@ jhoijhoi @ Bryun thanks for your detailed feedback / notes and even mockups :) I think you definitely make some good points and I'll be working with the team to try some more variations on B that address some clarity issues(and the repetition thing since that has been brought up a lot internally too haha)
@ IPodPulse @ Chaotic Version thanks for lettings us know which you like better, and for your interesting in the site in general! :) Definitely let us know any other thoughts you come up with!
@ IPodPulse @ Chaotic Version thanks for lettings us know which you like better, and for your interesting in the site in general! :) Definitely let us know any other thoughts you come up with!

Thanks to GrandMasterD for my sig!
repetitive stats are boring and really pointless imo (especially since you are comparing different champions to each other?) -> more clutter (bad)
I think that there should be a hover-over '?' that pop-ups a card which explains that stats here and there are this and that because I still have a hard time keeping up with what this all means...
I think that there should be a hover-over '?' that pop-ups a card which explains that stats here and there are this and that because I still have a hard time keeping up with what this all means...
Some more suggestions:
Simple one: On champion stats tool, it'd be cool to select to see champions for a specific role, for example instead of viewing overall top winrates, you could view top winrate for midlane champions only.
Also, the post match stats aren't too kind for the eyes:

Red team written in purple is offensive
Jokes aside, I think the colors aren't helpful, the first time I found them pretty confusing.
I tried something like this:

Pretty easier to understand what team is what. The highlights could be, like shown, of the same color of the champion's bar and they'd be only on the higher value. For example, comparing the two laners, the lower CS wouldn't be highlighted, while the higher one would have , like shown above, a box of the same color of the bar. I find this easier to look at and less confusing.
Now, just a small thing I noticed, but this could be just personal preference:
Noticed that I'm hella good at warding. Jokes,
That becomes this:
And also this:

Hope this was of any help and/or gave you some good ideas!
Have a nice day
Simple one: On champion stats tool, it'd be cool to select to see champions for a specific role, for example instead of viewing overall top winrates, you could view top winrate for midlane champions only.
Also, the post match stats aren't too kind for the eyes:

Red team written in purple is offensive
Jokes aside, I think the colors aren't helpful, the first time I found them pretty confusing.
I tried something like this:

Pretty easier to understand what team is what. The highlights could be, like shown, of the same color of the champion's bar and they'd be only on the higher value. For example, comparing the two laners, the lower CS wouldn't be highlighted, while the higher one would have , like shown above, a box of the same color of the bar. I find this easier to look at and less confusing.
Now, just a small thing I noticed, but this could be just personal preference:

That becomes this:

And also this:


Hope this was of any help and/or gave you some good ideas!
Have a nice day

I really like all the above suggestions, especially the one regarding the score board. It's a lot more aesthetically pleasing and just easier to understand. I'd pick a slightly softer green background for the suggestion thingy boxes :)
I'm not sure about the text color. Maybe just the colored backgrounds would be enough for clarity's sake? I guess I'd have to see it to know.
I will say the red text looks pretty decent. I mostly don't like the blue/green as much.
I will say the red text looks pretty decent. I mostly don't like the blue/green as much.

Thanks to The_Nameless_Bard for the sig!
Mowen wrote:
@ FatelBlade yes, I have noted your feedback too.
I would really love to see what you would do with the logo since you seem to have so many issues with it, how would you propose it look? :)
I would really love to see what you would do with the logo since you seem to have so many issues with it, how would you propose it look? :)

Spent a little bit of time making some visuals to help me explain some of the nitpicks about the site/icon; here's what I got so far
(On the Left) Current vs Idea (On the Right)
List of what I did tl;dr
List of what I did tl;dr
With more time, effort, and messing with the fonts and stuff to make it fit more, it'd look nicer ; n ;

COMING SOON: Site Nitpicking



Given that the unavailable holiday quints currently listed are the same (or basically the same) as the regular ones, you should probably change the quints to just regular flat health quints.

When I went to check my opponent's thing from this game, I noticed this:

I highly doubt any high ranked person seriously trying to play support refuses to buy sightstone consistently. Yet almost all supports don't have sightstone listed as a core item (misleading to low ranking players who already regularly refuse to buy the item). There's also no difference between the items/runes/masteries/summoner spells listed for gold, plat, and diamond (other than the ranking in "from [ranking] support [champion] matches"), I'm not sure if that's an error or not.

When I went to check my opponent's thing from this game, I noticed this:

I highly doubt any high ranked person seriously trying to play support refuses to buy sightstone consistently. Yet almost all supports don't have sightstone listed as a core item (misleading to low ranking players who already regularly refuse to buy the item). There's also no difference between the items/runes/masteries/summoner spells listed for gold, plat, and diamond (other than the ranking in "from [ranking] support [champion] matches"), I'm not sure if that's an error or not.
You need to log in before commenting.
<MOBAFire Mother>
♡ sig by Jovy ♡