GMD the reason Zed is being brought up is because leblanc is commonly thought of to be the AP version of zed. With Deathfire Grasp being removed, people are complaning about Zed in the scope that LeBlanc will no longer have the equivalent burst damage that zed can pack, provided that because of LeBlanc's inherent squishiness, she will be forced to Distortion towards a target.
Riot will have effectively taken leblanc out of the game. If you are looking for a champion with Burst, there will be no reason to pick leblanc over zed, as LeBlanc needed the extra damage from Deathfire Grasp to stay equal with the burst damage that zed can put out through Death Mark. If you are looking for a champion with catch potential, Ahri will excel just as well - if not better than leblanc due to the fact that Charm has a longer range, faster projectile speed, a wider hit box, and instantly CCs her opponent whereas leblanc's Ethereal Chains are significantly more difficult to hit in comparison.
Riot will have effectively taken leblanc out of the game. If you are looking for a champion with Burst, there will be no reason to pick leblanc over zed, as LeBlanc needed the extra damage from Deathfire Grasp to stay equal with the burst damage that zed can put out through Death Mark. If you are looking for a champion with catch potential, Ahri will excel just as well - if not better than leblanc due to the fact that Charm has a longer range, faster projectile speed, a wider hit box, and instantly CCs her opponent whereas leblanc's Ethereal Chains are significantly more difficult to hit in comparison.
If I helped you out, be sure to throw me a +Rep!
-
My Soraka Guide | My Review Service
Thanks a lot for the sig, jhoi! :)
-
My Soraka Guide | My Review Service
Thanks a lot for the sig, jhoi! :)
utopus wrote:
GMD the reason Zed is being brought up is because leblanc is commonly thought of to be the AP version of zed. With Deathfire Grasp being removed, people are complaning about Zed in the scope that LeBlanc will no longer have the equivalent burst damage that zed can pack, provided that because of LeBlanc's inherent squishiness, she will be forced to Distortion towards a target.
If you'd ask me, LeBlanc hasn't really been all that great since the silence removal, and I've never been fond of the DFG-rush build. The removal of DFG has very little to do with LB's viability as a whole; it's like the Lee Sin E-nerf; mostly a late-game nerf, but you don't pick the champ for late-game anyway.
I do understand people's frustration, and I will not argue that Zed's design is completely flawless, but it's hardly related to whether DFG is healthy for the game or not.
utopus wrote:
Riot will have effectively taken leblanc out of the game. If you are looking for a champion with Burst, there will be no reason to pick leblanc over zed, as LeBlanc needed the extra damage from Deathfire Grasp to stay equal with the burst damage that zed can put out through Death Mark. If you are looking for a champion with catch potential, Ahri will excel just as well - if not better than leblanc due to the fact that Charm has a longer range, faster projectile speed, a wider hit box, and instantly CCs her opponent whereas leblanc's Ethereal Chains are significantly more difficult to hit in comparison.
There's still a reason to pick LB over Zed. One of the reasons would be that you rather focus on early-mid-game, which is when she really excels. However, LB fell out of favour when her silence was removed. LeBlanc still has that early dominance that's pretty much only rivalled by Karma.
Ahri is the superior champion as a whole due to the nature of her kit, but still, she doesn't have that lane dominance that LeBlanc has. The comparison with Zed is kind of odd as well as the champions fulfil different roles. Honestly, Zed has gotten, once more, fairly “unfair” in nowadays meta game but that's no argument that condones Deathfire Grasp's presence.
utopus wrote:
GMD the reason Zed is being brought up is because leblanc is commonly thought of to be the AP version of zed. With Deathfire Grasp being removed, people are complaning about Zed in the scope that LeBlanc will no longer have the equivalent burst damage that zed can pack, provided that because of LeBlanc's inherent squishiness, she will be forced to Distortion towards a target.
