GMD the reason Zed is being brought up is because leblanc is commonly thought of to be the AP version of zed. With
Deathfire Grasp being removed, people are complaning about
Zed in the scope that
LeBlanc will no longer have the equivalent burst damage that zed can pack, provided that because of
LeBlanc's inherent squishiness, she will be forced to
Distortion towards a target.
Riot will have effectively taken leblanc out of the game. If you are looking for a champion with Burst, there will be no reason to pick leblanc over zed, as
LeBlanc needed the extra damage from
Deathfire Grasp to stay equal with the burst damage that zed can put out through
Death Mark. If you are looking for a champion with catch potential,
Ahri will excel just as well - if not better than leblanc due to the fact that
Charm has a longer range, faster projectile speed, a wider hit box, and instantly CCs her opponent whereas leblanc's
Ethereal Chains are significantly more difficult to hit in comparison.





Riot will have effectively taken leblanc out of the game. If you are looking for a champion with Burst, there will be no reason to pick leblanc over zed, as






If I helped you out, be sure to throw me a +Rep!
-
My Soraka Guide | My Review Service

Thanks a lot for the sig, jhoi! :)
-
My Soraka Guide | My Review Service

Thanks a lot for the sig, jhoi! :)
utopus wrote:
GMD the reason Zed is being brought up is because leblanc is commonly thought of to be the AP version of zed. With
Deathfire Grasp being removed, people are complaning about
Zed in the scope that
LeBlanc will no longer have the equivalent burst damage that zed can pack, provided that because of
LeBlanc's inherent squishiness, she will be forced to
Distortion towards a target.





If you'd ask me,


I do understand people's frustration, and I will not argue that

utopus wrote:
Riot will have effectively taken leblanc out of the game. If you are looking for a champion with Burst, there will be no reason to pick leblanc over zed, as
LeBlanc needed the extra damage from
Deathfire Grasp to stay equal with the burst damage that zed can put out through
Death Mark. If you are looking for a champion with catch potential,
Ahri will excel just as well - if not better than leblanc due to the fact that
Charm has a longer range, faster projectile speed, a wider hit box, and instantly CCs her opponent whereas leblanc's
Ethereal Chains are significantly more difficult to hit in comparison.






There's still a reason to pick LB over









utopus wrote:
GMD the reason Zed is being brought up is because leblanc is commonly thought of to be the AP version of zed. With
Deathfire Grasp being removed, people are complaning about
Zed in the scope that
LeBlanc will no longer have the equivalent burst damage that zed can pack, provided that because of
LeBlanc's inherent squishiness, she will be forced to
Distortion towards a target.
Riot will have effectively taken leblanc out of the game. If you are looking for a champion with Burst, there will be no reason to pick leblanc over zed, as
LeBlanc needed the extra damage from
Deathfire Grasp to stay equal with the burst damage that zed can put out through
Death Mark. If you are looking for a champion with catch potential,
Ahri will excel just as well - if not better than leblanc due to the fact that
Charm has a longer range, faster projectile speed, a wider hit box, and instantly CCs her opponent whereas leblanc's
Ethereal Chains are significantly more difficult to hit in comparison.





Riot will have effectively taken leblanc out of the game. If you are looking for a champion with Burst, there will be no reason to pick leblanc over zed, as






But the most common LeBlanc build doesn't even use DFG lol, it's barely a nerf to her. She's still the "AP Zed".
LeBlanc shouldn't have as much burst as Zed because, however good his escapes may be, he's melee. He needs to get right up in someone's face to burst them, and he needs to stay longer than LeBlanc does to do it. LeBlanc can W forwards, burst someone's face off in half a second then W back to safety. Why should that combo (which has like a 20 second cooldown with 25% CDR) have just as much damage as Zed's riskier, longer cooldown burst?
Vapora Dark wrote:
But the most common LeBlanc build doesn't even use DFG lol, it's barely a nerf to her. She's still the "AP Zed".
LeBlanc shouldn't have as much burst as Zed because, however good his escapes may be, he's melee. He needs to get right up in someone's face to burst them, and he needs to stay longer than LeBlanc does to do it. LeBlanc can W forwards, burst someone's face off in half a second then W back to safety. Why should that combo (which has like a 20 second cooldown with 25% CDR) have just as much damage as Zed's riskier, longer cooldown burst?
Also,



You need to log in before commenting.
How so? Exactly the same thing is required of both champs after you used the DFG active/Zed ult: sticking power and followup. You may argue that DFG is bonkers because it doesn't limit itself to the champion using it. Zhonya's hourglass prevents mage damage just as much as Zed's death mark trigger (which lategame he often doesn't even need) and of the DFG users. Is Zed being melee the issue? He has 3 shadows he can move out with, whereas
Whether or not
Regarding the counterplay of this particular example:
Leblanc packs next to 0 utility, lol. Also, the mages are much more susceptible to direct engages, and they aren't nearly as mobile as Zed/Talon/Rengar/Kha nor are they as effective at splitpushing. Not to mention those four, if splitpushing, demand at least two people to stop them or pressure the enemy team to do a really good engage mid (coz 5v4), otherwise they'll take objectives for free. So they're also skipping utility for map pressure. And, apart from Syndra/Veigar/Leblanc, the burst is hardly comparable, not to mention that, once again, you're sending a champion with less bulk stats and, in most cases, less mobility, into a bad position.
Spare me the word distortion, I spoke of giving burst mages another tool to help make sure they can get their job done which is, well, bursting. And Zed doesn't have those tools because he's been balanced around what already exists. This brings us to the "Riot will rebalance these champs" point which, as I've said before, I can't trust until I've seen it, since I doubt they'll give champions like Lissandra more damage. This, in turn, means that people used to a certain playstyle with that champ - a more aggressive one - are obligated to choose something else, even when their build wasn't necessarily the most popular.
Burst mages have plenty of tools to get their job done, and that's, like the champions you've mentioned, all buried within their kits. The problem is that DFG is just more of the same **** and changes the impact certain champions have on the game.
And in all fairness, I never brought up the “Riot will compensate” argument because I don't think it is an argument. I think removing DFG as it is right now is a good choice and should be healthy for the game. I don't mind the champions affected getting compensation in some shape or form, but whether that happens or not, that doesn't change the fact that DFG is unhealthy in the sense that it doesn't promote player interaction.
Oh, now we're resorting to direct offence, that's nice. I will not apologize for my "weird as **** Syndra build" it had a context and noone gave me better alternatives when I asked.
Your previous post suggests that you're just mad about its removal because you happen to be a
If you want to argue, then yes, you do need to justify it. I've provided a fair amount of reasons why DFG is an unhealthy aspect of this game and why it just no longer has a place in it. DFG does not promote player interaction, which is rather weird considering we are playing a game. The fact that, right now, it doesn't hold a significant spot in the competitive scene doesn't mean that the item has no impact overall.
There's nothing healthy about champions who can just 100-0 enemies simply by using DFG and their other spells, whether that ends up breaking the game or not.
I know the logic behind using the item on
The biggest difference between the 100-0 mages such as
I have not, will not, and shall not ever use that as an argument, because, frankly, it is not and will not ever be a valid argument. If you're trying to say that I'm an arrogant jerk, then sure, go ahead, but I've yet to hear an argument of why
P.S. If I actually had that attitude, I probably would not bother responding to each and everyone in detail regarding the subject, now would I?