caucheka wrote:
she lacks self-respect because she values traditional family virtues? because she wants to be a stay-at-home mom and raise kids like a woman is supposed to? because she wants a man who can stand up and be a ********ed man to provide for her and said kids?
I think you're a bit heavy on the rhetoric, bro. Try to answer a question with an answer, not tangentially related(at best) questions. This comment is just one big straw man. Straw men seem to be your favorite mode of fallacy..
Allow me to clarify: is she aware of your sexist/anti-womens'-rights and racist tendencies? Is she okay with them?
If so: Happy you found somebody as racist and sexist as you are. Keep on perpetuating the hate, the world needs more of it!
Toshabi wrote:
This is about what you got from Christmas. So shut the **** up and get back on topic or I'm sitting on you.
OOoOoOoo, please sit on my face Toshabi-sama!
"You can't have your privacy violated if you don't know your privacy is violated." - Mike Rogers, U.S. Representative for Michigan's 8th congressional district, 2013
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
>:^[
MrCuddowls wrote:
Hahahaha telling me my items are bad HHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAhA
Listen buddy don't judge someone's items if your only level 13
This build is Platinum approved, Thats all you need to know
Idk, but caucheka answered perfectly to your question.
I mean, all the question he put out were mostly clarifying how his gf looks at family and her standpoint especially pointing out the parts where femenism/femenazis try to extremely change the structure.
Right now, you are just a big *** hypocrite, Searz.
I mean, all the question he put out were mostly clarifying how his gf looks at family and her standpoint especially pointing out the parts where femenism/femenazis try to extremely change the structure.
Right now, you are just a big *** hypocrite, Searz.

I don't even understand why he had to derail a thread with this ****. I guess if the woman isn't the main household provider, earning the most income and wears the pants in the relationship, Caucheka is sexist.
caucheka wrote:
she lacks self-respect because she values traditional family virtues? because she wants to be a stay-at-home mom and raise kids like a woman is supposed to? because she wants a man who can stand up and be a ********ed man to provide for her and said kids?
Toshabi wrote:
I guess if the woman isn't the main household provider, earning the most income and wears the pants in the relationship, Caucheka is sexist.
on topic: I forgot I got an adorable baby griffon plush and some chocolates. And a bit of spending cash from my grandparents. My grandmother has a skewed idea of what size clothes people wear and I end up with sweaters and such in size XL that I swim in and never wear if she actually picks things out for me herself. X.X
Bard pretty much nailed it. It's all about choice and if a woman doesn't want to fit the role then she should be allowed to do so.
You just presented a false dilemma. Please stop using fallacies.
He didn't even post an answer. He posted a series of questions, which even if assumed rhetorical don't even answer the initial question.. Stop being stupid.
I suspected you were leaning pretty hard in the MRA-extremist direction. Your repeated use of "femnazis" and expressions such as that make it fairly clear.
I've agreed with you in several discussions regarding gender-related topics, but I've several times complained about your terminology and way of referring to the opposition. I consider myself very close to neutral. I'm for equality (note: not equity) and I will call out any ******** I see regardless of which side it's on. If I see ******** on the feminist side I sure as hell will point that out, and if I see it on the "MRA" (or whatever you want to call yourselves) side I sure hell will point out that too.
Toshabi wrote:
I guess if the woman isn't the main household provider, earning the most income and wears the pants in the relationship, Caucheka is sexist.
You just presented a false dilemma. Please stop using fallacies.
xIchi wrote:
Idk, but caucheka answered perfectly to your question.
I mean, all the question he put out were mostly clarifying how his gf looks at family and her standpoint especially pointing out the parts where femenism/femenazis try to extremely change the structure.
Right now, you are just a big *** hypocrite, Searz.
I mean, all the question he put out were mostly clarifying how his gf looks at family and her standpoint especially pointing out the parts where femenism/femenazis try to extremely change the structure.
Right now, you are just a big *** hypocrite, Searz.
He didn't even post an answer. He posted a series of questions, which even if assumed rhetorical don't even answer the initial question.. Stop being stupid.
I suspected you were leaning pretty hard in the MRA-extremist direction. Your repeated use of "femnazis" and expressions such as that make it fairly clear.
I've agreed with you in several discussions regarding gender-related topics, but I've several times complained about your terminology and way of referring to the opposition. I consider myself very close to neutral. I'm for equality (note: not equity) and I will call out any ******** I see regardless of which side it's on. If I see ******** on the feminist side I sure as hell will point that out, and if I see it on the "MRA" (or whatever you want to call yourselves) side I sure hell will point out that too.
"You can't have your privacy violated if you don't know your privacy is violated." - Mike Rogers, U.S. Representative for Michigan's 8th congressional district, 2013
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
You need to log in before commenting.
And this thread isn't about Feminism (lol, wannabe problems) or woman's rights. This is about what you got from Christmas. So shut the **** up and get back on topic or I'm sitting on you.