Riot will have effectively taken leblanc out of the game. If you are looking for a champion with Burst, there will be no reason to pick leblanc over zed, as LeBlanc needed the extra damage from Deathfire Grasp to stay equal with the burst damage that zed can put out through Death Mark. If you are looking for a champion with catch potential, Ahri will excel just as well - if not better than leblanc due to the fact that Charm has a longer range, faster projectile speed, a wider hit box, and instantly CCs her opponent whereas leblanc's Ethereal Chains are significantly more difficult to hit in comparison.
Riot will have effectively taken leblanc out of the game. If you are looking for a champion with Burst, there will be no reason to pick leblanc over zed, as LeBlanc needed the extra damage from Deathfire Grasp to stay equal with the burst damage that zed can put out through Death Mark. If you are looking for a champion with catch potential, Ahri will excel just as well - if not better than leblanc due to the fact that Charm has a longer range, faster projectile speed, a wider hit box, and instantly CCs her opponent whereas leblanc's Ethereal Chains are significantly more difficult to hit in comparison.
But the most common LeBlanc build doesn't even use DFG lol, it's barely a nerf to her. She's still the "AP Zed".
LeBlanc shouldn't have as much burst as Zed because, however good his escapes may be, he's melee. He needs to get right up in someone's face to burst them, and he needs to stay longer than LeBlanc does to do it. LeBlanc can W forwards, burst someone's face off in half a second then W back to safety. Why should that combo (which has like a 20 second cooldown with 25% CDR) have just as much damage as Zed's riskier, longer cooldown burst?
Vapora Dark wrote:
But the most common LeBlanc build doesn't even use DFG lol, it's barely a nerf to her. She's still the "AP Zed".
LeBlanc shouldn't have as much burst as Zed because, however good his escapes may be, he's melee. He needs to get right up in someone's face to burst them, and he needs to stay longer than LeBlanc does to do it. LeBlanc can W forwards, burst someone's face off in half a second then W back to safety. Why should that combo (which has like a 20 second cooldown with 25% CDR) have just as much damage as Zed's riskier, longer cooldown burst?
Also, LeBlanc has insane pressure during the early levels and Zed doesn't even get close to that.
You need to log in before commenting.
How so? Exactly the same thing is required of both champs after you used the DFG active/Zed ult: sticking power and followup. You may argue that DFG is bonkers because it doesn't limit itself to the champion using it. Zhonya's hourglass prevents mage damage just as much as Zed's death mark trigger (which lategame he often doesn't even need) and of the DFG users. Is Zed being melee the issue? He has 3 shadows he can move out with, whereas Lissandra, as an example, is stuck there, hoping her W + Zhonya + Team followup are enough.
Whether or not Zed is well-designed and whether or not his ultimate is toxic or not are both up for debate, however it's also ultimately irrelevant to whether DFG actually contributes to this game or not. I don't see why you keep bringing up Zed's kit, because it has nothing to do with Deathfire Grasp's poor design.
Regarding the counterplay of this particular example: Zhonya's Hourglass pretty much thwarts all of Zed's plans in an instant and the timing isn't really all that important. Against DFG, that is much, much harder to do. Also, DFG's debuff lasts 4 seconds, is applied almost instantly without a clear indication. This opposed to both Hourglass and Death Mark, which last 2½ seconds and 3 seconds respectively. But as said, Zed's design isn't the discussion here, it's DFG.
Leblanc packs next to 0 utility, lol. Also, the mages are much more susceptible to direct engages, and they aren't nearly as mobile as Zed/Talon/Rengar/Kha nor are they as effective at splitpushing. Not to mention those four, if splitpushing, demand at least two people to stop them or pressure the enemy team to do a really good engage mid (coz 5v4), otherwise they'll take objectives for free. So they're also skipping utility for map pressure. And, apart from Syndra/Veigar/Leblanc, the burst is hardly comparable, not to mention that, once again, you're sending a champion with less bulk stats and, in most cases, less mobility, into a bad position.
