This thread is locked
PLEASE NOTE: This thread has been locked by the moderators. You cannot reply to it.
"I saw [Twilight: Eclipse] in theaters with a girl I was dating at the time. I spent more time staring at my toes and wiggling them than I did watching this abomination. When Edward proposed to Blank Face, I finally looked up with a revelation.
I blurted out loud, in a dead silent theater full of teenage girls on opening night "Wait a minute, Edward has no blood flow. How does he get an erection?" I heard several men laughing, and had several girls turn and stare at me.
I did not get laid that night." - Berengier817
I blurted out loud, in a dead silent theater full of teenage girls on opening night "Wait a minute, Edward has no blood flow. How does he get an erection?" I heard several men laughing, and had several girls turn and stare at me.
I did not get laid that night." - Berengier817
Nope. The HP5 on Stark is pretty bad and is what takes up a pretty big part of the price.
It might be viable to rush Emblem of Valour for the lane sustain, but otherwise Stark is just a bad choice.
It might be viable to rush Emblem of Valour for the lane sustain, but otherwise Stark is just a bad choice.
"I love the dirty bomb tag because i get either
a) posts about the game
b) current world affairs" - steel-sentry
a) posts about the game
b) current world affairs" - steel-sentry
I think they should buff bloodthirster so that it gives the amount from 20 stacks while buying it and giving the chance to stack 20 instead of the current 40.
So it's basically like starting with 20 stacks when you buy it.
Of course the price will need to be increased, and I think they should make another item build into it, instead of only a BF and a Vamp. Maybe a pickaxe or replace vamp with emblem?
So it's basically like starting with 20 stacks when you buy it.
Of course the price will need to be increased, and I think they should make another item build into it, instead of only a BF and a Vamp. Maybe a pickaxe or replace vamp with emblem?
Searz, what is the sweet spot for attack speed? You say that BT is better than a Starks, but surely if you have 5 pure AD items, and you're attacking .7 times per second, it would be much better to buy a starks than BT.
There has to be some optimal Attack Speed / AD ratio which will maximize your damage output over 5 seconds. (AD should get some bonus points because it usually helps with skills as well whereas attack speed doesn't)
There has to be some optimal Attack Speed / AD ratio which will maximize your damage output over 5 seconds. (AD should get some bonus points because it usually helps with skills as well whereas attack speed doesn't)
I don't know, but I feel like having more than 1.8 won't help unless they're CCd or standing still.
"If someone is ****, you point at them and declare "****!". Because this is the internet." - Serpentiferous
"The Internet: where men are men, women are men, and little girls are the FBI." - ???
"The Internet: where men are men, women are men, and little girls are the FBI." - ???
Oooold thread. I won't be re-uploading them images.
BT is a pretty good item now, but I'm hating the stacking part. But there's nothing we can do about that :/
BT is a pretty good item now, but I'm hating the stacking part. But there's nothing we can do about that :/
Google has a job title called "Head of Black Community Engagement"..
I don't know whether to cry or laugh.. or both.
I don't know whether to cry or laugh.. or both.
The resetting bonuses is still a dumb mechanic, but it's viable anyways.