This thread is locked
PLEASE NOTE: This thread has been locked by the moderators. You cannot reply to it.
304 posts - page 15 of 31
wrath please just cuz i commented on yer ranked thread doesnt mean you can moan my name while frowning and winking at the same time D; but yeah dont rage act like i do in games and just make jokes in all chat or just not talk at all, in fact in a recent game i complimented the guy on the other team carrying and he spared my life :D then I BACK STABBED HIM AND LET HIM KNOW IN ALL CHAT IM NOT TO BE TRUSTED, but yeah just play ranked like its a game and have fun with it wins and losses dont even matter
[quote=DillButt64]wrath please just cuz i commented on yer ranked thread doesnt mean you can moan my name while frowning and winking at the same time D; but yeah dont rage act like i do in games and just make jokes in all chat or just not talk at all, in fact in a recent game i complimented the guy on the other team carrying and he spared my life :D then I BACK STABBED HIM AND LET HIM KNOW IN ALL CHAT IM NOT TO BE TRUSTED, but yeah just play ranked like its a game and have fun with it wins and losses dont even matter[/quote]

Thanks to TheNamelessBard for the signature
Another win with Zyra support. Only thing I'm winning with recently =/
JAI PLS
JAI PLS
[quote=wRAthoFVuLK]Another win with Zyra support. Only thing I'm winning with recently =/
JAI PLS[/quote]

Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
Forgot to screenshot, but just had another win as Zed mid :P Was vs lee sin actually and did pretty well, our bot and jungler were pretty good too (finally). But of course you gotta add some of my unluckiness to the mix -- darius was 9 cs at around 10 minutes, fed Garen like 5 kills early on, then afked for like 5 minutes in the middle of the game. Still carried him tho =D
[quote=wRAthoFVuLK]Forgot to screenshot, but just had another win as Zed mid :P Was vs lee sin actually and did pretty well, our bot and jungler were pretty good too (finally). But of course you gotta add some of my unluckiness to the mix -- darius was 9 cs at around 10 minutes, fed Garen like 5 kills early on, then afked for like 5 minutes in the middle of the game. Still carried him tho =D[/quote]
Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
Relevant since this is basically what I see when I read giant qq posts of yours (aka this is a joke)
Spoiler: Click to view

Let's talk about Mr. Wrath of Vulk's principles. Let's talk about them in a very specific and personal way. Before I launch into my main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Wrath's communiqués are simply the result of vested interests striking back at a group whose actions in support of religious freedom, social reform, and government accountability have cut through those vested interests, and (2) as a result of that, like other meddlesome cardsharps, Wrath has a finely honed ability to feed information from sources inside the government to organizations with particularly self-absorbed agendas. Now that you know where I stand on those issues, I can safely say that he doesn't simply want people to believe that everything is happy and fine and good. He wants this belief drummed into people's heads from birth. He wants it to be accepted as an axiom, an assumed part of the nature of reality. Only then will Wrath truly be able to get away with unfurling the flag of prætorianism.
I won't lie to you; Wrath's view is that alarmism is absolutely essential to the well-being of society. If Wrath's pea-brained devotees had any moral or intellectual training, such a position would really be rendered revolting to their better feelings. Wrath's lickspittles all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way he keeps them loyal to him is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. Wrath writes a lot of long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that he constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to his readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that if I said that prudish firebrands have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being completely honest if I said that I used to think it would be possible to work out a compromise with him. Unfortunately, the terms that Wrath insists upon are so entirely unacceptable and so much in contradiction with earlier agreed-upon points that one can conclude only that he occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to sell us fibs and fear mixed with a generous dollop of onanism.
Wrath plans to distract attention from more important issues. The result will be an amalgam of inarticulate Marxism and footling interdenominationalism, if such a monster can be imagined. We must truly supply the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into favoritism. Does that sound extremist? Is it too annoying for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way, but that's life. From this perspective, Wrath would have us introduce more restrictions on our already dwindling freedoms. May God, in his restraining mercy, forbid that we should ever do this most chthonic and surly thing!
All of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of Wrath's stingy revenge fantasies. They are not a cause; they are an effect. Wrath may not be ungrateful, but he sure is destructive. It seems ironic that I am proud that I'm not among the number of offensive, deranged clinchpoops of this world, given that it doesn't really matter why he wants to hinder economic growth and job creation. Whether it's due to a misplaced faith in Machiavellianism, bribes paid to Wrath by temulent flag burners, or nagging from some of the anal-retentive, presentism-oriented publishers of hate literature in his posse, the fact remains that that's what Wrath wants. What I want, in contrast, is to notify you that if he had done his homework, he'd know that purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of his effete rantings. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how there are few certainties in life. I, not being one of the many renitent sluggards of this world, have counted only three: death, taxes, and Wrath doing some brazen thing every few weeks.
