This thread is locked
PLEASE NOTE: This thread has been locked by the moderators. You cannot reply to it.
Nope. The HP5 on Stark is pretty bad and is what takes up a pretty big part of the price.
It might be viable to rush Emblem of Valour for the lane sustain, but otherwise Stark is just a bad choice.
It might be viable to rush Emblem of Valour for the lane sustain, but otherwise Stark is just a bad choice.
"Moral justification is a powerful disengagement mechanism. Destructive conduct is made personally and socially acceptable by portraying it in the service of moral ends." - Albert Bandura
"Ultimately, if people lose their willingness to recognize that there are times in our history when legality becomes distinct from morality, we aren't just ceding control of our rights to government, but our futures." - Edward Snowden
"Ultimately, if people lose their willingness to recognize that there are times in our history when legality becomes distinct from morality, we aren't just ceding control of our rights to government, but our futures." - Edward Snowden
I think they should buff bloodthirster so that it gives the amount from 20 stacks while buying it and giving the chance to stack 20 instead of the current 40.
So it's basically like starting with 20 stacks when you buy it.
Of course the price will need to be increased, and I think they should make another item build into it, instead of only a BF and a Vamp. Maybe a pickaxe or replace vamp with emblem?
So it's basically like starting with 20 stacks when you buy it.
Of course the price will need to be increased, and I think they should make another item build into it, instead of only a BF and a Vamp. Maybe a pickaxe or replace vamp with emblem?
No, they should remove the entire stacking part and nerf the total stats a little.
"We've had a few gloomy years with bad console ports, and what do we get in the light at the end of the console-tunnel? A tablet OS ported to PC." - Atlas Tasume, on Windows 8
Searz, what is the sweet spot for attack speed? You say that BT is better than a Starks, but surely if you have 5 pure AD items, and you're attacking .7 times per second, it would be much better to buy a starks than BT.
There has to be some optimal Attack Speed / AD ratio which will maximize your damage output over 5 seconds. (AD should get some bonus points because it usually helps with skills as well whereas attack speed doesn't)
There has to be some optimal Attack Speed / AD ratio which will maximize your damage output over 5 seconds. (AD should get some bonus points because it usually helps with skills as well whereas attack speed doesn't)
Oooold thread. I won't be re-uploading them images.
BT is a pretty good item now, but I'm hating the stacking part. But there's nothing we can do about that :/
BT is a pretty good item now, but I'm hating the stacking part. But there's nothing we can do about that :/
"You can't have your privacy violated if you don't know your privacy is violated." - Mike Rogers, U.S. Representative for Michigan's 8th congressional district, 2013
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
The resetting bonuses is still a dumb mechanic, but it's viable anyways.