Evelynn: AD or AP?

[quote=Nighthawk]Her AD is amazing. Triforce is ossom. Proc is awesome...stats are ossom.[/quote]

[quote=Adonikam][quote=Scrax] AD: Extremely good tower-destroyer, [u]more[/u] survivability, lesser burst, more sustained dps. AP: Lesser good tower-destroyer, [u]lesser[/u] survivability, extremely good burst, less sustained dps, better suited as a roamer/ganker/assassin. But what do you need survivability for when you one-shot/one-burst your target? Just sayin'. [/quote] Not sure if serious. With AP you can build tanky AND damage at the SAME time! I like AD more though not sure what's stronger ofc.[/quote]

[quote=Nighthawk][quote=Adonikam] Not sure if serious. With AD you can build tanky AND damage at the SAME time! I like AD more though not sure what's stronger ofc. [/quote] fix'd[/quote]

[quote=TheJohn]Well, I've already seen both, but never played as Eve. But I have something to say: if AP gives you a hit-kill possibility and AD gives more chance to survive, get both.[/quote]

[quote=Nighthawk]if your saying go hybrid then...meh. It might work. I've never seen it used, but I suppose it might.[/quote]

[quote=TheJohn]If it works or not, I dunno. I think I'll have to buy Eve and try (or hack an account).[/quote]

[quote=Nighthawk]and...how would you hack an account again? o.O[/quote]

[quote=mobrebel]I personally find AP better. Here are some points that I can think of. All of her ratios are AP. Survivability won't matter if you take out carry before anything can happen. Ult is Attack Speed. Using Ult, AP can crush towers faster than AD. AD doesn't rely on CD. AD is sustained damage. AP can have sustained damage through Q spam and Lich Bane. Now, for all you math freaks: Let's take a AP Eve with 600 AP and Lich Bane(No CD and 1.4 atk spd) with a AD Eve with 350 AD and Trinity Force(No CD and 2.5 Atk Spd). For the sake of the ideas, I will calculate for DPS in 1 seconds(burst) and 5 seconds(sustained). Also, I will not assume there are any resistances for ease of calculation... XD. We will start with AD: Burst: AD: 350 Atk Spd: 2.5 attacks per 1 sec Hate Spike: 85 per hit for 3 hits(.8 second CD) = 255 Auto Attacks: 350 per hit for 5 hits = 1750 Ravage: 320 per hit for 1 hit = 320 Trin Force: 1 proc with 107.4 base = 161.1 Total Damage in 2 Seconds: 2486.1 Sustained: AD: 350 Atk Spd: 2.5 Hate Spike: 85 * 7 = 595 AA: 350 * 12.5 = 4375 Ravage: 320 Trin Force: 3 procs * 161.1 = 483.3 Total Damage in 5 Seconds: 5773.3 AP: Burst: AD: 107.4 AP: 600 Atk Spd: 1.5 Hate Spike: (85+(.28*600))*3 = 759 AA: 107.4 * 3 = 322.2 Ravage: 920 Lich Bane: 600 Total: 3521.2 Sustained: AD: 107.4 AP: 600 Atk Spd: 1.5 Hate Spike: (85+(.28*600))*7 = 1771 AA: 107.4 * 7.5 = 805.5 Ravage: 920 Lich Bane: 600 * 3 procs = 1800 Total: 5296.5 From what I am seeing here, AP does way better with burst and only slightly worse than AD in sustained damage(if it is 5 seconds). Seeing as team fights usually only last 1 or 2 seconds until it becomes "pick up the scraps" time, AP is, IMO, better.[/quote]

[quote=Jebus McAzn]The problem with that is that AD utilizes burst from Triforce far better than AP uses Lich Bane bursts. AP can't afford to stay in, otherwise she dies in a matter of seconds. AD can continually stay in and get that Triforce proc every 2 seconds. If you try to build tanky on AP, you don't have enough damage. :/[/quote]

[quote=Nighthawk]You kind of forgot to put in the DFG active for the AP build, i'm assuming.[/quote]