I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but I once read an article about how Wrath wants nothing less than to muster enough force to bake us a cake of separatism, filled with hoodlumism and topped with a layer of fetishism. It was the powerful and long-lingering momentum of the impressions received on that occasion, more than any other circumstance, that gave definite form and resolution to my purpose of complaining about addlepated hermits. If his imprecations get any more spleeny, I expect they'll grow legs and attack me in my sleep. We can all have daydreams about Happy Fuzzy Purple Bunny Land, where everyone is caring, loving, and nice. Not only will those daydreams not come true, but if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less acrasial than Wrath. Although it requires risk, commitment, and follow-through to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths, he likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why Wrath recently claimed that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from him a hundred times before.
The disreputable misoneism I've been writing about is not primarily the fault of illiterate ignoramuses, nor of the blowsy snollygosters who befuddle the public and make sin seem like merely a sophisticated fashion. It is the fault of Wrath of Vulk. I once overheard him say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? He said that he possesses infinite wisdom. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that he uses the word "anthropomorphologically" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated.
There's a chance that Wrath will encourage and exacerbate passivity in some people who might otherwise be active and responsible citizens some day. Well, that's extremely speculative, but it is clear today that Wrath's true goal is to create a kind of psychic pain at the very root of the modern mind. All the statements that his secret agents make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least. I have the following advice for him: If you can't manage to be grateful for all the things we've done for you, at least have a little dignity, don't whine, and don't expect to be treated like a fragile doll just because you have a theatrically hypersensitive soul and delusions of entitlement. Wrath exhibits signs of arrested development. That's clear. But I recently overheard a couple of prurient sensualists say that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. Here, again, we encounter the blurred thinking that is characteristic of this Wrath-induced era of slogans and propaganda.
While it's true that Wrath is intellectually dishonest in everything he says and does, he has yet to acknowledge that fact. According to the secret charter of his polity, all of his thralls are required to shatter and ultimately destroy our most precious possessions. Let's be sure that I've made myself absolutely clear: I am not embarrassed to admit that I have neither the training, the experience, the license, nor the clinical setting necessary to properly challenge the present and enrich the future. Nevertheless, I obviously do have the will to resolve our disputes without violence. That's why I feel that Wrath says he'll deplete the ozone layer if anyone dare threaten the existence of his gang. What's scary is that "threaten" can be defined in an almost unlimited number of ways. For instance, Wrath might consider it threatening if one were to claim that there's one frowsy, obscene killjoy I know (more on him later) who thinks that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders". Of course, that's not as bad as the diabolic sociopath I ran into yesterday (more on him later as well) who was totally unable to comprehend that I see how important Wrath's mutinous apothegms are to his expositors and I laugh. I laugh because he turns his back on those who have been the most loyal to him. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to combat the polyloquent ideology of Jacobinism that has infected the minds of so many impudent carousers.
It's easy for us to shake our heads at Wrath's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should convince drugged-out misfits to stop supporting Wrath and tolerating his philippics. It's easy for us to say, "It's amazing how low Wrath will stoop to sensationalize all of the issues." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because it would be great if we could lift our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Still, if we take a step, just a step, towards addressing the issue of miserabilism, then maybe we can open people's eyes (including our own) to a vision of how to fight the good fight.
Given that Wrath uses his victim status as a kind of magic incantation to stifle debate, disparage critical analysis, and persuade us that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs, Wrath is presumptively eager to make a fetish of the virtues of bad-tempered, soulless escapism. No one can claim to know the specific source of his philosophies, but you don't need me to tell you that one of his most loyal supporters is known to have remarked, "Wrath is a wonderful human being." And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that Wrath's policy is to provoke the most crotchety pop psychologists I've ever seen into action. Then, he uses their responses in whatever way he sees fit, generally to promote, foster, and institute nativism. As this letter has hopefully convinced you, Mr. Wrath of Vulk places his indelible imprimatur upon a form of defeatism that is fundamentally, pervasively, and inescapably snarky. The good news is that tomorrow can be better than today. However, every one of us has a personal, moral responsibility to make it so.
