SkidmarkD wrote:
In the end, wominz are just humans. They're trying to take advantage wherever they can. Feminism is no exception.
This is pretty much how it is, people sometimes forget that.
Change is gooooood
Picture by: Janitsudude
Want to advertise your guide, but don't know where? Click here for an opportunity of a lifetime!
throatslasher wrote:
ImageWow.
That has got to be the most ******ed collection of sentences I've seen this year. Even Thalia's comment stands no chance against the raw idiocy at display here.
Also, her agenda shines through like a ****ing sun. The victim is usually blamed for the rape? Oh really now?..
"Gold can't buy you rape." - Mr Sark
throatslasher wrote:
Especially when someone in League says "Get Raped!" I'm just in tears for two weeks.
IceCreamy wrote:
I'm actually against abortion, unless it's because of rape.
...
If you make a bad call, you have to face the consequences. You can't ***** out... Especially if the *****ing out includes murdering.
? What's the difference between a baby conceived from being raped and a baby conceived by accident due to no protection? You can't just say, "Oh, the rape baby doesn't deserve to live." It's pretty hypocritical. An unwanted baby is an unwanted baby, regardless of whether they were conceived by rape or accident.
What if a family of 6 heard they were having another baby and couldn't afford it? You'd rather them have the baby in poverty, or put it up for adoption?
Also, it's fine and dandy to say "face the consequences" when females have to pay heeeaps for contraceptive and remember to take it every day. Can't wait until it's guys who have to take contraceptive pills. It's funny because males are shooting sperm into females - shouldn't the sperm then be rendered inactive, as opposed to altering the female cycle?
YayaFTW wrote:
Of course I'm not against hunting, we have the right to hunt because that's how the pyramid of the strongest works. If there were stronger creatures on earth than human, we'd be the ones hunted aswell.
What I meant by soul is "life". It's like you revoke a human the right to live on earth when you get an abortion.
Saying 'soul' while meaning 'life' is kinda stupid, but that's already been pointed out, so never mind that.
In essence, life is only 'sacred' when it comes to humans, no other species?
You're using an ancient way of looking at life, from a time where humankind didn't know anything about how cells work nor how their own bodies operated beyond the most basic of functions.
Clinging to past views when there is a ton of new information that need to be taken into consideration is just stupid.
YayaFTW wrote:
That unwanted child is a human soul, it's not up to us to decide whether he deserves to live on this earth or not.
Here's further proof of your thoughts on humanity's superiority.
How? Because it would be easy to disprove that statement if you replace "human soul" with 'life'.
YayaFTW wrote:
Is it a fetus's fault that it can't live on its own or is it the pregnant woman's fault for *****ing out and running away from responsibility and not assuming her choices in life?
The fetus did nothing wrong, I don't see why it should pay the price of the woman's errors. I still prefer she gives birth and donate the baby to a family that can't have children or an institution for orphans than "get rid of it"..
First off, think about THE CHILD (Isn't it ironic how people supposedly thinking of the well being of the child don't actually think about the child itself?). How well do you think an unwanted child would grow up? Chances of that child growing up to be less than happy are probably higher than that of a "wanted" child.
Secondly(and mainly), a fetus is not sentient. The fetus cannot "pay" for someone else's errors as it's not sentient. It is a large collection of cells evolving into a human being(not sure if evolving is the right word, but you get my meaning). You're not "killing" a living, thinking being when you're "killing" a fetus. Animals on the other hand are sentient and yet you have no qualms about killing them. It just goes to show how much you value humankind over any other race and don't actually give **** about life itself..
Third, humankind is overpopulating the earth. We might actually be saving lives and improving living standards by preventing more people from being born.
Taking those points into account I can then make the conclusion that it's probable that more people will become unhappy from this child being born than there would be if the child were not.
Is that not the logical conclusion?
Go ahead, present your contrived reasoning so I can tear it apart.
IceCreamy wrote:
Wut? This has nothing do with being smart or not, it's my opinion on the matter ;)
If you make a bad call, you have to face the consequences. You can't ***** out... Especially if the *****ing out includes murdering.
Oh, 'it' being your terrible analogy very much has something to do with your being smart.
Then again, being against abortion is pretty stupid too.
Aren't you killing millions of unborn children every week, you hypocrite?
"Blizzard spoke thus; Thou shalt not BM. And the players replied Nay, I shall Play my hand with Lethal already on the board. And so Blizzard sent unto them this Brawl of Yogg, As a lesson for their sins of Pride and Greed, for he is the Prophet of Madness and RNG. On that day, the tavern descended into an era of chaos and darkness, until the weekend passed and everyone forgot all about it. Amen. Book of SMOrc, Verse 20, Chapter 4." - Feam T
Werepirelord wrote:
I am a Level 5 Laser Lotus.
Do you even have the energyon cubes to get to level 3?
I'm a level 7 Cyber Fetus.
Get on my level.
"Gold can't buy you rape." - Mr Sark
You need to log in before commenting.
<Editor>