Pwnzor1130 wrote:
So, why is everybody excited about Boron Trifluoride? It's not that exciting. The only thing special about it is that Boron's valence shell has 6 electrons.
*facepalm*

Thanks to The_Nameless_Bard for the sig!
Searz,
most FPS campaigns just feel slapped on...don't judge the game by that...the main focus of the game is the multiplayer..
most FPS campaigns just feel slapped on...don't judge the game by that...the main focus of the game is the multiplayer..
Bloofyre wrote:
May a squadron of beautiful vaginas find their way to your crotch by day's end.
Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
^What he said.
When I buy Battlefield I buy multiplayer epicness. And that is exactly what you get. No other FPS can match BF3s multiplayer at the moment.
The last good singleplayer FPS I have played was Bioshock 1, liked the story and ambience a lot. (even if the AI could have been tweaked a little)
Still waiting for a FPS that can match the story telling of a game like mass effect, but I believe that would cause big scars in my face because of all the smiling...
When I buy Battlefield I buy multiplayer epicness. And that is exactly what you get. No other FPS can match BF3s multiplayer at the moment.
The last good singleplayer FPS I have played was Bioshock 1, liked the story and ambience a lot. (even if the AI could have been tweaked a little)
Still waiting for a FPS that can match the story telling of a game like mass effect, but I believe that would cause big scars in my face because of all the smiling...
Fox Rage wrote:
Blowfeld. Best Party Wrecker Worldwide.

Who cares about Singleplayer?
I want massive maps, 50 players at the same time, intense electronic warfare encased in spotless design and perfect execution.
If I want singleplayer.. Eh, I don't go looking in the FPS genre. We all know that's all about multiplayer.
I want massive maps, 50 players at the same time, intense electronic warfare encased in spotless design and perfect execution.
If I want singleplayer.. Eh, I don't go looking in the FPS genre. We all know that's all about multiplayer.

Scrax wrote:
Who cares about Singleplayer?
I want massive maps, 50 players at the same time, intense electronic warfare encased in spotless design and perfect execution.
If I want singleplayer.. Eh, I don't go looking in the FPS genre. We all know that's all about multiplayer.
Buy MAG.
wRAthoFVuLK wrote:
Searz,
most FPS campaigns just feel slapped on...don't judge the game by that...the main focus of the game is the multiplayer..
That's a dumb excuse.
They could very well just make it multiplayer only instead. That would be better than having a ****ty champaign.
"I saw [Twilight: Eclipse] in theaters with a girl I was dating at the time. I spent more time staring at my toes and wiggling them than I did watching this abomination. When Edward proposed to Blank Face, I finally looked up with a revelation.
I blurted out loud, in a dead silent theater full of teenage girls on opening night "Wait a minute, Edward has no blood flow. How does he get an erection?" I heard several men laughing, and had several girls turn and stare at me.
I did not get laid that night." - Berengier817
I blurted out loud, in a dead silent theater full of teenage girls on opening night "Wait a minute, Edward has no blood flow. How does he get an erection?" I heard several men laughing, and had several girls turn and stare at me.
I did not get laid that night." - Berengier817
Searz wrote:
That's a dumb excuse.
They could very well just make it multiplayer only instead. That would be better than having a ****ty champaign.
QFT... as mentioned before, just look at MAG's example... they just focused on MP
You need to log in before commenting.
<Veteran>
(random note but i did say "lux what are you doing in the bushes? you are not garen get out of there, you look silly.")