Amazing series overall so far, but it feels a bit like Lord Of The Rings. That elf is a guy, that dwarf is a girl and eagles solve everything. Though plot holes are lurking behind every corner.
EDIT: Question:
Spoiler: Click to view
EDIT: Question:
Spoiler: Click to view
********'s a pretty good fertilizer
Latest Legend wrote:
Watching Steins;Gate. Amazing series overall so far, but it feels a bit like Lord Of The Rings. That elf is a guy, that dwarf is a girl and eagles solve everything. Though plot holes are lurking behind every corner.
Spoiler: Click to view
Yeah, you're absolutely right. The blunder with the relatioship not resetting being kind of a big deal, but I can see past the other blunders and suspend my disbelief. I can however not for the ending and the ending of the turn-back arc.
The ending almost ruined the series for me.
Watch the entire thing before reading this:
Quoted:
And how a world line can be completely different from the previous while the situation in the lab is completely the same.
This can probably be explained, but in a way that would be less likely and more convoluted than if it was not that way.
A way of explaining it would be selective traveling, as in they only went to branching lines that did not differ in regard. But that would be a pretty important thing to gloss over..
Quoted:
If a world line moves, does that mean that the other world line doesn't "exist" anymore? I mean, if someone prevents something from happening in world line #x, are there observers/inhabitants of world line #y who do experience that thing to happen? Or is there only one entity of every person and does changing world lines equal to something like hopping on to the next train?
It's not the world-lines moving, it's Okabe moving from one to another. All the world-lines exist at the same time, but they have no contact other than where they branch.
"You can't have your privacy violated if you don't know your privacy is violated." - Mike Rogers, U.S. Representative for Michigan's 8th congressional district, 2013
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
You need to log in before commenting.
<Retired Moderator>