Mobafire League of Legends Build Guides Mobafire League of Legends Build Guides
's Forum Avatar

Ancient necros

Creator: Lugignaf December 21, 2011 4:46pm
17 posts - page 1 of 2
1 2
Lugignaf
<Moderator>
Lugignaf's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
10967
Joined:
Feb 8th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep | Commend December 21, 2011 4:46pm | Report
I've been seeing quite a few old threads pop up lately and people have just been replying to them like they're new.

Can we have something like, a force lock if a thread is over a year old with no replies if it's not stickied?
jhoijhoi
<MOBAFire Mother>
jhoijhoi's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
14059
Joined:
Mar 20th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep | Commend December 21, 2011 5:02pm | Report
^I think that's a good idea.
PsiGuard
<Community Manager>
PsiGuard's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
8179
Joined:
Jun 26th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep | Commend December 21, 2011 8:14pm | Report
I liked Nameless' suggestion better.

There are cases where it's better for a thread to remain open, even if it's old. Sometimes people will bump a thread when the discussion becomes relevant again.

I think a warning to new users is a more appropriate response to the problem than auto-locking all the old threads. I realize that reopening old threads isn't always a good thing, but I think removing the option has the potential to cause more problems.

EDIT: Also, there are plenty of threads that get necroed before they are a year old. Nameless' suggestion allows for a warning system to be used MUCH earlier than that (I think a couple months would be fine), whereas an auto-lock system can't happen too soon or it might end up closing discussions that are still relevant.
Thanks to Fatelblade for the sig!
Lugignaf
<Moderator>
Lugignaf's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
10967
Joined:
Feb 8th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep | Commend December 21, 2011 8:19pm | Report
But still, at a year of no posts, I think it should be auto-locked.
True love is found only in yourself.
Matt
<Administrator>
Matt's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
4272
Joined:
Dec 8th, 2009
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep | Commend December 21, 2011 8:31pm | Report
That suggestion for a warning before posting is a good idea. If they get a warning and still proceed, and it was in poor taste, then we are justified from there to step in and smack them.
The_Nameless_Bard
<Ancient Member>
The_Nameless_Bard's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
12924
Joined:
Jan 17th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep | Commend December 21, 2011 9:54pm | Report
well...I think a warning at first with an eventual autolock on threads more than a year old makes sense.

But that's just me.
Matt
<Administrator>
Matt's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
4272
Joined:
Dec 8th, 2009
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep | Commend December 21, 2011 10:49pm | Report
Wouldn't you rather bait people into self-destruction for our entertainment though?
The_Nameless_Bard
<Ancient Member>
The_Nameless_Bard's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
12924
Joined:
Jan 17th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep | Commend December 21, 2011 10:50pm | Report
when you put it that way..................
Matt
<Administrator>
Matt's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
4272
Joined:
Dec 8th, 2009
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep | Commend December 21, 2011 10:56pm | Report
Lol... It does make sense, a year is a long time, just that there are some sticky/FAQ type threads that are very old but shouldn't necessarily be locked.
Bryun
<Magic Man>
Bryun's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
2350
Joined:
May 1st, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep | Commend December 21, 2011 11:04pm | Report
Matt wrote:

Wouldn't you rather bait people into self-destruction for our entertainment though?


Matt, I love that you're Mobafire's administrator. <3<3

1 2

You need to log in before commenting.