Ahhh humility. An oft forgotton trait in this day and age.
No, questions are always welcome. Questions show thought. Thought shows attention and care for what one is doing.
Well. In most cases. But you're clearly not just being lazy, so hey =D
AWAITING NEXTVICTIM CLIENT
No, questions are always welcome. Questions show thought. Thought shows attention and care for what one is doing.
Well. In most cases. But you're clearly not just being lazy, so hey =D
AWAITING NEXT
Want a guide destroyed? reviewed?
Hi, could u please check out my Wukong guide? Link in signature.
Wukong Solo Top Guide
Click it, or else.....
Click it, or else.....
Considering how you couldn't be arsed to read my first post, the answer is no.
Want a guide destroyed? reviewed?
Your name : Pimboy12
Link to your guide : In my signature
Any specific points that I should look at?: What I am missing
Why should i review your guide?: It is my first
Why do you want your guide reviewed? : Because it is my first, I want to know if it is good.
Link to your guide : In my signature
Any specific points that I should look at?: What I am missing
Why should i review your guide?: It is my first
Why do you want your guide reviewed? : Because it is my first, I want to know if it is good.
Wukong Solo Top Guide
Click it, or else.....
Click it, or else.....
Pimboy:
RAGE LEVEL: HIGH
God. Dammit. I don't like being mean, I don't like dressing people down either. But ********, I'll be blunt. Have you even bothered?
Let's start with the basics. If you had seen the better guides on this website you would have known a thing or two about presentation and what's needed in a good guide.
Your honour, I present to the court: Exhibit A.
Let's not even talk grammar. Simply reading the first few sentences and seeing: "I will tell you everything how to dominate toplane" made me already go "Oh... this is going to be great..."
So, running through the "masteries" section as an example.
First, we have random capitalisations dotted around the place.
Second, spelling. "tankyness, tanky ness". Come on. how are they both going to be right?
Third, abbreviations. I don't know about the deterioration of language in general, but having to read "u" everywhere drives me insane. And since I've read around the other review shops who spell this out as an example of what they would find in a bad guide, I know I'm not alone.
You want further areas where spelling is atrocious? Champion matchups. Errors everywhere.
You know. Basic courtesy to the person who you want to read it. Make it readable.
In all honesty, I was tempted to give up already. But since the duty of professionalism calls, I continued. Um. Holy ****. Cardinal sin no2.
The whole point of writing a guide is to give information to people. That's the fundamental principle of it. As an extension, it's meant to be right .
Again, under masteries:
"Vigor" "More health regen adds extra sustain. You now heal faster when out of combat. "
What? Suddenly a mastery is a Garen passive? What part of it says you have to be out of combat?
Further errors:
"Leblanc: She creates a clone every 60 seconds her health is under 30%".
ARRGGHHH. Ok, let's ignore the blatant error that is what the sentence actually says if you were to take it literally.
For one, it's 40%.
For two, are you really telling me the only threat to wukong is her passive? Because that's all you've written about her in it.
Absolutely should be shot for errors:
Decoy: "5 Use it to check bushes, u are invinceble so this should go easy."
WHAT?!?!?
Cardinal sin no3.
Let's get this straight. writing opinion isn't bad in itself. Writing opinion without backing it up will land you in deep water in so many situations it isn't even funny. Ref: Real life.
I submit the following to the court:
Kennen: " Watch out for his overpowerd ulti that will stun you instantly."
A) ref to cardinal sin 2. It's not instant.
B) Why is it overpowered? Since we've already debunked the following part, I have no other recourse left to me but to suggest you lack experience, as is the case with most people who cry "OP!"
I further add the following:
Fiddlesticks: "You can't kill him since his drain is over powerd and you don't have any silence"
A) Ref sin2. Yep. you don't have a silence. But that;s not the only way of interrupting his drain.
B) So... it's OP because you don't have a silence? Assume someone uses your guide and sees this. WHat does it do then? .
Leona: "Try a skin with sunglasses if fighting against her".
Seriously? -1 damage. WOOOO. Oh wait. Wukong has a skin with sun glasses now? Where? What? I dont even.
Okokokokok. I took a chill pill and I'll point out other things i didn't like either:
1) Poor Formatting.
In general, it's just too cramped. I.e: "facing enemys".
I'm ignoring the spelling error. This looks like text, balanced with more text. For the best example of what i'm on about, look from fiddle->fiora->fizz. It's almost like a whole block of text.
You have a habit of describing what they do, which is fine, but not spelling out "what" they do. I.e, Alistar: "Try to harras him when he used his ground smash"
. I mean, anyone with knowledge will know you mean
Pulverize, but if you assume from the get go from writing a guide that people know everything, then why the heck is there any point in writing a guide?
2) Lack of information
You've got a build. Ok. You've got runes. Ok. You've got masteries. Ok.
And the rest of it? Laning? Team fights?
3) Inflexible build.
THere's nothing there to suggest alternatives. Would you really build
Mercury's Treads vs
Fiora, or any of the normal solo-top champions?
You've got no discussion of said items in context of the situation. Would you really build
Warmog's Armor, for instance, if you were totally destroying the lane instead of a