I won't lie to you; Wrath's view is that alarmism is absolutely essential to the well-being of society. If Wrath's pea-brained devotees had any moral or intellectual training, such a position would really be rendered revolting to their better feelings. Wrath's lickspittles all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way he keeps them loyal to him is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. Wrath writes a lot of long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that he constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to his readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that if I said that prudish firebrands have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being completely honest if I said that I used to think it would be possible to work out a compromise with him. Unfortunately, the terms that Wrath insists upon are so entirely unacceptable and so much in contradiction with earlier agreed-upon points that one can conclude only that he occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to sell us fibs and fear mixed with a generous dollop of onanism.
Wrath plans to distract attention from more important issues. The result will be an amalgam of inarticulate Marxism and footling interdenominationalism, if such a monster can be imagined. We must truly supply the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into favoritism. Does that sound extremist? Is it too annoying for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way, but that's life. From this perspective, Wrath would have us introduce more restrictions on our already dwindling freedoms. May God, in his restraining mercy, forbid that we should ever do this most chthonic and surly thing!
All of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of Wrath's stingy revenge fantasies. They are not a cause; they are an effect. Wrath may not be ungrateful, but he sure is destructive. It seems ironic that I am proud that I'm not among the number of offensive, deranged clinchpoops of this world, given that it doesn't really matter why he wants to hinder economic growth and job creation. Whether it's due to a misplaced faith in Machiavellianism, bribes paid to Wrath by temulent flag burners, or nagging from some of the anal-retentive, presentism-oriented publishers of hate literature in his posse, the fact remains that that's what Wrath wants. What I want, in contrast, is to notify you that if he had done his homework, he'd know that purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of his effete rantings. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how there are few certainties in life. I, not being one of the many renitent sluggards of this world, have counted only three: death, taxes, and Wrath doing some brazen thing every few weeks.
I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but I once read an article about how Wrath wants nothing less than to muster enough force to bake us a cake of separatism, filled with hoodlumism and topped with a layer of fetishism. It was the powerful and long-lingering momentum of the impressions received on that occasion, more than any other circumstance, that gave definite form and resolution to my purpose of complaining about addlepated hermits. If his imprecations get any more spleeny, I expect they'll grow legs and attack me in my sleep. We can all have daydreams about Happy Fuzzy Purple Bunny Land, where everyone is caring, loving, and nice. Not only will those daydreams not come true, but if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less acrasial than Wrath. Although it requires risk, commitment, and follow-through to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths, he likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why Wrath recently claimed that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from him a hundred times before.
The disreputable misoneism I've been writing about is not primarily the fault of illiterate ignoramuses, nor of the blowsy snollygosters who befuddle the public and make sin seem like merely a sophisticated fashion. It is the fault of Wrath of Vulk. I once overheard him say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? He said that he possesses infinite wisdom. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that he uses the word "anthropomorphologically" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated.
There's a chance that Wrath will encourage and exacerbate passivity in some people who might otherwise be active and responsible citizens some day. Well, that's extremely speculative, but it is clear today that Wrath's true goal is to create a kind of psychic pain at the very root of the modern mind. All the statements that his secret agents make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least. I have the following advice for him: If you can't manage to be grateful for all the things we've done for you, at least have a little dignity, don't whine, and don't expect to be treated like a fragile doll just because you have a theatrically hypersensitive soul and delusions of entitlement. Wrath exhibits signs of arrested development. That's clear. But I recently overheard a couple of prurient sensualists say that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. Here, again, we encounter the blurred thinking that is characteristic of this Wrath-induced era of slogans and propaganda.
While it's true that Wrath is intellectually dishonest in everything he says and does, he has yet to acknowledge that fact. According to the secret charter of his polity, all of his thralls are required to shatter and ultimately destroy our most precious possessions. Let's be sure that I've made myself absolutely clear: I am not embarrassed to admit that I have neither the training, the experience, the license, nor the clinical setting necessary to properly challenge the present and enrich the future. Nevertheless, I obviously do have the will to resolve our disputes without violence. That's why I feel that Wrath says he'll deplete the ozone layer if anyone dare threaten the existence of his gang. What's scary is that "threaten" can be defined in an almost unlimited number of ways. For instance, Wrath might consider it threatening if one were to claim that there's one frowsy, obscene killjoy I know (more on him later) who thinks that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders". Of course, that's not as bad as the diabolic sociopath I ran into yesterday (more on him later as well) who was totally unable to comprehend that I see how important Wrath's mutinous apothegms are to his expositors and I laugh. I laugh because he turns his back on those who have been the most loyal to him. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to combat the polyloquent ideology of Jacobinism that has infected the minds of so many impudent carousers.
