And when the blood was sprinkled on the ground where nothing could grow, the Children of the Dragon did spring up, the People of the Dragon, armed to dance with death till shade is gone, till water is gone, into the Shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath, to spit into Sightblinder's eye on the Last Day. And he did call them forth from the wasted lands, and they did shake the world with battle.
FalseoGod wrote:
This
And Tosh, like I said I look at plat + players, sometimes only diamond, and on SoloQ too. I don't look at the entirety of LoL players at all for the reasons you stated.
Wow, so you don't even regard gold players as real people?
Actually, I don't either. They're like the generation 4 of pokemon; The only reason why they exist is so that we can have an excuse to have another pokemon game on a better hand held.
I mean, other than furbait lucario, who actually gave a **** about gen 4? That's right, nobody. And dweebs. That's who.
rekh wrote:
Not that I disagree that this can skew stats, but there is the interesting website champion.gg which provides a ton of stats on champions drawing from ranked games plat and above.
Are you trying to sell me something? Cause most people that do usually get bit.
Toshabi wrote:
I wanna point to the fact that the majority of LoL players are gold and under.
Actually the majority of LOL players are Silver 3 and under. Not a huge difference but still.
Spare a few Rep+ for the poor ( ã¤â—•â—¡â—•)ã¤
 Check out my Brand guide linked in my signature |
Vengenator wrote:
Actually the majority of LOL players are Silver 3 and under. Not a huge difference but still.
Oh. I'm sorry.
BAD LoL players.
#EliteLoLPlayers #ComeOnStepItUp #YoureTooSlow #ComeGetSoem
MrCuddowls wrote:
Hahahaha telling me my items are bad HHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAhA
Listen buddy don't judge someone's items if your only level 13
This build is Platinum approved, Thats all you need to know
Vengenator wrote:
Actually the majority of LOL players are Silver 3 and under. Not a huge difference but still.
What you said does not invalidate what he said. I could say the majority of LoL players are diamond and under and it'd still be true.
Thanks to The_Nameless_Bard for the sig!
Toshabi wrote:
I mean, other than furbait lucario, who actually gave a **** about gen 4? That's right, nobody. And dweebs. That's who.
Hey, I liked gen 4... a bit... (probably only because Mismagius is one of my favorite pokemon :<)
yeah gen4 sucked
EDIT: ey Froslass was a pretty good design too imo
EDIT2: Hax, do you think lulu is a viable top/mid pick outside of situations where you have a hypercarry on your team? I mean whenever I pick her top or mid with a duo q partner that plays kogmaw, vayne or heck even something like jinx it's usually a free win but I was wondering if I could comfortably pick her in solo q and stuff
@Xeres - usually only if you have a high damage mid and an ad carry that isnt urgot and you are comfortable in the lane matchup. her low damage really isnt that big a problem in soloq imo tho, especially if u can roam and make plays since soloq games rarely get to 5v5 teamfight stages. u should be picking skirmishes u can win anyway, so her damage in those arent that big a problem. im a believer that if u can smash lane 9/10 times its worth picking something (as long as its not a champ that literally is only good in lane)
You need to log in before commenting.
Not that I disagree that this can skew stats, but there is the interesting website champion.gg which provides a ton of stats on champions drawing from ranked games plat and above.
What do people think of