This thread is locked
PLEASE NOTE: This thread has been locked by the moderators. You cannot reply to it.
"You can't have your privacy violated if you don't know your privacy is violated." - Mike Rogers, U.S. Representative for Michigan's 8th congressional district, 2013
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
I.e: Mike Rogers doesn't think it's rape unless the victim knows (s)he has been raped. Sounds legit.
Temzilla wrote:
What?
Okay, so, you have 225 armor right?
So, your 300 AD does 300*(100/325)= 92.3076923 Damage.
Now, if the tower has 215 armor...
Your 300 AD does 300*(100/315)= 95.2380952 Damage.
If we do 95.2380952/92.3076923, we get 1.03174603, a three PERCENT increase.
I was wrong when i said "it's the same as the +10 damage to turrets mastery" but i wasn't wrong with what i said about it being 3 damage per 100 ad. I wasn't really thinking, nasty flu and all.
It's worth 3 AD at 100 AD.
Yes, it's a 3% increase of damage to towers, BUT I didn't disagree with that part.
You're still connecting it to the wrong variable. You get 3 damage per 100DAMAGE, not per 100AD. You get 1 DAMAGE per 100AD.
:P
"Games may not be art, but this one did wonderful things to my ****." - Roger Ebert
"I AM PRETTY SURE THIS MANGA IS VIOLATING SOME LAWS ABOUT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
I CANNOT GET ENOUGH
****" - mencretnas, on Gigantomakhia
"I AM PRETTY SURE THIS MANGA IS VIOLATING SOME LAWS ABOUT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
I CANNOT GET ENOUGH
****" - mencretnas, on Gigantomakhia
And now Riot decides to **** up more masteries. YAY!
(Alacrity)
http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/V1.0.0.131
(Alacrity)
http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/V1.0.0.131
"Doing something, almost being done, then parents come in and don't let you finish.
Yes, I had a rough childhood." - devdevil
Yes, I had a rough childhood." - devdevil
You were tired and in a bad mood, hope you feel better, but that does not excuse hypocritical accusations of ignorance, and then an over reaction of anger when the person you literally just called ignorant says it right back.
My response is always the same, and you never want to hear it or acknowledge it. Probably because you think it's wrong.
Even if something is not optimal in regards to cost to effect, it can still be strong and useful if you understand when and why to use it.
This is the case for Honor guard. It's not as "Cost effective" as other options, but much like armor red runes and armor blue runes, which are outclassed in terms of cost to effect by other options, they are still a viable option and sometimes they are the best option.
Honor guard can even be a better pick than the move speed above 70% and 8% CDR at 18, even though it is severely outclassed in terms of efficiency of mastery.
I'm always right whenever I argue with you Searz, I don't tend to argue unless I'm comfortable with the claims I'm making.
I also wouldn't be surprised if they do buff and nerf a lot of mastery choices, but even in an underpowered state they can still be a reasonable selection due to the nature of the new tree.
My response is always the same, and you never want to hear it or acknowledge it. Probably because you think it's wrong.
Even if something is not optimal in regards to cost to effect, it can still be strong and useful if you understand when and why to use it.
This is the case for Honor guard. It's not as "Cost effective" as other options, but much like armor red runes and armor blue runes, which are outclassed in terms of cost to effect by other options, they are still a viable option and sometimes they are the best option.
Honor guard can even be a better pick than the move speed above 70% and 8% CDR at 18, even though it is severely outclassed in terms of efficiency of mastery.
I'm always right whenever I argue with you Searz, I don't tend to argue unless I'm comfortable with the claims I'm making.
I also wouldn't be surprised if they do buff and nerf a lot of mastery choices, but even in an underpowered state they can still be a reasonable selection due to the nature of the new tree.
http://www.mobafire.com/league-of-legends/build/duffs-336706
Come hang out when I'm streaming! http://www.twitch.tv/dufftime
Searz wrote:
Yes, it's a 3% increase of damage to towers, BUT I didn't disagree with that part.
You're still connecting it to the wrong variable. You get 3 damage per 100DAMAGE, not per 100AD. You get 1 DAMAGE per 100AD.
:P
Yeah, crazy symantic errors everywhere.
I was mainly offended by the "lemme correct your math" when the math was fine, it was the words that came after it :s.
Tri lane for life.
Searz wrote:
I'm just quoting this part because it's awesome.
I'll leave it at that.
It is pretty awesome.
http://www.mobafire.com/league-of-legends/build/duffs-336706
Come hang out when I'm streaming! http://www.twitch.tv/dufftime
Temzilla wrote:
Yeah, crazy symantic errors everywhere.
I was mainly offended by the "lemme correct your math" when the math was fine, it was the words that came after it :s.
Well, when you label something wrong the math becomes wrong too, because it's not correct for the thing you're labeling it as :P
You call me ignorant, and when I say the exact same words back you can't handle it. The exact, same, words.
I was tired and not in a good mood. Especially not in the mood for discussion with someone who's always "right".
Now GTFO or respond to MY RESPONSE, which you conveniently ignored.