It's easy for us to shake our heads at Wrath's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should convince drugged-out misfits to stop supporting Wrath and tolerating his philippics. It's easy for us to say, "It's amazing how low Wrath will stoop to sensationalize all of the issues." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because it would be great if we could lift our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Still, if we take a step, just a step, towards addressing the issue of miserabilism, then maybe we can open people's eyes (including our own) to a vision of how to fight the good fight.
Given that Wrath uses his victim status as a kind of magic incantation to stifle debate, disparage critical analysis, and persuade us that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs, Wrath is presumptively eager to make a fetish of the virtues of bad-tempered, soulless escapism. No one can claim to know the specific source of his philosophies, but you don't need me to tell you that one of his most loyal supporters is known to have remarked, "Wrath is a wonderful human being." And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that Wrath's policy is to provoke the most crotchety pop psychologists I've ever seen into action. Then, he uses their responses in whatever way he sees fit, generally to promote, foster, and institute nativism. As this letter has hopefully convinced you, Mr. Wrath of Vulk places his indelible imprimatur upon a form of defeatism that is fundamentally, pervasively, and inescapably snarky. The good news is that tomorrow can be better than today. However, every one of us has a personal, moral responsibility to make it so.
[quote=Friendly Pony]Relevant since this is basically what I see when I read giant qq posts of yours (aka this is a joke)
[spoiler]Let's talk about Mr. Wrath of Vulk's principles. Let's talk about them in a very specific and personal way. Before I launch into my main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Wrath's communiqués are simply the result of vested interests striking back at a group whose actions in support of religious freedom, social reform, and government accountability have cut through those vested interests, and (2) as a result of that, like other meddlesome cardsharps, Wrath has a finely honed ability to feed information from sources inside the government to organizations with particularly self-absorbed agendas. Now that you know where I stand on those issues, I can safely say that he doesn't simply want people to believe that everything is happy and fine and good. He wants this belief drummed into people's heads from birth. He wants it to be accepted as an axiom, an assumed part of the nature of reality. Only then will Wrath truly be able to get away with unfurling the flag of prætorianism.
I won't lie to you; Wrath's view is that alarmism is absolutely essential to the well-being of society. If Wrath's pea-brained devotees had any moral or intellectual training, such a position would really be rendered revolting to their better feelings. Wrath's lickspittles all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way he keeps them loyal to him is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. Wrath writes a lot of long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that he constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to his readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that if I said that prudish firebrands have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being completely honest if I said that I used to think it would be possible to work out a compromise with him. Unfortunately, the terms that Wrath insists upon are so entirely unacceptable and so much in contradiction with earlier agreed-upon points that one can conclude only that he occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to sell us fibs and fear mixed with a generous dollop of onanism.
Wrath plans to distract attention from more important issues. The result will be an amalgam of inarticulate Marxism and footling interdenominationalism, if such a monster can be imagined. We must truly supply the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into favoritism. Does that sound extremist? Is it too annoying for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way, but that's life. From this perspective, Wrath would have us introduce more restrictions on our already dwindling freedoms. May God, in his restraining mercy, forbid that we should ever do this most chthonic and surly thing!
All of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of Wrath's stingy revenge fantasies. They are not a cause; they are an effect. Wrath may not be ungrateful, but he sure is destructive. It seems ironic that I am proud that I'm not among the number of offensive, deranged clinchpoops of this world, given that it doesn't really matter why he wants to hinder economic growth and job creation. Whether it's due to a misplaced faith in Machiavellianism, bribes paid to Wrath by temulent flag burners, or nagging from some of the anal-retentive, presentism-oriented publishers of hate literature in his posse, the fact remains that that's what Wrath wants. What I want, in contrast, is to notify you that if he had done his homework, he'd know that purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of his effete rantings. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how there are few certainties in life. I, not being one of the many renitent sluggards of this world, have counted only three: death, taxes, and Wrath doing some brazen thing every few weeks.
I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but I once read an article about how Wrath wants nothing less than to muster enough force to bake us a cake of separatism, filled with hoodlumism and topped with a layer of fetishism. It was the powerful and long-lingering momentum of the impressions received on that occasion, more than any other circumstance, that gave definite form and resolution to my purpose of complaining about addlepated hermits. If his imprecations get any more spleeny, I expect they'll grow legs and attack me in my sleep. We can all have daydreams about Happy Fuzzy Purple Bunny Land, where everyone is caring, loving, and nice. Not only will those daydreams not come true, but if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less acrasial than Wrath. Although it requires risk, commitment, and follow-through to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths, he likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why Wrath recently claimed that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from him a hundred times before.
