plus the only way to make it more powerful is to run offensive masteries, which is only good if you're an ad carry pretty much.
i've recently run clairvoyance a lot on my aura ***** maokai build because i'm already building 21 utility. its a cheap effective spell for its slot.
i've recently run clairvoyance a lot on my aura ***** maokai build because i'm already building 21 utility. its a cheap effective spell for its slot.
I like things that make me feel stupid. - Ken Levine
caucheka wrote:
plus the only way to make it more powerful is to run offensive masteries, which is only good if you're an ad carry pretty much.
i've recently run clairvoyance a lot on my aura ***** maokai build because i'm already building 21 utility. its a cheap effective spell for its slot.
Yeah, especially since the offensive mastery gives it a ton of AP to boot. So then it's benefiting your whole team :D
The problem is, being a team-benefiting thing pushes it more towards the support category, and the mastery that makes it a decent support spell is in the offense tree.
Not to mention the fact that even AD carries run 21 into defense/utility more than they run 21 in offense, so it becomes even more useless.
agreed. Maybe it should be a consumable item in the future? :S
and lol caucheka, your claris helped so much xD
and lol caucheka, your claris helped so much xD
Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
So the biggest suggestion is to make the CD shorter?
Why not go further?
I'd say making it provide both AD and AP without the mastery is a good thing. The mastery should provide longer duration and/or make the flag more durable and/or reduce the CD or something like that.
Why not go further?
I'd say making it provide both AD and AP without the mastery is a good thing. The mastery should provide longer duration and/or make the flag more durable and/or reduce the CD or something like that.
"You can't have your privacy violated if you don't know your privacy is violated." - Mike Rogers, U.S. Representative for Michigan's 8th congressional district, 2013
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
You need to log in before commenting.
<Ancient Member>
Yes, I had a rough childhood." - devdevil