Satella wrote:
Be honest, how many of the last 50 games you won had a non-meta lane layout?
Either jungler is the last pick left, for which I then complete the meta cause
Xin Zhao = OPOr support is left. Then I go
Teemo support. Breaking the meta. Cause I'm not support. I'm a lil death machine hellbent on killing stuff.Last 15 games:
Xin Zhao & Sona = Meta Teemo = bot APC death machine Jinx = 1 game double ADC, 1 game top pew pew Kha'Zix killerNon-meta setups can be very effective. But it depends on the players.
Z3r0Fear wrote:
I hope this is the end of teemo appearing in games because it will be very nice to not see him anymore.
Tbh, I think the problem here is that people don't see him. It's so funny popping out of stealth and dropping someone 100% to 50% before they can react. It's even better when they do it repeatedly.
RaNuD
<Member>
<Member>
Back when I was playing a lot of Magic: The Gathering tournaments, there was someting we called "rogue strategies" (ie: roaming bruiser Taric). None of these were "meta-breaking", ever. For sure they would sometimes get away with it, and you would see a rogue deck reaching top 8 every once in a while...
I feel quite a few people should revise their definition of "meta" and "meta-break" since rogue strategies (roamingbruisertaric) are actually crafted EXACTLY arround what you expect from a given meta, and capitalize on surprise. Since people will ajust really quick (the meta got in place for a reason), you wont be able to pull them moves for a long time, hence there is no meta breaking here.
On-Topic, really: I enjoy this idea overall, I believe all the game content sort of pushes the current meta anyway (mostly due to how hard ADC scale, IMO). This would just make things much easier in general.
I feel quite a few people should revise their definition of "meta" and "meta-break" since rogue strategies (roamingbruisertaric) are actually crafted EXACTLY arround what you expect from a given meta, and capitalize on surprise. Since people will ajust really quick (the meta got in place for a reason), you wont be able to pull them moves for a long time, hence there is no meta breaking here.
On-Topic, really: I enjoy this idea overall, I believe all the game content sort of pushes the current meta anyway (mostly due to how hard ADC scale, IMO). This would just make things much easier in general.
In a thread about his own ban,
In a thread about toxic players,
gabpin wrote:
stfu I only did that : swearing and thats why i got ban are u ****** or something ?
In a thread about toxic players,
throatslasher wrote:
Go be a whiny baby elsewhere. Find and abuse the ignore button. No sense stinking up this forum with your crying.
DillButt64 wrote:
twice in a single thread people have said krama jangl is uncommon/not viable ):
It's still uncommon and not viable. Just because somebody won once does not make it a consistent strong pick. Now that the element of surprise is lost teams will know how to contend with her.
SkidmarkD wrote:
Tbh, I think the problem here is that people don't see him. It's so funny popping out of stealth and dropping someone 100% to 50% before they can react. It's even better when they do it repeatedly.
Vision Ward. If they're not using it, they're not any good.
luizdeh
<Member>
<Member>
You need to log in before commenting.
If by meta, you actually mean uncommon picks, there's nothing stopping you from playing karma jungle in this system.
twice in a single thread people have said krama jangl is uncommon/not viable ):
i dont really see how this can work for draft mode unless its just sort of an extended queue time where you find a premade team and decide things there before you go to picks and bans, where youll just have to trust that the people you decided to go into the game with are going to pick a viable champion instead of darius after telling everyone "its ok ill go support"