Trinity Force? I doubt it.
You have no discussion of why you don't get other items. Thing's like
Randuin's Omen stick out to me as items which should be discussed.
3.5) Build is sub-optimal.
In my opinion,
Warmog's Armor->
Trinity Force->
Atma's Impaler takes too long to do damage, and is highly expensive.
It's normally
Warmog's Armor->
Atma's Impaler, then more tanky items.
4) No actual clear role.
This ties with 2. The title of the guide is "the anti-tank". Um... Ok. Let's run with this for a moment. There's actually nothing in this guide what so ever that would help explain either what this role is, when to adopt it, and indeed how to do it.
My honest opinion is that bruisers in general don't go around beating up tanks. In fact, I think no one's meant to deliberately go around beating up tanks. You're meant to be harassing their squishies... But maybe i'm wrong. Assume that for a moment. Ignore this paragraph, but at least take on board what I wrote in the previous one.
And on bits i simply don't get:
I wanted to write that you lack experience, not only in writing guides, but to playing in general. (Read: Cardinal sin2). But in other instances, you show that you know stuff: Leesin's E countering your decoy. How to mess around with people with
Warrior Trickster. Ergo, I'm not going to be as all-out harsh as I might have been.
It's "£~@&$!.
You have a LOT of work to do.
I spelt it out in my first post. Come to me, expect to be savaged.
I have detailed quite a few of the flaws in your guide to an extent I doubt others would have the patience to. I suggest you use it constructively.
-1.
I'll look again in a week to see if anything has changed. If you wish to appeal, you may do so.
The prosecution rests, your Honour.
RAGE LEVEL: HIGH
God. Dammit. I don't like being mean, I don't like dressing people down either. But ********, I'll be blunt. Have you even bothered?
Let's start with the basics. If you had seen the better guides on this website you would have known a thing or two about presentation and what's needed in a good guide.
Your honour, I present to the court: Exhibit A.
You haven't bothered to put it through a spell checker.
Let's not even talk grammar. Simply reading the first few sentences and seeing: "I will tell you everything how to dominate toplane" made me already go "Oh... this is going to be great..."
So, running through the "masteries" section as an example.
First, we have random capitalisations dotted around the place.
Second, spelling. "tankyness, tanky ness". Come on. how are they both going to be right?
Third, abbreviations. I don't know about the deterioration of language in general, but having to read "u" everywhere drives me insane. And since I've read around the other review shops who spell this out as an example of what they would find in a bad guide, I know I'm not alone.
You want further areas where spelling is atrocious? Champion matchups. Errors everywhere.
You know. Basic courtesy to the person who you want to read it. Make it readable.
In all honesty, I was tempted to give up already. But since the duty of professionalism calls, I continued. Um. Holy ****. Cardinal sin no2.
You're writing ****
The whole point of writing a guide is to give information to people. That's the fundamental principle of it. As an extension, it's meant to be right .
Again, under masteries:
"Vigor" "More health regen adds extra sustain. You now heal faster when out of combat. "
What? Suddenly a mastery is a Garen passive? What part of it says you have to be out of combat?
Further errors:
"Leblanc: She creates a clone every 60 seconds her health is under 30%".
ARRGGHHH. Ok, let's ignore the blatant error that is what the sentence actually says if you were to take it literally.
For one, it's 40%.
For two, are you really telling me the only threat to wukong is her passive? Because that's all you've written about her in it.
Absolutely should be shot for errors:
Decoy: "5 Use it to check bushes, u are invinceble so this should go easy."
WHAT?!?!?
Cardinal sin no3.
You're writing opinion
Let's get this straight. writing opinion isn't bad in itself. Writing opinion without backing it up will land you in deep water in so many situations it isn't even funny. Ref: Real life.
I submit the following to the court:
Kennen: " Watch out for his overpowerd ulti that will stun you instantly."
A) ref to cardinal sin 2. It's not instant.
B) Why is it overpowered? Since we've already debunked the following part, I have no other recourse left to me but to suggest you lack experience, as is the case with most people who cry "OP!"
I further add the following:
Fiddlesticks: "You can't kill him since his drain is over powerd and you don't have any silence"
A) Ref sin2. Yep. you don't have a silence. But that;s not the only way of interrupting his drain.
B) So... it's OP because you don't have a silence? Assume someone uses your guide and sees this. WHat does it do then? .
You have parts in this guide that are totally irrelevant
Leona: "Try a skin with sunglasses if fighting against her".
Seriously? -1 damage. WOOOO. Oh wait. Wukong has a skin with sun glasses now? Where? What? I dont even.
Okokokokok. I took a chill pill and I'll point out other things i didn't like either:
1) Poor Formatting.
In general, it's just too cramped. I.e: "facing enemys".
I'm ignoring the spelling error. This looks like text, balanced with more text. For the best example of what i'm on about, look from fiddle->fiora->fizz. It's almost like a whole block of text.
You have a habit of describing what they do, which is fine, but not spelling out "what" they do. I.e, Alistar: "Try to harras him when he used his ground smash"
. I mean, anyone with knowledge will know you mean