The disreputable misoneism I've been writing about is not primarily the fault of illiterate ignoramuses, nor of the blowsy snollygosters who befuddle the public and make sin seem like merely a sophisticated fashion. It is the fault of Wrath of Vulk. I once overheard him say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? He said that he possesses infinite wisdom. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that he uses the word "anthropomorphologically" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated.
There's a chance that Wrath will encourage and exacerbate passivity in some people who might otherwise be active and responsible citizens some day. Well, that's extremely speculative, but it is clear today that Wrath's true goal is to create a kind of psychic pain at the very root of the modern mind. All the statements that his secret agents make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least. I have the following advice for him: If you can't manage to be grateful for all the things we've done for you, at least have a little dignity, don't whine, and don't expect to be treated like a fragile doll just because you have a theatrically hypersensitive soul and delusions of entitlement. Wrath exhibits signs of arrested development. That's clear. But I recently overheard a couple of prurient sensualists say that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. Here, again, we encounter the blurred thinking that is characteristic of this Wrath-induced era of slogans and propaganda.
While it's true that Wrath is intellectually dishonest in everything he says and does, he has yet to acknowledge that fact. According to the secret charter of his polity, all of his thralls are required to shatter and ultimately destroy our most precious possessions. Let's be sure that I've made myself absolutely clear: I am not embarrassed to admit that I have neither the training, the experience, the license, nor the clinical setting necessary to properly challenge the present and enrich the future. Nevertheless, I obviously do have the will to resolve our disputes without violence. That's why I feel that Wrath says he'll deplete the ozone layer if anyone dare threaten the existence of his gang. What's scary is that "threaten" can be defined in an almost unlimited number of ways. For instance, Wrath might consider it threatening if one were to claim that there's one frowsy, obscene killjoy I know (more on him later) who thinks that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders". Of course, that's not as bad as the diabolic sociopath I ran into yesterday (more on him later as well) who was totally unable to comprehend that I see how important Wrath's mutinous apothegms are to his expositors and I laugh. I laugh because he turns his back on those who have been the most loyal to him. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to combat the polyloquent ideology of Jacobinism that has infected the minds of so many impudent carousers.
It's easy for us to shake our heads at Wrath's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should convince drugged-out misfits to stop supporting Wrath and tolerating his philippics. It's easy for us to say, "It's amazing how low Wrath will stoop to sensationalize all of the issues." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because it would be great if we could lift our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Still, if we take a step, just a step, towards addressing the issue of miserabilism, then maybe we can open people's eyes (including our own) to a vision of how to fight the good fight.
Given that Wrath uses his victim status as a kind of magic incantation to stifle debate, disparage critical analysis, and persuade us that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs, Wrath is presumptively eager to make a fetish of the virtues of bad-tempered, soulless escapism. No one can claim to know the specific source of his philosophies, but you don't need me to tell you that one of his most loyal supporters is known to have remarked, "Wrath is a wonderful human being." And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that Wrath's policy is to provoke the most crotchety pop psychologists I've ever seen into action. Then, he uses their responses in whatever way he sees fit, generally to promote, foster, and institute nativism. As this letter has hopefully convinced you, Mr. Wrath of Vulk places his indelible imprimatur upon a form of defeatism that is fundamentally, pervasively, and inescapably snarky. The good news is that tomorrow can be better than today. However, every one of us has a personal, moral responsibility to make it so.[/spoiler][/quote]
And, I woulda won, went legendary hec in 15 min, and fizz leaves.
FML SERIOUSLY LOL
WHY DO I GET THIS **** EVERY ****ING GAME
oh and 1-7 ashe
FML SERIOUSLY LOL
WHY DO I GET THIS **** EVERY ****ING GAME
oh and 1-7 ashe
[quote=wRAthoFVuLK]And, I woulda won, went legendary hec in 15 min, and fizz leaves.
FML SERIOUSLY LOL
WHY DO I GET THIS CRAP EVERY FUCKING GAME
oh and 1-7 ashe[/quote]
Thanks to TRUeLM, Plastictree, Scrax, Xiaowiriamu, foggy12, JahGFX, jhoijhoi, msrobinson, JEFFY40HANDS, Nyoike, MissMaw, and me :) for the sigs!
<Altruistic Artist>