sirell wrote:
So I suppose you've tried arguing with every single one? I find apologists like Ravi Zachariah to be quite reasonable.
I looked him up. From his wikipedia page:
"Zacharias also believes that in Christianity homosexual acts are an “aberration” and “violation” of human sexuality and that though some people may have a homosexual “disposition,” they are not justified in expressing that disposition."
This is not what I call reasonable, this is what I call discrimination.
So, I dreamcrushed my way to silver.
And of course, there will always be people who will find that one flaw and blow it out of proportion.
I said 'quite' reasonable.
And did you look up the reasoning behind what he said?
I said 'quite' reasonable.
And did you look up the reasoning behind what he said?
UnhallowedGeralf wrote:
I looked him up. From his wikipedia page:
"Zacharias also believes that in Christianity homosexual acts are an “aberration” and “violation” of human sexuality and that though some people may have a homosexual “disposition,” they are not justified in expressing that disposition."
This is not what I call reasonable, this is what I call discrimination.
I looked you up on Wikipedia. Says you're a werewolf who masquerades as a human who likes to pretend he's a robot, and that you hate all Zebra's and run your own club with others who also hate Zebra's.
You need to log in before commenting.
^do you really blame him?
well he is into bestiality...