I find a guide being good is decided by who has actually reviewed it, and how detailed the comments are. Everyone knows that comments like "lololol, epic guide man" aren't exactly as thought through as a comment that points out all the good sides of the guide, but also notices some flaws. The amount of these kinds of comments, and whether or not you can see that the guide has adapted to this critisism.
That is a sign of a good guide, and a dedicated guide writer.
That is a sign of a good guide, and a dedicated guide writer.
Check out my comprehensive guide for Jax !!
-
Make sure to hit that +Rep button if I helped you out, and you feel I deserve it! :)
-
Make sure to hit that +Rep button if I helped you out, and you feel I deserve it! :)
Yeah I agree, there should really be more review threads, even if you're 800 ELO, writer could miss something, provide wrong information etc. Constructive criticism is always a good thing if the criticizer has solid explanation for his feedback.
Life is 10% of what happens to you and 90% of how you react to it.
Sigs made by: LaCorpse, jhoijhoi, Katoki, JEFFY40HANDS, The_Nameless_Bard and Sk1llbug
-||- Check out my Master Yi guide -||-
You need to log in before commenting.
Since many things manipulates those percentages... even so, try to learn the game basics to judge good/bad yourself in most cases, guides should only be used as a guideline.
There're many cases where a guide is unjustified bot or top, thanks to upvotes by LoL beginners, troll votes, "friends" or just the fact that the one guide top is upvoted because he's top.