Click to open network menu
Join or Log In
Mobafire logo

Join the leading League of Legends community. Create and share Champion Guides and Builds.

Create an MFN Account






Or

MOBAFire's first Mini Guide Contest of Season 14 is here! Create or update guides for the 30 featured champions and compete for up to $200 in prizes! 🏆
's Forum Avatar

Regarding Comment 2 Vote

Creator: JunSupport April 6, 2011 8:51pm

This thread is locked

PLEASE NOTE: This thread has been locked by the moderators. You cannot reply to it.

132 posts - page 1 of 14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 14
JunSupport
<Veteran>
JunSupport's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
3344
Joined:
Oct 5th, 2010
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep April 6, 2011 8:51pm | Report
What if the C2V requirement was only a temporary application?

Like, after 60 votes, C2V could no longer apply.

My reasoning behind this is that:
1. C2V is made to protect authors from troll votes
2. After a while, ratings get inflated, especially if they hit the monthly top 10 list. So the "protection" backfires.
3. The issue with starting without C2V altogether is that ratings drop too heavily based on 1~2 votes, which really hurts the confidence of the author.

If it were only temporary, it could give guides protection from troll votes early on until it had a stable enough rating to be properly rated when votes are anonymous.
This would be similar to a parent-child scenario; we only give the guides protection early on, but it has to be able to handle things on its own once it's had enough time (votes).

Note:

Sucess! This idea was implemented. ^__^
~ Gentlemen Cho'Gath ~
┌──┐
┴──┴
< ಠ,....,ರೃ>
~ Keeping this sig classy ~

Guides of Mine - Click the... Eh... Come back later

~Undergoing barbaric-Destruction, tasteful-Renovation, and blasphemous-Reconstruction soonâ„¢~
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ ┬──┬ ノ( ゜-゜ノ)
Searz
<Ancient Member>
Searz's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
13418
Joined:
Jun 6th, 2010
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep April 7, 2011 1:21am | Report
I like this idea. I've thought about it before.
The "protection" should last for 60-100votes.
"Doing something, almost being done, then parents come in and don't let you finish.
Yes, I had a rough childhood." - devdevil
Matt
<Administrator>
Matt's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
4286
Joined:
Dec 8th, 2009
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep April 7, 2011 1:21am | Report
Seems like a pretty good idea to me. What does everyone else think?
Lugignaf
<Veteran>
Lugignaf's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
10968
Joined:
Feb 8th, 2011
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep April 7, 2011 1:23am | Report
I don't care either way. I still think it's a pretty good idea though.
Adonikam
<Veteran>
Adonikam's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
3045
Joined:
Oct 16th, 2010
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep April 7, 2011 1:32am | Report
The protection should last 20-30 IMO. but otherwise good idea =)
Australians, the best gamers in the world combined with the worst ping.
DEWO
<Retired Moderator>
DEWO's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
5526
Joined:
Feb 15th, 2010
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep April 7, 2011 1:55am | Report
But but... I suggested this some time ago... noone listens to me :SadPanda: :(
Did i help you? Click that +Rep

Thanks to jhoijhoi for the sig!
Matt
<Administrator>
Matt's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
4286
Joined:
Dec 8th, 2009
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep April 7, 2011 2:15am | Report
You just didn't hit the keys hard enough when you said it last time ;)

A lower number would be nice, help decrease the potential impact. 20 might be a good start.
DEWO
<Retired Moderator>
DEWO's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
5526
Joined:
Feb 15th, 2010
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep April 7, 2011 3:11am | Report
Well cant find that post but my suggestion was to make all guides (not builds) in a c2v for 1st 20-30 votes. Than remove it.

In my eyes 20-30 votes are enaugh to establish some nice base for what kind of guide it is.
Did i help you? Click that +Rep

Thanks to jhoijhoi for the sig!
Matt
<Administrator>
Matt's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
4286
Joined:
Dec 8th, 2009
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep April 7, 2011 3:37am | Report
If anyone has any objections to this feature speak now or forever hold your peace.

Going once...

Going twice...
Trojan995
<Veteran>
Trojan995's Forum Avatar
Show more awards
Posts:
2510
Joined:
Oct 4th, 2010
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep April 7, 2011 5:12am | Report
This is best, definitely.

Especially since most of the reason people take c2v (at least the ones that don't care about rating) is to get as much feedback as possible. After a certain amount of time, NO feedback comes in, other than what would come in anyways - most of the votes are "I did well with this guide +1". Not only would it stop a flurry of votes such as that (making it harder for the guide creator to sift through), it also makes it so that the score isn't artificially inflated.

The c2v should be taken off at a LOW level, because if you look in the top 10, there's a lot of builds that get there with only 20 or so votes. I think 30 is the best mark, personally.
Click for one of my awesome builds!
Thanks to Mowen, WrATHofVuLK, and AlexanPT for the signatures! Check out Tristana: The Lane Game, Maokai: The Chu8 Way, and Twisted Fate: Card Games!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 14

League of Legends Champions:

Teamfight Tactics Guide