2) Lack of information
You've got a build. Ok. You've got runes. Ok. You've got masteries. Ok.
And the rest of it? Laning? Team fights?
3) Inflexible build.
THere's nothing there to suggest alternatives. Would you really build


You've got no discussion of said items in context of the situation. Would you really build


You have no discussion of why you don't get other items. Thing's like

3.5) Build is sub-optimal.
In my opinion,



It's normally


4) No actual clear role.
This ties with 2. The title of the guide is "the anti-tank". Um... Ok. Let's run with this for a moment. There's actually nothing in this guide what so ever that would help explain either what this role is, when to adopt it, and indeed how to do it.
My honest opinion is that bruisers in general don't go around beating up tanks. In fact, I think no one's meant to deliberately go around beating up tanks. You're meant to be harassing their squishies... But maybe i'm wrong. Assume that for a moment. Ignore this paragraph, but at least take on board what I wrote in the previous one.
And on bits i simply don't get:
I wanted to write that you lack experience, not only in writing guides, but to playing in general. (Read: Cardinal sin2). But in other instances, you show that you know stuff: Leesin's E countering your decoy. How to mess around with people with

Conclusions:
It's "£~@&$!.
You have a LOT of work to do.
I spelt it out in my first post. Come to me, expect to be savaged.
I have detailed quite a few of the flaws in your guide to an extent I doubt others would have the patience to. I suggest you use it constructively.
-1.
I'll look again in a week to see if anything has changed. If you wish to appeal, you may do so.
The prosecution rests, your Honour.
Want a guide destroyed? reviewed?
OH HAAIIZ CNA YOU PLOZ REVIEW MEH GUIDEZX PLEEEEZZZZ!
I THINK IT BEASTESTS GUIDE EVAR AND IS JUST NEED COMMENT/RATING TO HIT 1!
Serious part starts now:
Your name: SkullzX or Skullz
Link to your guide :http://www.mobafire.com/league-of-legends/build/riven-broken-sword-style-215910?revision
Any specific points that I should look at?: Well my grammer/spelling probably aren't the best so you can bully me on that...also any pointers of things to add would help :)
Why should i review your guide?: You will have fun doing it well at the same time expanding your knowledge of Riven? On a more serious note I would like a good hard serious review! Yes yes this is probably suicide due to my grammer skills are pretty bad no matter how many times I read it over XD
Why do you want your guide reviewed? : As mentioned above I want a good solid overall review of my guide!
Side note: I use Q alot just because putting
Broken Wings 3 times in almost every sentence would look bad and take up to much space IMO.
I THINK IT BEASTESTS GUIDE EVAR AND IS JUST NEED COMMENT/RATING TO HIT 1!
Serious part starts now:
Your name: SkullzX or Skullz
Link to your guide :http://www.mobafire.com/league-of-legends/build/riven-broken-sword-style-215910?revision
Any specific points that I should look at?: Well my grammer/spelling probably aren't the best so you can bully me on that...also any pointers of things to add would help :)
Why should i review your guide?: You will have fun doing it well at the same time expanding your knowledge of Riven? On a more serious note I would like a good hard serious review! Yes yes this is probably suicide due to my grammer skills are pretty bad no matter how many times I read it over XD
Why do you want your guide reviewed? : As mentioned above I want a good solid overall review of my guide!
Side note: I use Q alot just because putting

Totallynotn00b wrote:
Conclusions:
It's "£~@&$!.
You have a LOT of work to do.
I spelt it out in my first post. Come to me, expect to be savaged.
I have detailed quite a few of the flaws in your guide to an extent I doubt others would have the patience to. I suggest you use it constructively.
-1.
I'll look again in a week to see if anything has changed. If you wish to appeal, you may do so.
The prosecution rests, your Honour.
Thanks for the critical responce. I now know what I am doing wrong. And sorry for my bad grammar, I am not English. I will look over evertything again and I hope that next week you will react suprised. Again, thanks for reading my WHOLE guide. Cya next week.
Wukong Solo Top Guide
Click it, or else.....
Click it, or else.....
Your name H4xDefender
Link to your guide : http://www.mobafire.com/league-of-legends/build/competitive-solo-top-jungle-jax-206488
Any specific points that I should look at?: Nope
Why should i review your guide?: Its a strong jax build.
Why do you want your guide reviewed? : I want to improve my guide.
Link to your guide : http://www.mobafire.com/league-of-legends/build/competitive-solo-top-jungle-jax-206488
Any specific points that I should look at?: Nope
Why should i review your guide?: Its a strong jax build.
Why do you want your guide reviewed? : I want to improve my guide.

You need to log in before commenting.
Do you get teh impression i'm going to mercilessly hunt you down or something? ;>