Stupid youngsters and their new fancy technology! Back in my day, we used to buy books from the local store. They were all 80 euros per piece. I used to have a whole closet full of those things, just for following one study.
Now those were the good ol' times
Now those were the good ol' times



Picture by: My valentine; jamespongebob <3
Want to advertise your guide, but don't know where? Click here for an opportunity of a lifetime!
throatslasher wrote:
This isn't reddit. Can we NOT make off-topic threads about stuff when it hits the frontpage?
I don't use Reddit.
Meiyjhe wrote:
Stupid youngsters and their new fancy technology! Back in my day, we used to buy books from the local store. They were all 80 euros per piece. I used to have a whole closet full of those things, just for following one study.
Now those were the good ol' times
Yeah, **** all those good for nothing youngsters.
I'm personally really annoyed by the fact that many digital books cost almost the same as the physical books.
A physical book probably costs at least a few euros for the manufacturing and all the shipping and stuff(3-5 total?). Then they sell it for 10-20€.
A digital book costs less than a ****ing cent to manufacture and ship. They sell it for ~10€.
Lower the prices and more people would buy them. The way it is now is just annoying.
"We've had a few gloomy years with bad console ports, and what do we get in the light at the end of the console-tunnel? A tablet OS ported to PC." - Atlas Tasume, on Windows 8
My only issue is that if you lose your reader, you lose ALL of your books. I'm perfectly happy with swapping all the books on my bookshelf for one reader, but it's a much bigger loss if I somehow get careless with it, than if I was careless with a paperback.
Searz wrote:
This is one big step towards books being primarily read in digital form.
SOOO many resources will be saved by using digital instead of physical books.
I have an issue with this perspective:
People that rely on digital data usually take big care regarding the storage. My point is, even though digital storage is quite widespread and usable, it may not be as reliable. It is usual for me to talk to someone about this and having a response of maintaining 5 backups in different physical devices, one of them being a source, then a number of USB defices and cloud services. A end user cannot control the faliure of these devices, even some may require a bit of frequent use. Saving resources is a debatable feature.
Personally, I like to have a physical copy. It doesn't force me to turn on a specific device that has its own dependancies (namely energy). I can also say I prefer having a physical example since a filename of various I might deal with will not say as much as a distinctive cover, especially when in search of a very specific feature within the document.
Not to mention you will have physical evidence of ownership that you can consult with the reach of an arm.
Having a database of all books is commendable but I would hardly use it.
the only thing i don't like about the slow move to digital platforms over physical is that companies try and squeeze out consumer rights. you aren't purchasing a game/movie/music etc you're purchasing a license with the right to play/watch/listen to said whatever and we can revoke that license with no refund.
I like things that make me feel stupid. - Ken Levine
Searz wrote:
^Of course, it's in human nature to be scared of change and cling to old ways.
It doesn't matter if the change is for the better to many people, because they're used to the old way and "like it more".
I guess nostalgia might be a factor.
that wasnt really the point of my post, me i would much rather have a digital copy of an album but if i had the ability to get a signed physical copy of a CD i would rather have that, its not about clinging to old ways more about having something signed, but im sure there are still people that want physical things because digital stuff is new and scary

Thanks to TheNamelessBard for the signature
Looking forward to a future where texts can be accessed legally online free. However, I imagine ads will be the cost of free texts.
Pheyniex wrote:
People that rely on digital data usually take big care regarding the storage. My point is, even though digital storage is quite widespread and usable, it may not be as reliable. It is usual for me to talk to someone about this and having a response of maintaining 5 backups in different physical devices, one of them being a source, then a number of USB defices and cloud services. A end user cannot control the faliure of these devices, even some may require a bit of frequent use.
You have a point for general usage, but not for E-Books. E-Books are so incredibly easy to back up and keep safe that this is simply not an issue. The amount of space taken by an E-Book is usually around 1MegaByte(most of which is taken up by the cover art, lol). Backing that stuff up manually takes about as long as it takes for you to press ctrl+c -> ctrl+v. And then there's services like Google Play Books that allow you to upload all your E-Books and then download/read them through your browser or app wherever and whenever.
Quoted:
I can also say I prefer having a physical example since a filename of various I might deal with will not say as much as a distinctive cover, especially when in search of a very specific feature within the document.
Then you're not doing it correctly(or just talkin' out your arse), because it's the cover that is shown most prominently in most readers.
Quoted:
Saving resources is a debatable feature.
No, saving resources is a definite fact.
The electricity required to power a device used to read a book is REALLY low. Especially if it's a mobile device like a tablet. Reading text is not a taxing activity.
Vacuuming for 10min requires more power than reading a digital book on your tablet for 100hours.
Quoted:
Having a database of all books is commendable but I would hardly use it.
Don't worry, there are tons of others that will.
caucheka wrote:
the only thing i don't like about the slow move to digital platforms over physical is that companies try and squeeze out consumer rights. you aren't purchasing a game/movie/music etc you're purchasing a license with the right to play/watch/listen to said whatever and we can revoke that license with no refund.
Agreed. That is a problem.
Most E-books are DRM free though, so that's not as big of a problem for books as it is for games.
DillButt64 wrote:
that wasnt really the point of my post, me i would much rather have a digital copy of an album but if i had the ability to get a signed physical copy of a CD i would rather have that, its not about clinging to old ways more about having something signed, but im sure there are still people that want physical things because digital stuff is new and scary
Oh, I see.
The moment a religious person unknowingly calls his own ways stupid: "And lol. I highly doubt you have magic powers. If you proved it I would believe you, but since you 'refuse to', I choose not to."
You need to log in before commenting.
<Member>