:) Well, as you can see, question one is pretty much done, and question three is... sorta done, lol, have you made progress on question 2?
Maybe we can meet up and study ^^
Do you play LoL too?
Maybe we can meet up and study ^^
Do you play LoL too?
♡ guide writing tips 'n tricks ♡ ashes to ashes ♡ fancy a sig? ♡

♡ sig unintentional collab with Jovy and me ♡

♡ sig unintentional collab with Jovy and me ♡
yeah, catch up could be good. i live in the city. nah, dont play, just found this forum today.
check out this on the "gamma function" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function
i could be wrong about laplace transforms.
check out this on the "gamma function" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function
i could be wrong about laplace transforms.
I've had more help with question 3, how about I upload the answers here, and you upload your answer for question 2?
Together we can simplify the answers into a memorable format ^^
I = Integrate
I t^(x-1)e^(-t)
Integrate By Parts
I U(dV/dx)dx = UV - I V(dU/dx)dx
U = t^(x-1)
V = e^(-t)
= [-t^(x-1)e^(-t)]inf>0 + I e^(-t)t(x-1)t^(x-2)
= [-0^(x-1)e^(-inf)] + I e^(-t)t(x-1)t^(x-2)
= (0-0) + I e^(-t)t(x-1)t^(x-2)
= (x-1) I t^(x-2)e^(-t)
= (x-1) gamma (x-1)
So how do we do part b?
Together we can simplify the answers into a memorable format ^^
I = Integrate
I t^(x-1)e^(-t)
Integrate By Parts
I U(dV/dx)dx = UV - I V(dU/dx)dx
U = t^(x-1)
V = e^(-t)
= [-t^(x-1)e^(-t)]inf>0 + I e^(-t)t(x-1)t^(x-2)
= [-0^(x-1)e^(-inf)] + I e^(-t)t(x-1)t^(x-2)
= (0-0) + I e^(-t)t(x-1)t^(x-2)
= (x-1) I t^(x-2)e^(-t)
= (x-1) gamma (x-1)

So how do we do part b?
I'm in high school AP Calculus at the moment but it's always been my strongest subject.
2 seems like doof's process would work - integrate by parts then prove the identity using induction or simple algebraic manipulation.
Unless I'm missing something, b is simple once you've derived A. Since GAMMA(X)=(X-1)(GAMMA (X-1)), you can expand this indefinitely to get GAMMA(X)=(X-1)! which thus establishes the relationship between the two functions for integer values of X.
The question probably wants you to solve it for all values of X, though, meaning that a more thorough definition of "factorial" is necessary as opposed to X(X-1)(X-2)(X-3)...(3)(2)(1) for integer X. In that case, I'm lost, since I haven't done that much higher-level math.
2 seems like doof's process would work - integrate by parts then prove the identity using induction or simple algebraic manipulation.
Unless I'm missing something, b is simple once you've derived A. Since GAMMA(X)=(X-1)(GAMMA (X-1)), you can expand this indefinitely to get GAMMA(X)=(X-1)! which thus establishes the relationship between the two functions for integer values of X.
The question probably wants you to solve it for all values of X, though, meaning that a more thorough definition of "factorial" is necessary as opposed to X(X-1)(X-2)(X-3)...(3)(2)(1) for integer X. In that case, I'm lost, since I haven't done that much higher-level math.





You need to log in before commenting.
<Member>
http://www.mobafire.com/league-of-legends/build/in-depth-item-guide-97205
and check out my blog:: http://yargarbl.blogspot.com