FalseoGod's journey to Narnian Elo

[quote=TheBlueReaper]I use smartcast on everyone, but I keep range indicators on.[/quote]

[quote=FalseoGod]When I tried smartcast [[swain]] waaaay back it freaked me out. Now it's ok. I guess I can put the range indicators, helps with some champs. But mostly I've been doing well, I was already fast with skills. Might have to practice some like [[syndra]]. I am now at 56 points, won 8/4/3 with [[caitlyn]] despite my taric feeding their [[graves]]. Was pretty firm in lane and transitioned into teamfight phase smoothly. Died to [[kha'zix]] twice due to splitpush tactics on [[vladimir]] who had kha always nearbye.[/quote]

[quote=koksei]yeh I use smartcast with range indicators. like that you can keep the button pressed - e.g. on thresh and it wont go off until you stop pressing the button, and in case I do wanna spam my skills it still works :P[/quote]

[quote=Pølsemanden]i can't do the whole range indicators thing i'm continously rightclicking when i play even while trying to land skills which is why smartcast is totally necessary for me. When i play on my friends' computer he keeps shouting at me: "WHY DON'T YOU KILL HIM", then i shout back: "BECAUSE I CANCEL THE SKILL BECAUSE OF YOUR STUPID SETUP, JACKASS!" i have a golden middle ground setup inbetween the smartcast range thingie and smartcast. QWER - smartcast skills 1234 - normal cast skills T - normal cast item 3(for wards) 56 - smartcast item 12 Works like a charm.[/quote]

[quote=FalseoGod][center][color=#ff8000]Points: 86[/color][/center] Did 3 more rankeds today, 2 victories 1 defeat. Victories were [[ashe]] (pretty damn fed, 11-4 ranked total now) and [[nami]], defeat was support [[karma]]. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/nE6jnTP.png[/IMG] To all the disbelievers out there, [[nami]] rox. We had some great engages bot, multitasked pretty well. Only danger was our [[zed]] who gave zhao two kills, switched with jarvan and gave morgana another kill.[/quote]

[quote=Wayne3100]People aren't generally disbelievers when it comes to [[Nami]] in general (or at least shouldn't be), but the main problem is you can get screwed pretty hard if you miss Q. Sure, you might say "get skill noob", but the fact of the matter is certain abilities (such as [[Graves]] dash) make it quite simple to dodge.[/quote]

[quote=Pølsemanden]janna es just a better version of nami.[/quote]

[quote=FalseoGod]I find them totally different, Nami allows a different type of durability in lane and her ult is amazing. As for the eternal Q question, you have to keep your cool about it's usage. People try to engage with it more than they remember to counter another's engage. Q is pretty good engaging if you [i]know[/i] you'll hit, and many champions allow that assurance (ashe's kiting+r, tristana's W, varus E+ult, graves W + your E). I know she isn't perfect, but she's waaay too discredited. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZFSde6Q.png[/IMG] Ooh boy, challenge accepted. Pretty standard game, didn't get a lot in tfs since they were pretty mobile, both deaths were devastating zhao ganks setup by twitch's slow. Twitch himself was a sad joke, couldn't position for crap nor know how to use the surprise factor (tried once, died). He ain't got nothing on Mobafire's Banana[/quote]

[quote=Pølsemanden][quote=FalseoGod] I find them totally different, Nami allows a different type of durability in lane and her ult is amazing. As for the eternal Q question, you have to keep your cool about it's usage. People try to engage with it more than they remember to counter another's engage. Q is pretty good engaging if you [i]know[/i] you'll hit, and many champions allow that assurance (ashe's kiting+r, tristana's W, varus E+ult, graves W + your E). I know she isn't perfect, but she's waaay too discredited. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZFSde6Q.png[/IMG] Ooh boy, challenge accepted. Pretty standard game, didn't get a lot in tfs since they were pretty mobile, both deaths were devastating zhao ganks setup by twitch's slow. Twitch himself was a sad joke, couldn't position for crap nor know how to use the surprise factor (tried once, died). He ain't got nothing on Mobafire's Banana [/quote] Their passives are quite similar except nami is slightly stronger and jannas is global Janna Q is very similar to nami q except jannas has a line-hitbox and nami has an aoe-hitbox. W and E Janna side: MS boost, slow, Shield, damage boost Nami side: Ms boost, slow, heal, damage boost Janna R and nami R are very similar it's a teamwide displacement, jannas is instant and namis is with a slight traveling time. Namis is better for offensive purposes and Jannas is much better for defensive ones. +on nami Heal, ult better for offensive cc, stronger offensive cc on q +on janna Stronger damage increase on ad-carry, ult much better for defensive cc, AOE-heal, stronger slow, bigger cc area on q and last but definitely not least janna can cancel self-pulls(jarvan e-q, amumu q and leona e) Janna is just so much stronger for a squishy support.[/quote]

[quote=Pheyniex][[Janna]] doesn't fit hard engage comps as well as [[Nami]]. She also works for a bit of counter-initiation, even though not as strong as [[Janna]]'s.[/quote]