LeBlanc packs 2 snares which also include a slow and comes with an exceptional amount of mobility, which is unmatched by any of the others. However, as stated before, the nature of the kits and roles of specific champions isn't up for debate it, it's whether DFG is a healthy addition to the game or not, and I am saying that it isn't. All I see you do is bring up champions which have something unfair – according to you – about them, and that somehow justifies DFG's existence. That's equivalent to saying that murder is okay because Hitler did something worse. In addition to this, all those champions fulfil completely different roles and aren't even all found in the same lane/position so you can hardly compare them at all. Syndra doesn't need DFG to pick people off with E and then burst them with ult. The R does an exceptional amount of damage as is and can instantly dispatch of any carry esque champion in the game.
Veigar is too archaic to bring to the conversation, even in his prime he wasn't competitive so comparing him is unfair and, as said, irrelevant.
Spare me the word distortion, I spoke of giving burst mages another tool to help make sure they can get their job done which is, well, bursting. And Zed doesn't have those tools because he's been balanced around what already exists. This brings us to the "Riot will rebalance these champs" point which, as I've said before, I can't trust until I've seen it, since I doubt they'll give champions like Lissandra more damage. This, in turn, means that people used to a certain playstyle with that champ - a more aggressive one - are obligated to choose something else, even when their build wasn't necessarily the most popular.
Burst mages have plenty of tools to get their job done, and that's, like the champions you've mentioned, all buried within their kits. The problem is that DFG is just more of the same **** and changes the impact certain champions have on the game. Lissandra isn't a burst mage and shouldn't be played as such. Same goes for various other ones, including, but not limited to, Vladimir and Mordekaiser. Additionally, burst mages are still mages, and therefore still pack a good chunk of utility next to the fact they have burst.
And in all fairness, I never brought up the “Riot will compensate” argument because I don't think it is an argument. I think removing DFG as it is right now is a good choice and should be healthy for the game. I don't mind the champions affected getting compensation in some shape or form, but whether that happens or not, that doesn't change the fact that DFG is unhealthy in the sense that it doesn't promote player interaction.
Oh, now we're resorting to direct offence, that's nice. I will not apologize for my "weird as **** Syndra build" it had a context and noone gave me better alternatives when I asked.
Your previous post suggests that you're just mad about its removal because you happen to be a Syndra player who frequently builds it.
If you want to argue, then yes, you do need to justify it. I've provided a fair amount of reasons why DFG is an unhealthy aspect of this game and why it just no longer has a place in it. DFG does not promote player interaction, which is rather weird considering we are playing a game. The fact that, right now, it doesn't hold a significant spot in the competitive scene doesn't mean that the item has no impact overall.
There's nothing healthy about champions who can just 100-0 enemies simply by using DFG and their other spells, whether that ends up breaking the game or not.
I know the logic behind using the item on Syndra – and on other champions for that matter – and I'm telling you that you're bad for building it – if that was the case, you misunderstood me. The unhealthy aspect about it is that Syndra doesn't even really need to hit her skills when going for a carry; she can also stack the Dark Spheres somewhere, then press DFG, then press R, and kill someone without fear of retaliation.
The biggest difference between the 100-0 mages such as Ahri, Lissandra, Syndra, and the likes can do with DFG, and the 100-0 potential champions such as Talon and Zed possess is the fact that mages have a higher degree of utility and pack CC to set up their combos, which makes it even harder to avoid the eventual combo; you cannot use Flash after you've been hit by a Charm, the Scatter the Weak stun, or Frozen Tomb so there's nothing you can do about the follow-up that consists of DFG + powerful spells.
I have not, will not, and shall not ever use that as an argument, because, frankly, it is not and will not ever be a valid argument. If you're trying to say that I'm an arrogant jerk, then sure, go ahead, but I've yet to hear an argument of why Deathfire Grasp is an aspect of the game that should persist.
P.S. If I actually had that attitude, I probably would not bother responding to each and everyone in detail regarding the subject, now would I?